Back to Squawk list
  • 52

BREAKING: Two Planes collide at DCA/Reagan National. Full Details unknown, DCA On a Ground Stop

Submitted
News reporting that a large fireball was seen as two planes collided midair and crashed into the Potomac River (www.nbcwashington.com) More...

Sort type: [Top] [Newest]


WhiteKnight77
WhiteKnight77 32
A second video has surfaced from a different angle and one can plainly see PAT 25 fly into the path or actually into the American Eagle flight. I cannot comment on whether or not that PAT 25 had ADS-B and had it activated or not, but from the CRJ, we can see that it was flying at 139 MPH and at 400' when it stopped transmitting. FAA approved Route 4 (as seen on the Balt-Wash_Heli.pdf sectional) has a specific maximum altitude of 200' MSL north of the Wilson Bridge.

Per the track of PAT 25 (Captain Steeeve uses the helo sectional to help illustrate all this) has the tracks of both aircraft from ATC radar overlaid on the sectional and one can see that PAT 25 is off the prescribed route even before the turn (and can be seen in the above link from the squawk above).

As former aircrew, I had my head on a swivel as SoCal traffic is horrendous and we had no such thing as ADS-B back then and the two biggest worries we had as rotorheads were fast movers (we often called them suck and blows) running us over from John Wayne or El Toro, or the occasional flights into March AFB (gear down and welded was the reply of the pilot one time when told to check gear down and locked). Flying at night has its challenges and trying to pick out other aircraft below one's altitude is not easy.

The big questions that very well may be unanswered is which aircraft did PAT 25 actually see? The aircraft on departure, the aircraft it ran into, or a 3rd aircraft behind the American Eagle flight that was going to be landing behind the lost flight.
baqwas
Matha Goram 4
Thank you for correctly summarizing the status quo to the best of my limited understanding.
TimDyck
Tim Dyck 2
Thank you for your comment. Maybe we will learn more from the investigation but I think there will always be a lot of questions we will never have answers too.
jmadunleavy
John D 6
Captain Steeeeve is the best. Like you, he's speculating PAT 25 may have had eyes on AAL 3130, A319 right behind it. I imagine the crew of AAL 3130 were quite traumatized by what happened right in from of them.
WhiteKnight77
WhiteKnight77 6
Captain Steeeve is who I first heard about the A319 coming in behind the CRJ from. Yes, it is speculation and that is all it will ever be since there were no survivors. Unfortunately, there may be several causes to this crash. The low and slow at the wrong altitude, overworked ATC, and misidentification of other aircraft in the area by the low and slow crew. I make this as an observer of the events as former aircrew of helicopters and do not discount any findings by the NTSB which has final authority for this.
alexa320
alex hidveghy 2
Yes, it’s called Human Factors and is a subject taught in initial and recurrent in most Part 121 airlines along with CRM.
Check out the Swiss cheese model for further explanations.
Not sure if this is taught in military aviation. Perhaps someone else can chime in there?…..
CapeCodder
CapeCodder 12
Military helicopter pilots and crews have to train day and night. That makes perfect sense. What doesn't make sense is why they have to train so close to the flight paths of one of the nation's busiest airports. I understand the need to fly in DC airspace for security purposes, but DC has a large metro area in which to train without being so close to the Reagan National runways. One more thing, why didn't the ATC shout to the Blackhawk pilot to abort the path instead of just calmly asking if he saw the CRJ seconds before impact?
WhiteKnight77
WhiteKnight77 7
Route 4 is the exact route both the Army unit and Marine Corps squadron HMX-1 would take into DC to get to prohibited areas P-56A (Capital Building and Mall to Washington Monument) and P-56B (White House). They were on a continuity of government proficiency annual check ride. One has to train the route one would fly into the area so getting in and out would be second nature. Flying the check ride out in Manassas does not work as landmarks are different.

During an actual emergency where the continuity of government flights are actually needed, one could seriously bet that all flights into and out of DCA would be halted and those in the air diverted, so HMX-1 and the Army's 12th Aviation Battalion could get into and out of DC with the President, VP, Cabinet and all of the members of Congress that is in town at the time out safely without having to worry about other "unimportant" traffic.

