Air Asia plane comes within 150m of colliding with Jetstar flight

sorry. i googled it an it came up. I have no subscription to the paper.

An example of a type of journalism that stresses sensationalism over accuracy. Another poster refers to the publication as 'just a rubbishy gossipy tabloid rag'

Of course there is a reason... It's a report in a News "Limited", Murdoch publication... They have no use for fair, unbiased reporting.

Lawrence Green, I think you misunderstood what I meant about A before J.I wasn't replying to your comment, I was replying to the people who were asking why Air Asia was being written first instead of Jetstar. I am not making any comment about fault simply about how the article was written and that writers will naturally put something beginning with A before J. I think when the journalist wrote the article, he was just writing it as news and not as a factual report apportioning blame. No doubt when the results of the investigation come, they will say the Guilty aircraft (name) infringed on the air space of and then the name of the innocent party. I hope this makes sense. I don't know who was at fault neither did the reporter hence the use of alphabetical order. God I seem to have written gone with the wind here trying to explain myself:-) Have a good and safe day.