Back to Squawk list
  • 5

Boeing 767 freighter suffers tail strike, but continues flying for 8 hours

A Boeing 767-300 cargo aircraft suffered a tail strike while departing from Tokyo, Japan, to Vancouver, Canada, but continued the flight and reached the destination around 8 hours after the incident. ( 기타...

Sort type: [Top] [Newest]

Cleffer 5
"Inspectors found a 31 meters long, 15 centimeters wide, and 2 centimeters deep rubbing mark, indicating that the tail of the aircraft had indeed contacted the runway surface. One of the runways lights, which mark a centerline, was also found damaged."

That's 91 feet long, a 1/2 foot wide, but only a minuscule deep of a dig into the runway.

So pretty long, but very shallow. Like my last relationship. HEYO.
Shows the quality built into the 757/767 line. 😁
I’m guessing that a Vr of 150 mph the tail contacted the runway for about 3/4 of a second. The aircraft would be travelling at about 65 metre per second at that speed.
Devil's advocate here,
I wonder if ATC notified the last departure. Otherwise it's won't be that easy for flight deck to hear the tail strike...
Interestingly Mentor Pilot just made a video no long ago talking about 737-800 hade a very serious tail strike, even hit the wall with the wheels, and pilots elected to continue untill the company told them to divert.
Coalora 2
That was Lion Air... which should tell you the safety consciousness of the airline. The crew aren't paid unless they continue their flight to destination.
Cleffer 2
They aren't paid if they die on the way there, either. :)
Greg S 1
Air India Express flight 611. That "tail strike" was actually a tail strike followed by striking and taking out part of the ILS array followed by the wheels smashing through the upper part of the perimeter wall.
Continuing a long overwater flight in a possibly unairworthy aircraft? I would have pulled the CYA card and opted for a return to save my career.
I believe the -300 is equipped with a retractable tail skid and if the strike is hard enough a warning message will illuminate on the EICAS system. Older aircraft (like the DC-8-63 ) had a fixed skid with a cartridge that would collapse into itself depending on how severe the strike. If the aircraft pressurized normally one could continue to destination and have maintenance check it out. More times than not, just the cartridge was replaced, which is a lot cheaper than dumping 30,000 lb of fuel to return. The flight engineer could also replace it from the spares kit on a turn around.
These are tanks and very well built. Not like the paper airplanes of today like the 787 etc.


계정을 가지고 계십니까? 사용자 정의된 기능, 비행 경보 및 더 많은 정보를 위해 지금(무료) 등록하세요!
이 웹 사이트는 쿠키를 사용합니다. 이 웹 사이트를 사용하고 탐색함으로써 귀하는 이러한 쿠기 사용을 수락하는 것입니다.
FlightAware 항공편 추적이 광고로 지원된다는 것을 알고 계셨습니까?
FlightAware.com의 광고를 허용하면 FlightAware를 무료로 유지할 수 있습니다. Flightaware에서는 훌륭한 경험을 제공할 수 있도록 관련성있고 방해되지 않는 광고를 유지하기 위해 열심히 노력하고 있습니다. FlightAware에서 간단히 광고를 허용 하거나 프리미엄 계정을 고려해 보십시오..