While I understand that the CRJ was flying IFR and was cleared to land, I do not understand why warnings of traffic were not issued to it as well as as the Blackhawk and sure, and I believe that ATC should have been a bit more concerned about which aircraft the helo saw and issued warnings of which direction the fast mover was coming from. That is not apparent in the released communications between the two.
alexa320
alex hidveghy 6
I think it’s clear to say that NEITHER aircraft saw the other, otherwise we wouldn’t be here talking about it.
I have read several reports from professional aviators, including UH-60 pilots, that give very plausible reasons on what likely led to this tragic accident.
It’s a classic case of Human Factors and the Swiss cheese model, sadly. I’m pretty sure the NTSB will publish a list of several probable causes rather than just one.
frankz
Frank Zokaites 11
I do not know what the helicopter was broadcasting, but this accident could and should lead to all governmental aircraft being required to broadcast their full ads-b at all times. Period. I see many Broward County Sheriff aircraft flying blind in the congested airspace surrounding Fort Lauderdale Executive Airport . As a pilot, I know the value of seeing traffic “on my screen” as well as visually. A change would benefit everyone.
bubblecom
Robert Fleury 8
Just another sad indication that VFR separation in dense TCUs especially at night is not a good or feasible option.
bubblecom
Robert Fleury 2
More so in the vicinity of IFR arrivals executing visual circling or dog legs manouvers without precise tracks or altitude restrictions.
alexa320
alex hidveghy 3
It’s never a good idea and likely would not have happened outside the US where aircraft traffic is more regulated and procedural, rather than “cleared for the visual”….i can’t imagine this happening at either LHR or LGW.
And I bet one of the changes will be change of procedures as well as closer monitoring of different types of traffic.
bubblecom
Robert Fleury 2
Agreed 100%
bubblecom
Robert Fleury 2
Investigators will probably find a way to put some blame on the tower as they almost always do. Being understaffed for example. That would be ironic, would it not, that the accident happened at the airport bearing the name of the very same guy who fired 12000 controllers in 1981? A fact I believe still has incidence on the overall service today.
Kolinh
Kolin Henderson 17
on youtube ATC shows the HELO climbing out of 200 while the CRJ was on approach. It initially turns right, assuming wanting to avoid the first aircraft, which ironically was also a CRJ ( 900 not a 700 which was the accident aircraft ) Then turns back ( WHY ) ----- maintains 200 for a min or so then starts to climb as the approach CRJ is descending...... at 200ft and the RJ at 900 initially, probably be hard to see the high speed CRJ on approach 700 above ? Such an avoidable accident for all involved..... gross...just gross
sprint113
sprint113 12
Most youtubers are showing MLAT triangulation of the Blackhawk's position, since they usually don't openly broadcast ADS-B. MLAT isn't the most accurate, especially at lower altitudes, and the margin of error can lead to position shifts that can appear as the helo turning left and right when it's simply flying straight. We'll probably need to wait for the investigation to conclude before we can have a better idea of the helo's maneuvers before the collision.
panam1971
panam1971 7
Any attempt to identify a cause at this point would be mere speculation.

[This comment has been downvoted. Show anyway.]

[This comment was deleted.]

charlie02vy
Helo hit the jet.
linbb
linbb -1
I think the poster covered that

[This comment has been downvoted. Show anyway.]

WhiteKnight77
WhiteKnight77 6
You should look up the cruising speed of a UH-60. I am sure it would surprise you. Let's just say that the cruising speed is faster than the approach speed that the American Eagle flight was at when the collision happened.
alexa320
alex hidveghy 3
Pray tell how that is a “fantastic assumption”?? The two videos - from different angles that millions around the world have seen, clearly, show the helo hitting the CRJ it was making the final turn to land in RWY 33.
And as an Esquire you should also know that the camera never lies.
That poster was making the statement that the helicopter hit the CRJ and not the other way around, that’s all. Late post but it still doesn’t negate what happened in who hit who. Speed is irrelevant in this situation and would have been Vref + for the CRJ at that level. So, quite low. Everyone was maneuvering in VFR so it’s see and be seen concept.
MikeInPA
Mike InPA 1
I'm curious. Could the helicopter not have flown just in front of the plane and then was hit?

