← Back to Squawk list
  • 16

Boeing set to lose biggest planemaker title as deliveries fall 37%

제출됨
 
Deliveries of the MAX aircraft were stopped in March after an Ethiopian Airlines crash killed all 157 people on board. Since then, Boeing has not reported any new order for the MAX planes. (uk.reuters.com) 기타...

MH370
주별 선정뉴스 정키열정자친구우등생 명부오늘의 픽아마추어 사진사홍보인애타주의자아나운서자서전 작가

Sort type: [Top] [Newest]


clipper759
joe johnson 9
Flew with a Captain years ago at a once great carrier that is no more. She said it best "The most expensive thing this company does, is save money."
응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Report
Jackx9
Don Quixote -3
The media just loves to cover Boeing and Airbus, and it's hilarious how anti and biased they are.
응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Report
belzybob
belzybob 6
In the light of current events, bias is not an issue. Unless of course it is your own.
응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report
djames225
djames225 3
How is this article biased when it is just stating clear facts?
응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report
BobWysocki
Bob Wysocki-Borejsza 0
I was just reading your past comments, you really like to show everyone how smart you are by degrading everyone's comments, who did you say you fly for, do you really have your wings or are they feather wings of a black bird, hey belzybob ? I wonder of Flightaware tolerates racist comments here ?
응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Report
BobWysocki
Bob Wysocki-Borejsza 0
stupid decisions lead to stupid results, their own fault for sourcing Chinese parts/components
응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Report
djames225
djames225 1
WTHeck has Boeings fault got to do with China made parts? If you have a beef with China made parts, please take it to another forum.
응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report
belzybob
belzybob 1
Yes, Boeing's fault. Don't blame Chinese suppliers.
응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report
BobWysocki
Bob Wysocki-Borejsza 1
I absolutely do blame Chinese suppliers always have been supplying sub standard parts - I worked for PW&C for 15 years and we saw this all the time out of 100 parts shipped 90 were scrapped maybe today it is 50/50 but still quality does not play a major issue with China - the green back does
응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report

belzybob
belzybob 2
Presumably you are of Polish extraction, so you can be excused for your stupid comments. The fault is in the company that accepted the parts, not the supplier. if a company has crap QA, that is the problem.
응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report
BobWysocki
Bob Wysocki-Borejsza 0
do the planes you fly are old or do they have APUs ?
응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report
BobWysocki
Bob Wysocki-Borejsza 0
what does my ethnicity have to do with this. QA 1st off inspection were the ones that scrapped these parts - as some parts were to spec in configuration but to material specs, you are a pilot ( so called commercial) did you not read my comment or were you driven by the fact that I am of Politics origin. The QA problem starts with China doing final inspection before parts are shipped.
응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report
BobWysocki
Bob Wysocki-Borejsza 1
typo - Polish origin and not to material specs..
응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report
djames225
djames225 1
The companies in China do the inspections before parts are shipped, not China itself..eg Safran has an inhouse team which inspects it's shipments.. ALL it's shipments, from it's plants.
응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report
BobWysocki
Bob Wysocki-Borejsza 0
Even landing gear parts for the 787 Dreamliner, had to scrap lots of shipments and that is just in the last few years
응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report
djames225
djames225 1
Safran hasn't had to scarp lots of parts from it's own China factory..smh.
응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report
djames225
djames225 1
*scrap not scarp
응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report

로그인

패스워드를 잊으셨나요?
계정을 가지고 계십니까? 사용자 정의된 기능, 비행 경보 및 더 많은 정보를 위해 지금(무료) 등록하세요!
FlightAware에 참여하세요
FlightAware 항공편 추적이 광고로 지원된다는 것을 알고 계셨습니까?
FlightAware.com의 광고를 허용하면 FlightAware를 무료로 유지할 수 있습니다. Flightaware에서는 훌륭한 경험을 제공할 수 있도록 관련성있고 방해되지 않는 광고를 유지하기 위해 열심히 노력하고 있습니다. FlightAware에서 간단히 광고를 허용 하거나 프리미엄 계정을 고려해 보십시오..
종료