Tailwind and poor braking present before ERJ-145 excursion - FlightAware

← Back to Squawk list

44

Tailwind and poor braking present before ERJ-145 excursion

6달 전 제출됨

Preliminary indications suggest the Envoy Air Embraer ERJ-145 which suffered a runway excursion at Chicago O'Hare had landed with a tailwind in gusting conditions. (www.flightglobal.com) 기타...

Daniel Baker

31 멤버 코멘트

Sort type: [Top] [Newest]

airuphere 6달 전 8

If you watch the video... looks like they should of kept going on the rwy - breaking action wasn’t good enough for that high speed taxi way.. they had runway left..
Video Link FYI —>>. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=quMUAwp_szk

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Report

Matt Kladder 6달 전 6

I also am of the opinion that there is NO way they were trying to turn off on a reverse high speed on snowy conditions. They appear to have begun to lost control long before they were at P4,

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Parent•Report

Robert Artac 5달 전 1

I think the absolutely were shooting for the high speed. The flaps are at 22, which indicates to me the pilots were simply going through the motions and hadn't considered the variables in play. "Well, we ALWAYS exit at P4 becuase that's where the gates are". Happens all the time.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Parent•Report

william baker 6달 전 3

Like i said before they were trying to turn off at P4 from what the FAA was saying and i got yelled at for it. They were going way to fast for that turn off in any conditions.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Parent•Report

Andy Bowland 6달 전 3

P4 would have been a reverse high speed for them...almost no way they were trying to turn off.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Parent•Report

John Kiger 6달 전 4

Only a 9Kt tailwind. However the 24Kt gusting crosswind on a marginal surface condition could be fun.....

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Report

Jason Bowman 6달 전 3

I bet they just weathervaned in the crosswind.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Parent•Report

Robert Artac 5달 전 1

Incorrect. The aircraft yawed left, indicating a left to right crosswind. The aircraft would jave slid off the RIGHT side of the runway, not left, according to your theory. You can't drift upwind if you're skidding.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Parent•Report

ppcflyer777 5달 전 1

That's what it looks like. I believe they said the runway condition at the time was 1/1/1

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Parent•Report

Sven Freitag 4달 전 1

9 kts tailwind is quite substantial, most airlines consider 10 an absolute cutoff as far as I know.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Parent•Report

WALLACE24 6달 전 3

Those conditions can bite the best of of pilots. Just because the previous traffic made it means nothing to the next guy. That said, the pilots will bear the heat, barring a mechanical failure, just because,

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Report

Antonello Davi 6달 전 2

am I wrong, I do not see the spoilers being deployed

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Report

Andy Bowland 6달 전 2

The outer panels are just that...panels. The spoilers are deployed right at the bottom of the screen or at the wind root.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Parent•Report

Robert Artac 5달 전 1

Spoilers are visible toward the end of the video. They aren't all that effective on this aircraft and dont span the whole wing.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Parent•Report

Tanman3880 6달 전 2

If you look at the AV herald article (link below) it shows an aerial image of O'Hare and the "approximate final position" of the plane. It appears that the plane veered left and skidded off on the "N-1" turn off which appears to be for planes landing on 28R (opposite direction). I'm no expert. Scary for sure.

https://avherald.com/h?article=4cf1eedf&opt=0

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Report

mbrews 6달 전 2

- Given the runway conditions and possible tailwind component, perhaps flight crew had an unfortunate case of Get-there-itis. Not sure what was their alternate, nor whether at the alternate.

Note the regional carriers only get paid to "move the rig" from point A to point B. Would be interesting to review stats on how many Regional flights end up diverting to alternates, versus how many Mainline flights involve a diversion

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Report

ppcflyer777 5달 전 1

The airline only gets paid for A to B but the pilots and flight attendants get paid by the flight hour.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Parent•Report

Robert Artac 5달 전 1

Took 11 seconds for TR full reverse (sounds like half or even idle deploy until then) Flaps appear to be in 22 degree position as well, not 45. 1/1/1 FICON plus a 9 kt tailwind? Yep, i think the aircraft performed as intended. The nuts behind the wheel failed. Performance decreases exponentially with tailwind. These guys were idiots.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Report

Pa Thomas 6달 전 1

"suffered a runway excursion"

Reading this crap is torture.......

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Report

Maxwell Johnson 6달 전 5

Could have been worse. Could have said "excursion from the tarmac."

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Parent•Report

notarookie 6달 전 3

I love tarmac & cheese

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Parent•Report

John Smythe 6달 전 2

Ya, I guess it would be politically incorrect to refer to it as a “ bit of a wipe out” but with a good ending.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Parent•Report

Kobe Hunte 6달 전 -6

So pilot error is to do with it?

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Report

Kobe Hunte 6달 전 1

I was just asking a question and got downvoted like crazy...

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Parent•Report

Robert Artac 5달 전 1

Absolutely. As stated above, barring any MELs or mechanical issue, pilots 100% to blame.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Parent•Report

Robert Artac 5달 전 1

Even then, MEL or mechanical issues, unelss experienced at the time of the departure from the runway, should cause a crew to plan accordingly.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Parent•Report

[This comment has been downvoted. Show anyway.]

Andy Bowland 6달 전 7

You can't possibly be serious...

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Parent•Report

notarookie 6달 전 1

surely ???

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Parent•Report

ppcflyer777 5달 전 1

For some GA airplanes, after touchdown, that can help. That is not how you do it in this jet or any other that I am aware of.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Parent•Report

Robert Artac 5달 전 1

From 22 to 45 flap is mainly drag so raising the flaps is useless whilst landing. It doesn't appear the flaps even made it to 45. Flaps 22 is very common to land with at the regionals in this plane. Plus, the slow speed of the electric flaps means by the time they're up you're parked at the gate practically.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Parent•Report

로그인

이 웹 사이트는 쿠키를 사용합니다. 이 웹 사이트를 사용하고 탐색함으로써 귀하는 이러한 쿠기 사용을 수락하는 것입니다.

종료

FlightAware 항공편 추적이 광고로 지원된다는 것을 알고 계셨습니까?

FlightAware.com의 광고를 허용하면 FlightAware를 무료로 유지할 수 있습니다. Flightaware에서는 훌륭한 경험을 제공할 수 있도록 관련성있고 방해되지 않는 광고를 유지하기 위해 열심히 노력하고 있습니다. FlightAware에서 간단히 광고를 허용 하거나 프리미엄 계정을 고려해 보십시오..

종료