Are the videos that definitive?
alexa320
alex hidveghy 4
I’ve seen 2 videos from different angles and both show that the helo hit the aircraft as the CRJ was making its turn. I’ve also seen something similar at a GA airfield a few years ago, be it two different fixed wing aircraft, one low wing, the other high, going for parallel runways.
Think about it, a fixed wing, low wing aircraft making a low level turn to the LEFT, is not going to see anything underneath that wing nor to the rear at all.
This is not even considering the ATC instruction telling the helo pilot to pass BEHIND the CRJ. To which there was no reply…..NTSB will find out all the details. Like they always do.
WhiteKnight77
WhiteKnight77 3
That is a possibility, hence why I posted as I did. Until the wreckage of both are brought up and thoroughly examined to see where contact points from rotorblades were at on the fuselage or where fuselage damage occurred, we will not know.
TimDyck
Tim Dyck 1
Does it really matter who hit who? One second difference and it would have been the other way around and two seconds might have been enough to make it just a close call. But within that first one second scenario neither aircraft would have been able avoid the other because there just isn’t enough time to react. You flew these birds, can you react and avoid a collision in that short of time? If so your a better pilot than just about any other pilot in history.
WhiteKnight77
WhiteKnight77 3
I never claimed to be a pilot. I was just along for the ride, but with the fact that the pilots could not even land unless I stated it was clear, even with clearance from ATC. Want to do a confined area landing (CAL), it was on me to get the bird into the zone with clear and concise instructions so as to not cut any trees down and damage rotorblades.

One other thing I had to do, ensure we did not get run into from behind. SoCal traffic is horrendous.
TimDyck
Tim Dyck 2
OK my mistake I misread your post. Either way you have a lot more experience the most and a better insight into what may or may not have been happening up there.
It was an accident that was likely caused by a number of variables any of which if different would have changed the whole incident. We have a natural instinct of wondering what went wrong and how could it have been prevented. Hopefully the investigation will be successful in finding the various causes and how to prevent future incidents.
Have a great day.
WhiteKnight77
WhiteKnight77 2
I's all good.

