이 웹 사이트는 쿠키를 사용합니다. 이 웹 사이트를 사용하고 탐색함으로써 귀하는 이러한 쿠기 사용을 수락하는 것입니다.
종료
FlightAware 항공편 추적이 광고로 지원된다는 것을 알고 계셨습니까?
FlightAware.com의 광고를 허용하면 FlightAware를 무료로 유지할 수 있습니다. Flightaware에서는 훌륭한 경험을 제공할 수 있도록 관련성있고 방해되지 않는 광고를 유지하기 위해 열심히 노력하고 있습니다. FlightAware에서 간단히 광고를 허용 하거나 프리미엄 계정을 고려해 보십시오..
종료
Back to Squawk list
  • 22

Fatigued Superjet test pilot used wrong throttle before crash

제출됨
 
Icelandic investigators have concluded that a fatigued Sukhoi Superjet crew advanced the wrong throttle lever during a single-engined go-around test before the aircraft overran the runway. The inquiry into the 21 July 2013 accident at Reykjavik’s Keflavik airport found that, although the crew was well-rested before the original planned duty time, “significant and repeated” delays meant this was not the case at the time of the testing. (www.flightglobal.com) 기타...

Sort type: [Top] [Newest]


Highflyer1950
Interesting, all the aircraft that I flew with autoland/autothrottle would in the event of an engine failure/shutdown, the auto throttles would disconnect immediately. In addiition, whenever an engine was shutdown, we would always carry the inoperative throttle whether there were two, three or four thrust levers. Can anyone confirm autothrottle engagement with an engine inop.
Bernie20910
But would that be true if you were only simulating an engine out?
Highflyer1950
How would you simulate an engine out without either retarding the throttle or actually shutting it down. Either way the auto throttle logic would disconnect but not the autopilot if engaged, unless G/A is selected. Just asking?
Bernie20910
You're right, I didn't think that through. Serves me right for posting when I'm medicated.
Highflyer1950
No worries, have done that myself.
ColinSeftel
If one engine had actually failed on approach at 25ft over a runway, is there any reason to execute a go-around? Wouldn't it be safer to just land?
flightluuvr
I think the reason for the go around was simply because they needed to do more tests (touch-and-gos).
williambaker08
No because you have different speeds for landing on one engine as well as handling capabilities for stopping power etc.
Highflyer1950
yes up tp a point, but in reality when executing a go around below 25 feet you may have already selected a landing flap setting. So unless the runway becomes fouled, you land. If not then the added stopping distance for "say a lesser flap setting" and the typical increased speed would only increase the stopping distance marginally. But, I think this may be a test flight for certification purposes.
jbsimms
смотреть Тхи дерьмо
dgjones
I agree with the stupid software comment. Too many ifs to work out in a split second....
ayayay
The whole crew was fatigued??????
jshhmr
"Alexi! Hold vodka bottle and watch this!"
williambaker08
And I rest my case. There trying to break down the 737 saying it has a rudder issue but the Superjet has a bigger issue. It's called stupidity software or let's see where we can crash this time software lol. Get real Russia this plane is a mess even your pilots can't fly it like they should. However the 737 is a beast and is flown by any pilot out there without issue lol.
redrattler47
With what authority do you say this plane is a Russian mess?

로그인

계정을 가지고 계십니까? 사용자 정의된 기능, 비행 경보 및 더 많은 정보를 위해 지금(무료) 등록하세요!