All
← Back to Squawk list
F-18 Night Carrier Operations USS Carl Vinson (Video)
Aircraft assigned to Carrier Air Wing 17 finish out 2014 flight operations aboard USS Carl Vinson (CVN 70). The ship and embarked air wing are deployed in the U.S. 5th Fleet area of responsibility supporting Operation Inherent Resolve, strike operations in Iraq and Syria as directed, maritime security operations, and theater security cooperation efforts in the region. (youtu.be) More...Sort type: [Top] [Newest]
I have a buddy that flew F-4U Corsairs off of a carrier during the Korean war. He described making a night carrier landing to me as like shitting in your pants and having an ejaculation at the same time. He also admitted (after several hours at the bar) to landing on the wrong carrier once. He says he NEVER did that again, and never lived it down.
The Navy initially rejected the F4U Corsair for carrier ops when it was initially introduced into the fleet because of the difficulty with maintaining lineup in the groove what with the F4U's long nose relative to the pilot's seated position so far aft blocking too much of the forward field of view. So the Navy gave the advanced Fighter exclusively to the Marines who immediately proceeded to station it on Guadalcanal at Henderson Field among which was the famous Black Sheep Squadron commanded by then Major Greg "Pappy" Boyington. At 31 years of age he was the old man in a squadron comprised mostly of young tigers in their early twenties so they nicknamed him "Pappy" and the name stuck. The rest is history with the Marines but the Navy eventually took the F4U back aboard ship when a Brit (Lend Lease to the British) figured out that if you flew the airplane in a slight right yawed steady heading sideslip when on final approach coming aboard ship kicking it out at the cut signal from the LSO it could be operated safely.
With respect to the F-18 night carrier ops, there's consolation in knowing some things haven't changed since yours truly operated off USS boat (Forrestal, Saratoga and America) 44 years ago except obviously the equipment and one man fighter airplanes. I saw what appeared to be at least one taxi one wire (the first arresting cable) and at least one 4 wire engagement (the last arresting cable). The optimum or target wire/cable for which the Fresnel Lens (OLS) is set is number 3. Either there were no bolters or they were edited out. The FBW side stick controllers of the F-18 because they are obviously gripped during the turbulent arrested rollout obviously causes the flight controls to dance around some in response.
There's not a noisier nor more hazardous environment than that of a U.S. Carrier flight deck during flight ops especially at nighttime. Though I'm guessing its substantially more now (maybe not in 1971 dollars), 44 years ago the flight deck hazardous duty pay for those deck hands shown in the video was a mere $50 which ain't much considering how hazardous the working conditions are in their office. I witnessed several tragic fatal accidents, one of which involved a catapult officer during launch the graphic details of which I'll leave to your imagination.
With respect to the F-18 night carrier ops, there's consolation in knowing some things haven't changed since yours truly operated off USS boat (Forrestal, Saratoga and America) 44 years ago except obviously the equipment and one man fighter airplanes. I saw what appeared to be at least one taxi one wire (the first arresting cable) and at least one 4 wire engagement (the last arresting cable). The optimum or target wire/cable for which the Fresnel Lens (OLS) is set is number 3. Either there were no bolters or they were edited out. The FBW side stick controllers of the F-18 because they are obviously gripped during the turbulent arrested rollout obviously causes the flight controls to dance around some in response.
There's not a noisier nor more hazardous environment than that of a U.S. Carrier flight deck during flight ops especially at nighttime. Though I'm guessing its substantially more now (maybe not in 1971 dollars), 44 years ago the flight deck hazardous duty pay for those deck hands shown in the video was a mere $50 which ain't much considering how hazardous the working conditions are in their office. I witnessed several tragic fatal accidents, one of which involved a catapult officer during launch the graphic details of which I'll leave to your imagination.
Try doing it in a COD at 0200 and foggy conditions.
Note the last F-18 to trap is the tanker. Boggles the mind to think that the Carrier Navy is dependent on F-18s to provide airborne fuel!
Why not? They've practically replaced everything else with Hornets. Soon you'll have COD and AEW/AWACS via the Hornet airframe!
Please note the intended sarcasm. I'm sure we can all agree that the Hornet family has a number of performance drawbacks over the aircraft it has replaced (Tomcat, Intruder, Prowler, Texaco, am I forgetting anything?)
Please note the intended sarcasm. I'm sure we can all agree that the Hornet family has a number of performance drawbacks over the aircraft it has replaced (Tomcat, Intruder, Prowler, Texaco, am I forgetting anything?)
Ever want to try this...one cn only marvel at the instrumentation that enables this magnitude of ops in the dark.