Even with age, I remember us using specific routes depending on where we were flying to, hence why I looked at possible routes in the DC area at the proper sectional (helo sectionals are only published for about 7 or 8 metro areas). There are any number of reasons as to why they collided. Once all the wreckage is pulled out, and can be examined, we should know more as to who hit who and where. I am curious as to the discrepancies in altitude as seen via radar, ADS-B and the CRJ data recorder. What does the Blackhawk's box show?
loopgroup1
I am not a pilot. I have flown on my share on civilian and military aircraft as well as jumped out of them at various levels. My question to those of you who are knowledgable is what constitutes an experienced pilot in terms of hours flown? I have seen that the pilot was said to have 1,000 hours experience. Is that experienced from your standpoint? Some very experienced rotary wing folks at my VA were surprised at the chopper being out of position especially given the location. Thanks in advance for your thoughts.
twschmidt4
twschmidt4 3
I'm not a pilot either. But my opinion is that the pilot may have 1,000 hours of flying experience, but how many hours of experience does he have flying in that type of airspace? Flying up and down, from here to there is different that flying in heavy traffic areas.
alexa320
alex hidveghy 2
Hard to say, but generally military pilots have far fewer flight hours compared to a civilian who may be flying almost every day.
However, I will say, that in order to have/obtain a full Airline Transport Pilot (ATP) certificate, you have to have at least 1500 flight hours logged. That takes time. All PICs of commercial aircraft will have the ATP and the majority, though not all, First Officers (co-pilots) as well.
Generally speaking, an airline like PSA will have pilots who are younger and with fewer hours as they are building up their career with many moving on to the majors after several years.
To get a good reference, I had several thousand as a private pilot and flight instructor before my first airline job - certainly much more than these military helo pilots.
You’ll also find that in other parts of the world, it is different with ab initio pilots flying A320s or B737 with a just 2000 hours total. Unheard of in the US, although some are starting ab initio training (from zero hours to airline standard) like UAL. Europeans have been doing this since the 70s.
I cannot speak for military pilot other than what I stated above.
WhiteKnight77
WhiteKnight77 1
The helicopter PIC had 5o0 hours while the IP had 1000 hours.
jsteiner
Jeff Steiner 11
Very nice use of quotes to make the link clickable!
TimDyck
Tim Dyck 5
Is that how to do it? Next time I post a link I will do that.
CHRISMORGAN
CHRIS MORGAN 6
There is a suggestion that the American Airlines flight was asked to change to a different runway fairly late in it's approach which may be significant. Given it's proximity to the White House I think it would be safe to assume that any aircraft movements in that area are monitored far more strictly than the norm which may help with any investigation into this tragic accident.
Our thoughts are of course with the families and friends of all those who have loss their lives on this terrible day.
Ace243
Cody McCall 15
The approach that the CRJ flew, approach 01 and circle to 33 is not significant or strange or dangerous. It is common and even "normal" here at DCA. If you listen to ATC tower audio the 2nd airplane behind the accident airplane, Bluestreak (PSA) 5347 asked for the same approach; circle to rwy33.
The helo, PAT25, was alerted to the CRJ on short final and claimed to have the CRJ in sight, and even responded to an ATC command to pass behind the CRJ.
It is strange that the tower did not call the CRJ to look for traffic.
It is also strange that apparently neither aircraft had a TCAS RA.
Sad.
ExCalbr
Victor Engel 11
It is not odd that they didn't have TCAS RA. Those are suppressed under 1000 feet because they don't want to advise someone to dive down into the ground.
AndrewSchmidt
Andrew Schmidt 4
From what I heard, the advisory maneuver commands are suppressed, but audio is still made until a much lower altitude.
Kolinh
I think PAT25 thought the first RJ ( the 900 ) was the one ATC was referring to....... odd they didn't maintain 200 and climbed as the RJ was descending - the landing lights on the RJ would have been hard to miss unless they lost spatial awareness and after they passed the first one, plainly stopped looking for traffic ... RIP
alexa320
alex hidveghy 2
Yes, neither pilot saw the other. PAT25 most likely y saw the other aircraft and not the CRJ in question. Easy enough mistake to make, especially at night and at low level with maneuvering aircraft..
AndrewSchmidt
Andrew Schmidt 3
I believe the accident aircraft CRJ was asked by the *tower* to accept Runway 33 which they agreed to. I haven't heard any audio after the crash, but I note in your post you mention "Bluestreak (PSA) 5347 asked for the same approach; circle to rwy33." So I am curious why would an arriving plane already set up for the runway 1 approach ask for the circle-to-land to a shorter runway (assuming there was not a great deal of head winds they'd be then using to shorten the landing distance)?
alexa320
alex hidveghy 3
He didn’t ask for it, he accepted the request from ATC, the one who did the asking. ATC likely did that so they could clear a departing aircraft off the much longer RWY 01. Common thing at DCA from what I hear.
jsteiner
Jeff Steiner 13
Blancolirio explains the approach in this 7 minute video: "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ouDAnO8eMf8"

Basically, ILS to runway 1 with planned visual switch and dogleg to 33
jsteiner
Jeff Steiner 3
Also, Victor @VASAviation has the ATC audio, including a separate link which has PAT25 acknowledging traffic in sight and requesting visual separation.

