Back to Squawk list
  • 45

The Selling of the 707 (Fortune, 1957)

제출됨
 
Great reprint from 54 years ago: America's first jet transport—the Boeing 707—will soon roll down the runway. For Boeing, the nation's top producer of bombers, the huge plane marks a new bid for leadership in a field long dominated by Douglas. (features.blogs.fortune.cnn.com) 기타...

Sort type: [Top] [Newest]


sstuff
sstuff 0
Sincere thanks, MD, from this no-ticket enthusiast; fascinating history, that.
preacher1
Queen of the skies. Lot's have evolved from her but SHE was the LADY!!!!!!
JCCasebeer
What a wonderful airplane. It changed the world forever!
JCCasebeer
I remember my first flight on the 707, December of 1957 AAL BOS to ORD. it was the old torbojt had old tube type of sound suppression out of which came puffs of black smoke. I will never forget it.
agg1930
agg1930 0
What beautiful memories! I was lucky enough to be part of the Boeing Company in those days working in the engineering department in the so called dash-80 building in Renton.
It is very sad that this is published the same day that we learn of the stupid statements of that woman pelosi about the South Carolina Boeing facility!
preacher1
You know, here is the history of the groundbreaker that took over the skies and changed the world. Counting this one, there are 6 comments here. On the story about Pelosi and the SC Boeing plant, last time I checked there were about 70 and still coming. What is sad is that so many have something to say about that trash and only a few here about a landmark event.
agg1930
agg1930 0
Well said, Wayne!
rickret
While working for TWA in the 60's I can still remember what a new 707 was like as it came into Kansas City from the Boeing. We would have the new aircraft for a couple weeks putting in modification's before it went on the line. What a great aircraft!
Paciano
Qantas was at the forefront of international airlines which saw the jet future and backed the 707. In 1968 I flew first class Sydney to London on one of the first services, and could not believe the smoothness of the ride or the lack of noise - just the continuous whoosh of air over the fuselage. In fact I didn't fly all the way to London - I got off in Cairo, then one of the Qantas destinations. Three days later I continued my trip in a BOAC VC-10 which was an even better and more luxurious experience. Those rear-mounted engines gave every passenger a quieter journey. Sadly, the 707 v VC-10 competition on top of the Comet disasters was typical of the declining British prestige and achievement in aviation and engineering generally.

You may be interested to know that the first Qantas 707 VH-XBA (X designates it is now off the register) is now parked on the hardstanding of the original Qantas hangar at Longreach in Central Western Queensland, where the airline started. It, along with a DC3 and a Boeing 747 form part of the static display outside the Qantas Museum which records the airline's history. Here's the link: http://www.qfom.com.au/
jbermo
jbermo 0
I recall the buzz and excitement of the late 50’s as it pertained to the significant advancement of aerospace. TWA’s Howard Hughes was late to the party because TWA was so heavily invested in its new Super Constellations. I don’t think TWA ever again caught up with it's major airline cousins, especially after TWA’s later wrong turn in buying the fast but fuel thirsty Convair 880.

The one thing that nobody came close to predicting back then however, was the magnitude of the rapid rise in population (and the traveling demands that came along with it). There are now twice as many people on earth as there was when back in 1957.
preacher1
Im 1968, I had an opportunity to fly on a TWA Convair 880. Fuel thirsty it may have been, and as much as I like the 707, I have to admit it was one of the quiestest and smoothest flights I have ever had; Milk run passing thru sky harbor to OKC for me. FO had a heart attack and weather front coming in was socking everything in and I got opportunity to fly right seat. Pilots dream. What can I say
mikerigby
Best looking aircraft ever produced by Boeing. My first flight, 1960, Qantas, Honolulu-Sydney. (F.Y.I. - Queensland and Northern Territory Air Service). Passengers wore suits and dresses when flying. A far cry from today.
rahodges
I June of 1959 my wife and I flew from New York to London on a Pan Am 707. Due to headwinds we had to make an unscheduled stop in Shanon to refuel.
agg1930
agg1930 0
In that route the prevailing winds are tailwinds when flying from New York to London. I suspect that the unscheduled landing was due to excessive fuel consumption on those early engines. The 707 did not meet its range predictions at first.
That was one reason that Pan Am did not fly it in their Pacific routes and instead scheduled their DC-8's.
Hope my memory of those days serves me well....
mduell
You can take a shot at reliving the experience by taking one of the 757 westbound transatlantic services on windy day.
preacher1
Iremember 1in 1962 as a kid, wishing we could get on one as they were all the rage, but coming back from Germany we wound up on a Seaboard Airline 4 engine turbo prop of some kind, droning all nite long from Frankfurt to McGuire/Ft Dix, NJ, stopping in Shannon for a meal and refuel, then going on. Sad to stand there at Frankfurt and watch them take off and have to ride that POS all the way back to the states.
mikerigby
Re. My 1960 Christmas eve flight Honolulu-Sydney, Quantas required refuel in Fiji. Interesting.
MimosaDrive
Fascinating story!
bungalowt
Did you mean 1967?
rasutcliffe
Excellent read. For those who want more on the make-or-break competition between the commercial airliner manufacturers, I suggest "The Sporty Game" by John Newhouse (1982).
bungalowt
The message about 1957 vs 1967 was directed at John Casebeer. There is no possible way that he could have flown an AA 707 BOS to ORD in 1957. I apologize for the misunderstanding. I know the Fortune article was published in 1957, before the aircraft went into commercial operations. Since I clicked on Reply under his name, I naturally assumed that he would be the one replying to the question. I guess, I misunderstood the purpose of that link.
preacher1
Tony: clicking on REPLY should have put your comment under his.
bungalowt
Thanks Wayne, but I got a message reaterating the 1957 Fortune Article date, which is obviously not what I was questioning.

로그인

계정을 가지고 계십니까? 사용자 정의된 기능, 비행 경보 및 더 많은 정보를 위해 지금(무료) 등록하세요!
이 웹 사이트는 쿠키를 사용합니다. 이 웹 사이트를 사용하고 탐색함으로써 귀하는 이러한 쿠기 사용을 수락하는 것입니다.
종료
FlightAware 항공편 추적이 광고로 지원된다는 것을 알고 계셨습니까?
FlightAware.com의 광고를 허용하면 FlightAware를 무료로 유지할 수 있습니다. Flightaware에서는 훌륭한 경험을 제공할 수 있도록 관련성있고 방해되지 않는 광고를 유지하기 위해 열심히 노력하고 있습니다. FlightAware에서 간단히 광고를 허용 하거나 프리미엄 계정을 고려해 보십시오..
종료