Back to Squawk list
  • 25

United "You're going to like where we land." ad at WTC site

제출됨
 
Following the flight 93/175 reinstatement debacle, another gaffe out of United at the site of the UAL175 crash. (www.nbcnewyork.com) 기타...

Sort type: [Top] [Newest]


cm5299
Chuck Me 0
Wow. What a bunch of oversensitive people. Only someone looking for something to get ticked off about would see this and get worked up over it.

Good job by the media making something out of nothing.
sfjaero
What does United have to do with WTC even before the tragedy?
KauaiGolfer
Must've been a very slow news day. Come on!
lboyette
I feel VERY strongly as an American that we should as a whole put this behind us and move on. With respect to all that gave their lives during this unfortunate event in history I would say as a proud American we're better than that. We've paid our respects, mourned and grieved for more than 10 years.

As a Colorado resident I wasn't there, however, It's this type of attitude that holds us back from moving forward. As a former Volunteer Fire Fighter I know none of my would ask me to hold back from a better tomorrow if this had happened to them. Respect what needs to be respected and move on. Remember what needs to be remembered and learn from what history teaches us, and move forward.
JCCasebeer
It seems like somebody has to be blamed for everything. The American people and the corporations need to lighten up. Things happen unwittingly and always will. I agree with padgtettrea i.e. don't miss a chance to complain!
Sox0407
I do not think it is United's fault, they do not get to pick where their ads are put.
padgettrea
It said LAND, not CRASH. It's an Ad. Noone would mind if it were a Southwest ad? Had it been discussed, I'm quite sure it wouldn't have been placed in that location but for pete's sake... Anything for a chance to complain. Or perhaps they're correct... Perhaps we wouldn't like landing in New York, Washington, DC or Pennsylvania.
linebet
The only entity at fault is an overly-sensational media outlet looking for ratings during sweeps. Very Fox News-like, WNBC.
zone5ive
zone5ive 0
A company that hires an agency that uses bad judgement should be prepared to accept blame if they get negative publicity. And most people won't dig down to get the facts behind a story but will accept it at face value. Many, many more will hear about it second hand. All will conclude that United did a bad thing. It's not ridiculous, it's human nature. Sometimes a confluence of events and circumstances that come into play does produce an unfortunate result that is nobody's fault. This is not such an instance.
JCCasebeer
If you remember the downing of KAL 007 by the Russians over s ahkalin Island en-route to Seoul you will like this. They started an ad that week that said "Your flight on Korean not only seems shorter, it is shorter" as they had just been approved for a shorter route. Things like this happen and it is nobody's fault.
Drag0nflamez
It's pretty bad coincidence. United should fire their marketing agency for this giant error.
FedExCargoPilot
its not united's fault, though it does sound a pretty bad coincidence that it was placed there.
indy2001
indy2001 0
United hired the vendor to put up a certain number of signs scattered around the region. The actual locations were selected by that vendor, not United. So blaming United is ridiculous.
sheka
mark tufts 0
stupit on uniteds part as well as the vendor. i would have put the ad in a different ;ocation
homedepo20
Ronnie Mc 0
This is going to far, its an ad...

로그인

계정을 가지고 계십니까? 사용자 정의된 기능, 비행 경보 및 더 많은 정보를 위해 지금(무료) 등록하세요!
FlightAware 항공편 추적이 광고로 지원된다는 것을 알고 계셨습니까?
FlightAware.com의 광고를 허용하면 FlightAware를 무료로 유지할 수 있습니다. Flightaware에서는 훌륭한 경험을 제공할 수 있도록 관련성있고 방해되지 않는 광고를 유지하기 위해 열심히 노력하고 있습니다. FlightAware에서 간단히 광고를 허용 하거나 프리미엄 계정을 고려해 보십시오..
종료