Full audio: "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CiOybe-NJHk"
PAT25 focus: "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r90Xw3tQC0I"
Propwash122
Peter Fuller 6
The flight track of the airliner as shown by FlightAware looks like initially a straight-in approach to 1, then a course change to the right to line up for 33. Whether that’s true or significant will be determined by the NYSB investigation.
alexa320
alex hidveghy 5
ATC asked the CRJ if they could accept RWY33. They said yes. That’s it. Reasons? See my post above and how they operate at DCA.
twschmidt4
twschmidt4 2
Thanks, missed that.
alexa320
alex hidveghy 2
You’re welcome! There’s a lot to sift through here….
twschmidt4
twschmidt4 1
Why did ATC ask him to change?
baqwas
Matha Goram 3
Rush hour?
RidgewoodNJ
Barry Morse 2
With CRJ in a left, circling turn to runway 33 and the helicopter coming from the right and below, the underbelly of the CRJ would have been oriented toward the helicopter. Directional landing lights obscured from view. Anti collision light obstructed by the vertical stabilizer, cabin windows tilted away. Navigation lights possibly visible, but not recognizable due to the bank angle. The CRJ may have been an invisible ghost ship to the helicopter. Not a good arrangement for night VFR.
TimDyck
Tim Dyck 3
Let’s not forget all the lights behind the aircraft. Videos from the ground show a lot of city lights beyond the aircraft but from their perspective many of those lights would be behind creating light pollution that makes the other aircraft just another set of lights in a mass jungle if lights.
Bursk
Randall Bursk 2
No public comments. Let the investigation handle it. 1-2 years. Handled at the highest level.
BryanTatem
Bryan Tatem 2
WTF you ever need to accept 33 but for the obvious reason. No more cross runway roulette at Reagan. KISS. As they say.
alexa320
alex hidveghy 4
Well, according to several other reports I’ve read, it’s common for the controllers to ask for a dog leg to the shorter RWY 33 when established for 01. It’s usually so they can clear a departure off the much longer RWY 01. Whether to accept that is up to the PIC of the landing aircraft and not everyone does. For various reasons.
But, you can bet procedures will be one of many things that will change as a direct result of this accident. They always do.
tmshum
Tak Sum 2
Possibility of an altimeter setting error?
jkeifer3
Joe Keifer 2
I've heard that the UH-60 did not have a CVR installed, and I have also heard that the "black box" in the Black Hawk was a combination FDR and CVR.

My question would be what was going on in the cockpit of the UH-60 leading up to the time of the accident? Was the cockpit "sterile" as would, or should, be the case of a commercial airliner on final approach to an airport or was the flight crew possibly distracted from their mission chatting about things other than the mission at hand?

Depending on whether or not there is recorded evidence of what was being said of the flight deck of that UH-60, we may never really know and the NTSB's findings will not be entirely complete and subject, possibly, to conjecture.
mbrews
mbrews 3
Weather on that day had strong winds from the west. The Blackhawk call sign PAT 25 was on a training mission, having departed Belvoir Virginia.

It’s a common thing at Washington DC Potomac region to see the Green military helicopters operating at low altitude above the Potomac river . RIP to the victims
tjperez927
Tony Perez 1
Do Blackhawks have TCAS?
ColinSeftel
Colin Seftel 10
Tony, TCAS advisories are inhibited below 1,000 ft AGL
Bayouflier
Bayouflier 5
TA/RA may be inhibited below 1000ft but you can still see approaching traffic and their relative altitude.

[This comment has been downvoted. Show anyway.]

[This comment was deleted.]

avionik99
avionik99 5
Military aircraft do indeed turn off their adsb often. I know as I worked several of their jets and track them using the adsb site. Most often the U-2's do not use theirs. Other aircraft will turn theirs off when flying in formation.
MichaelDealey
Michael Dealey 2
I'm no expert, but maybe this will mean something to you:
"https://youtu.be/A5NJc2sNzlk?si=ZIvjNBkjZwgnBaIF&t=1092"
TimDyck
Tim Dyck 1
Thanks for the link.
MrJeffBigg
MrJeffBigg 3
Does the helicopter run ADS-B?
Moviela
Ric Wernicke 5
Yes. That portion of the helicopter corridor limits altitude to 200 ft. The collision happened at about 400 ft. Controllers were heard asking if the Helicopter saw the jet, I would have thought they would tell them to descend.

[This comment has been downvoted. Show anyway.]

avionik99
avionik99 4
There is an adsb website that allows you to track flights. One mode is military and their aircraft including helo's show up all the time. So it can be assumed that it was used on this helo also.

[This comment has been downvoted. Show anyway.]

avionik99
avionik99 11
Well I was a guy who installed and maintained the ads-b system on AF T-38's. Google the difference between the 2 I don't have time to teach it.

