NASA DC-8 Flying Laboratory Spots Unusual Square Iceberg

← Back to Squawk list

NASA DC-8 Flying Laboratory Spots Unusual Square Iceberg

1년 전 제출됨

Operation IceBridge, NASA’s longest-running aerial survey of polar ice, flew over the northern Antarctic Peninsula. (aviationbuzzword.com) 기타...

magnetoz

22 멤버 코멘트

Sort type: [Top] [Newest]

Dave Rose 1년 전 1

It’s a rectangle for Christ sakes...

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Report

Dave Fisher 1년 전 -2

i am embarrassed to share the same name with you.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Parent•Report

Роман Беляков 1년 전 1

Looks like Noah's ark...

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Report

Dave Fisher 1년 전 -4

idiot

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Parent•Report

D Rotten 1년 전 -3

And yet, nobody asks WHY it is that NASA is even in the Antarctic!!

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Report

Bruce Atkinson 1년 전 0

OR,flying a DC-8?

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Parent•Report

Jesse Carroll 1년 전 3

Doing what NASA does!
geeeeeezzzzz this site going to hell...#WALKAWAY dude!

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Parent•Report

[This comment was deleted.]

D Rotten 1년 전 0

Poor lil Troll! Sounds like you need to get a life! Feel the need to reply to people's comments with your nothing-ness, do ya? Poor thing! Mommy/Daddy didn't give you enough attention?? LOL

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Parent•Report

hal pushpak 1년 전 -9

Ironic that they'd be using an old, polluting four-engined airliner at (inefficient) low altitudes for polar surveys. Must be a legacy flying lab. Nonetheless, it might be interesting to see the (corroborating?) data they gathered over the years..

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Report

Shenghao Han 1년 전 22

Just in case you didn’t know, the NASA DC-8 is a series 70 DC-8. The “polluting” JT3D was replaced with CFM56B, which are the same engines used on A340 and 737NG. So, there is no cleaner flying 4 engine medium-long range alternative exist, and given DC-8 is smaller than A340, 747 and A380, I think you will agree it will burn less fuel than those.
The DC8 often fly 6-8 hours over arctic seas and Antarctica with no alternative airports nor rescue stations nearby, personally I won’t even risk to fly that long on a twin. Remember when doing Atlantic crossing there are several diversion airports available, when flying over Antarctica... good luck with finding the nearest research station....

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Parent•Report

Erik Bruner 1년 전 2

Thank you, saved me the trouble of typing that out.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Parent•Report

hal pushpak 1년 전 1

Good to know. Thanks.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Parent•Report

bbabis 1년 전 15

Flying in that area of the world, I want as many engines as possible.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Parent•Report

James Simms 1년 전 1

The more engines you have, the merrier

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Parent•Report

Jacob Buchanan 1년 전 -7

Can anyone reply to me just exactly why this is a "good" comment?

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Parent•Report

ToddBaldwin3 1년 전 2

I would say this is a good comment for several reasons. First, the writer simply presented facts, not guesses, suppositions, or assumptions. The facts explained why this aircraft is a good choice. Another reason, and almost more importantly, the writer did so without using invective, personal attacks, or even suggesting that someone might be wrong. It was polite and informative.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Parent•Report

Jacob Buchanan 1년 전 -4

Can't even edit a post, but it seems like a bunch of shills hover over these buttons more-so than what happens on your average reddit string..

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Parent•Report

bigkahuna400 1년 전 2

These are extremely well maintained as well.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Parent•Report

RECOR10 1년 전 -3

No matter what. These folks can prove that humans are or are not causing anything other than the depth of the latrine....who again melted the glaciers over the great plains?

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Parent•Report

Dave Fisher 1년 전 -1

troll

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Parent•Report

RECOR10 1년 전 1

You have their proof? What again got the glaciers?

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Parent•Report

Em Fairley 1년 전 0

Pot calling the kettle! Idiot!

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Parent•Report

FlightAware.com의 광고를 허용하면 FlightAware를 무료로 유지할 수 있습니다. Flightaware에서는 훌륭한 경험을 제공할 수 있도록 관련성있고 방해되지 않는 광고를 유지하기 위해 열심히 노력하고 있습니다. FlightAware에서 간단히 광고를 허용 하거나 프리미엄 계정을 고려해 보십시오..

종료