Back to Squawk list
  • 44

Tailwind and poor braking present before ERJ-145 excursion

제출됨
 
Preliminary indications suggest the Envoy Air Embraer ERJ-145 which suffered a runway excursion at Chicago O'Hare had landed with a tailwind in gusting conditions. (www.flightglobal.com) 기타...

Sort type: [Top] [Newest]


airuphere
If you watch the video... looks like they should of kept going on the rwy - breaking action wasn’t good enough for that high speed taxi way.. they had runway left..
Video Link FYI —>>. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=quMUAwp_szk
mk882004
I also am of the opinion that there is NO way they were trying to turn off on a reverse high speed on snowy conditions. They appear to have begun to lost control long before they were at P4,
rartac
I think the absolutely were shooting for the high speed. The flaps are at 22, which indicates to me the pilots were simply going through the motions and hadn't considered the variables in play. "Well, we ALWAYS exit at P4 becuase that's where the gates are". Happens all the time.
williambaker08
Like i said before they were trying to turn off at P4 from what the FAA was saying and i got yelled at for it. They were going way to fast for that turn off in any conditions.
abowland
P4 would have been a reverse high speed for them...almost no way they were trying to turn off.
Searcher06
Only a 9Kt tailwind. However the 24Kt gusting crosswind on a marginal surface condition could be fun.....
jbowman90
I bet they just weathervaned in the crosswind.
rartac
Incorrect. The aircraft yawed left, indicating a left to right crosswind. The aircraft would jave slid off the RIGHT side of the runway, not left, according to your theory. You can't drift upwind if you're skidding.
ppcflyer777
That's what it looks like. I believe they said the runway condition at the time was 1/1/1
svenf
9 kts tailwind is quite substantial, most airlines consider 10 an absolute cutoff as far as I know.
WALLACE24
Those conditions can bite the best of of pilots. Just because the previous traffic made it means nothing to the next guy. That said, the pilots will bear the heat, barring a mechanical failure, just because,
ADAvViation
am I wrong, I do not see the spoilers being deployed
abowland
The outer panels are just that...panels. The spoilers are deployed right at the bottom of the screen or at the wind root.
rartac
Spoilers are visible toward the end of the video. They aren't all that effective on this aircraft and dont span the whole wing.
Tanman3880
If you look at the AV herald article (link below) it shows an aerial image of O'Hare and the "approximate final position" of the plane. It appears that the plane veered left and skidded off on the "N-1" turn off which appears to be for planes landing on 28R (opposite direction). I'm no expert. Scary for sure.



https://avherald.com/h?article=4cf1eedf&opt=0
mbrews
mbrews 2
- Given the runway conditions and possible tailwind component, perhaps flight crew had an unfortunate case of Get-there-itis. Not sure what was their alternate, nor whether at the alternate.

Note the regional carriers only get paid to "move the rig" from point A to point B. Would be interesting to review stats on how many Regional flights end up diverting to alternates, versus how many Mainline flights involve a diversion
ppcflyer777
The airline only gets paid for A to B but the pilots and flight attendants get paid by the flight hour.
rartac
Took 11 seconds for TR full reverse (sounds like half or even idle deploy until then) Flaps appear to be in 22 degree position as well, not 45. 1/1/1 FICON plus a 9 kt tailwind? Yep, i think the aircraft performed as intended. The nuts behind the wheel failed. Performance decreases exponentially with tailwind. These guys were idiots.
pthomas745
"suffered a runway excursion"

Reading this crap is torture.......
Lib4ever
Could have been worse. Could have said "excursion from the tarmac."

notarookie
I love tarmac & cheese
JohnSmythe
Ya, I guess it would be politically incorrect to refer to it as a “ bit of a wipe out” but with a good ending.
KobeHunte
Kobe Hunte -6
So pilot error is to do with it?
KobeHunte
I was just asking a question and got downvoted like crazy...
rartac
Absolutely. As stated above, barring any MELs or mechanical issue, pilots 100% to blame.
rartac
Even then, MEL or mechanical issues, unelss experienced at the time of the departure from the runway, should cause a crew to plan accordingly.

[This comment has been downvoted. Show anyway.]

abowland
You can't possibly be serious...
notarookie
surely ???
ppcflyer777
For some GA airplanes, after touchdown, that can help. That is not how you do it in this jet or any other that I am aware of.
rartac
From 22 to 45 flap is mainly drag so raising the flaps is useless whilst landing. It doesn't appear the flaps even made it to 45. Flaps 22 is very common to land with at the regionals in this plane. Plus, the slow speed of the electric flaps means by the time they're up you're parked at the gate practically.

로그인

계정을 가지고 계십니까? 사용자 정의된 기능, 비행 경보 및 더 많은 정보를 위해 지금(무료) 등록하세요!
이 웹 사이트는 쿠키를 사용합니다. 이 웹 사이트를 사용하고 탐색함으로써 귀하는 이러한 쿠기 사용을 수락하는 것입니다.
종료
FlightAware 항공편 추적이 광고로 지원된다는 것을 알고 계셨습니까?
FlightAware.com의 광고를 허용하면 FlightAware를 무료로 유지할 수 있습니다. Flightaware에서는 훌륭한 경험을 제공할 수 있도록 관련성있고 방해되지 않는 광고를 유지하기 위해 열심히 노력하고 있습니다. FlightAware에서 간단히 광고를 허용 하거나 프리미엄 계정을 고려해 보십시오..
종료