[This comment has been downvoted. Show anyway.]

Moviela
Ric Wernicke 3
I regularly see military Helicopters on my ADS-B receiver. Not that they always use them. When Air Force 1 flew over my antenna there was no signal, nor any from the helicopters and the Osprey involved in executive transportation in Los Angeles. It was fairly obvious what it was because the airspace over LA went almost blank for a few minutes.
charlie02vy
I have read the helo onl;y had their transponder on and in mode-S
chandrahas
So sad.... Human Errors are inevitable even after hours of training..
BachJS1748
Rob Gaik 1
I like this Control Tower view. As stated in the article, it is “ cool that customers could see where they are on the airfield. It’d be great to have that airfield terminal level where you could actually see where you're at. As an aviation enthusiast, I look forward to using this on my next flight.
nonsync
Jim Magee 1
Could the Blackhawk's rotors obscured the pilot's view of the CRJ avoidance lights?
varneyland
Brian Varney 1
Thanks Jeff Steiner for the 7-minute video. That and Meg from Flying Magazine’s printed comments are the best analysis I’ve seen.
stardog01
stardog01 1
The two aircraft were roughly flying toward each other. How did the helicopter pilots not see the extremely bright landing lights of the jet? I assume the helicopter pilots were using night vision. But don't you still see lights when using night vision?
ExCalbr
Victor Engel 8
Very roughly - more like from the side. Those lights are pretty directional.
HORNETDRIVR
Mike Taylor 4
I don't think they were using NVG in that very bright environment. They would have been washed out with so much light. We only used them in very dark environments, not well-lit urban areas like that.
TimDyck
Tim Dyck 2
From the perspective of the video it seems obvious but from the helicopter’s perspective maybe not be so simple. The helicopter would be higher and the light pollution from the city is behind the oncoming plane making it just another set of lights in a feild of lights.
s25843
Dan Suslavich 1
PSA Flight 5342 ICT-DCA

https://www.flightaware.com/live/flight/JIA5342/history/20250129/2328Z/KICT/KDCA
jesse12801
Jesse Maiolo -1
If I’m off base here tell me. Did
That look deliberate to anyone else? After seeing the video it appeared the chopper had plenty of time to turn or increase altitude or go lower but it went straight for the plane.
fireftr
Dale Ballok -4
Of course it was, and it’s all Trump’s fault! There could be no other explanation!
jesse12801
Jesse Maiolo 0
😂 sure it was.
avionik99
avionik99 0
Did anyone else get over 6 copies of this in their email?
BryanTatem
Bryan Tatem -2
Reagan is not dual runway airport. Been playing games with people too long. 1/19 only.
jcatherton
John Atherton -5
Your comment is uninformed and inappropriate.

[This comment has been downvoted. Show anyway.]

Propwash122
Peter Fuller 5
Mr. Atherton stated “Your comment is uninformed and inappropriate”, but he posted it as a new comment, rather than as a reply to an existing comment. Therefore no one could tell to which comment he was responding.
jcatherton
John Atherton 3
My note referred to your post commenting on an accurate comment by Charlie Roberts (of over a day ago). Your comment to his note has now been down-voted and is no longer visible. How my note ended up attached to your ADS observation is something that FlightAware will have to address.

[This comment has been downvoted. Show anyway.]

CHRISMORGAN
CHRIS MORGAN 12
Perhaps it would be a little wiser to see exactly what the crash investigator teams have to say before claiming you know what caused the disaster. Occasionally a number of very small incidents, when they come together, can go on to create a major problem. I'm not saying that is what happened here but let us wait until ALL the information is in before jumping to conclusions.

[This comment has been downvoted. Show anyway.]

CHRISMORGAN
CHRIS MORGAN 6
I have seen the NTSB statements, I believe they hope to have a preliminary report in 30 days. AS to my aviation background - just a frequent flyer, and zero personal experience of ADS-B although fully conversant with AIS relative to shiping.
I think it extremely disingenuous to suggest that the NTSB will "sit on" vital information relative to the crash - I wonder what it is that you think they are trying to get away with, and to what purpose? Aircraft are very complex pieces of machinery operating in a very complex environment and finding all the answers to this tragedy will take time. You may "suspect" what caused the crash but the NTSB inspectors have "prove" the cause. That takes time and we should acknowledge it.

