Back to Squawk list
  • 41

Airbus delays A321XLR to 2024 amid safety talks, sources

제출됨
 
TOULOUSE, FRANCE (REUTERS) — Airbus is delaying the development of its A321XLR jet by several months, pushing its arrival to 2024, as regulators tighten the rules to prevent fire risks, some industry sources said. (www.airlinerwatch.com) 기타...

Sort type: [Top] [Newest]


bartmiller
Both Boeing and Airbus are pushing their workhorse airframes, the 737 and A320, further and further. Clearly Boeing pushed too far with the MAX and here is a sign that the 320 (newer than the 737, of course) is being pushed to far.

Of course, it's easier (quicker and cheaper) to build on an existing frame than design a new one from scratch. Unless you push too hard without proper engineering oversights (like the MAX). Then it becomes really expensive.
21voyageur
Fair comment however I will take it to the next level if I may. Airbus has apparently chosen to date to not trump engineering with greedy aspirations and directives which, is what got Boeing to their current sad state (ie: self certification).
SkyAware123
exactly. See last weeks article about all the issues Boeing has.
SkyAware123
huh? what sign ? They're open about the design and the regulators said no. That's QUITE different than implementing a crappy system to overcome a terrible design and not tell anyone about it. Airbus is doing 10 times better than Boeing.
bartmiller
No arguments here about Boeing's mistakes, including technical ones and deceiving the public and regulators.

I was merely commenting on the airframes and the manufactures' desire to extend the missions that these airframes (and their derivatives) can handle.
mbrews
mbrews 7
Here are some facts from the article.

"...the delay stems from discussions with regulators about the certification of a novel fuel tank needed to boost its range in a battle for sales with Boeing

The European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) is looking at significant rule changes that would force Airbus to redesign areas of the lower fuselage known as "underbelly fairings", two of the sources said.

These composite external structures would have to be lengthened and redesigned in heavier metal to help contain fire in the event of a belly-landing.

Such work could add 6-9 months to the timetable depending on the scope of the final rule, one of the sources said. "
Lib4ever
Oh dear, this news has set the Boeing haters scrambling.

[This comment has been downvoted. Show anyway.]

21voyageur
21voyageur -1
Your meds are to be found in the bathroom cabinet, second shelf, left hand side.

21voyageur
21voyageur -9
Hmmm, sounds like Boeing may be fueling this "article" to divert attention from its serious woes. If so, sad and pathetic. My 2 cents.
Propwash122
Apparently Boeing submitted comments and concerns to EASA about Airbus’ conformal belly tank design concept. This could help Boeing by..
1) Delaying market entry by a competitor’s very capable aircraft
2) Getting a more thorough workout of this tank design through certification at Airbus’ expense, thereby making it easier/cheaper for Boeing to possibly include a similar tank in some possible future new Boeing airplane.
Pwak
Agreed

로그인

계정을 가지고 계십니까? 사용자 정의된 기능, 비행 경보 및 더 많은 정보를 위해 지금(무료) 등록하세요!
FlightAware 항공편 추적이 광고로 지원된다는 것을 알고 계셨습니까?
FlightAware.com의 광고를 허용하면 FlightAware를 무료로 유지할 수 있습니다. Flightaware에서는 훌륭한 경험을 제공할 수 있도록 관련성있고 방해되지 않는 광고를 유지하기 위해 열심히 노력하고 있습니다. FlightAware에서 간단히 광고를 허용 하거나 프리미엄 계정을 고려해 보십시오..
종료