[This comment has been downvoted. Show anyway.]

CHRISMORGAN
CHRIS MORGAN 3
I suspect it will only be a small number of people who would recognise your definition of "The function of government"

In the marine world, rather like aviation, we use radar, radio, port control, designated navigation channels, waypoints and AIS showing course and speed of nearby vessels (all, of course, at sea level !!) so perhaps not quite as clueless as to the function of ADS as you would suggest.

As to certification, there are many instances in which breaking the rules can have serious consequences, including loss of certification, and surely that is as it should be.
zuluzuluzulu
zuluzuluzulu -4
6686L
Thank you for coming in here and typing "Bot". Confirms my prejudice as to who and what so many contributors in here are all about.

[This comment has been downvoted. Show anyway.]

[This poster has been suspended.]

fireftr
Dale Ballok 3
Exactly! Some of these posters act like stay at home housewives, that think they need to know everything about everything, like questioning a car accident.
FromtheRight
Michael Reynolds -3
The name and documented experience of the co-pilot of the military helicopter that was involved in the aviation tragedy might be of some Flight Aware reader interest.

[This poster has been suspended.]

ewrcap
ewrcap 10
Michael is just dying to know if there was a FEMALE anywhere in this scenario so he can scream DEI! Because the knuckle dragging troglodytes know that all women are incompetent and white males NEVER make mistakes flying airplanes. You know, like Tenerife, AA A-300 at JFK, UA at PDX (twice) USAir at LGA (twice) DAL at DFW (twice) NW at MSP (twice)….
jmadunleavy
John D 6
Took the words right out of my mouth.
TimDyck
Tim Dyck 1
It’s a military helicopter so she would be a military pilot and finding any information on her would be a lot more difficult.
alexa320
alex hidveghy 0
Why exactly is that? You have a ready-made agenda if you knew the answer? What if yoyre wrong? What say you then?
WhiteKnight77
WhiteKnight77 1
The Army will release the name of the aircrew of PAT 25.
michaelteigen11
MICHAEL TEIGEN -2
American, Delta and United Legacy Carriers must be given mandatory full control of DC Ronald Reagan National Airport. Ban US Military Operations 60 miles from the geographic center of DCA. Ban ALL LCC, ULCC Carriers. Ban Express Feeder Passenger Carriers associated with the legacy carriers. Ban ALL General Aviation business. DHL, Fed-Ex, UPS, USPS must follow mandatory procedures requested by legacy passenger carriers. ALL cargo carriers not associated with the aforementioned cargo carries must be banned. Mandatory hours of operations 0630 -1800, NO EXCEPTIONS.
Propwash122
Peter Fuller 3
Well, as long as we’re indulging in fantasy:

Reimpose the perimeter rule to limit length of flights allowed to/from DCA. Long flights serving the west coast, Denver, etc. can use IAD or BWI. In conjunction with this, reduce the slot limit at DCA to what can reasonably be handled by runway 1/19.

Move all flights to IAD and BWI, bulldoze DCA, convert the land to a park and/or satellite space for expanding Arlington National Cemetery.

Engineer a trade: military gets DCA, convert Joint Base Andrews to a commercial field. Improve road connections to Andrews. Extend the Metro green line from its current end at Branch Ave to Andrews.

[This comment has been downvoted. Show anyway.]

[This poster has been suspended.]

6686L
Here's a late news flash. Most aviation activity here in the USA is in "controlled airspace" of one kind or another.
Propwash122
Peter Fuller 3
…..which is pretty much why said intensively used airspace became controlled airspace.

[This comment has been downvoted. Show anyway.]

Login

Don't have an account? Register now (free) for customized features, flight alerts, and more!
Did you know that FlightAware flight tracking is supported by advertising?
You can help us keep FlightAware free by allowing ads from FlightAware.com. We work hard to keep our advertising relevant and unobtrusive to create a great experience. It's quick and easy to whitelist ads on FlightAware or please consider our premium accounts.
Dismiss