Back to Squawk list
  • 43

Harms of Post-9/11 Airline Security

제출됨
 
One, we are not doing the right things: the focus on airports at the expense of the broader threat is not making us safer. And two, the things we are doing are wrong: the specific security measures put in place since 9/11 do not work. ... At this point, we don’t trust America’s TSA, Britain’s Department for Transport, or airport security in general. We don’t believe they’re acting in the best interests of passengers. We suspect their actions are the result of politicians and government… (www.schneier.com) 기타...

Sort type: [Top] [Newest]


HIZZHONER
ding, ding, ding ...WE HAVE A WINNER! The rush to secure the airports was indeed a political action and not based on intelligence and reason. If you had said this four years ago somebody would have yelled "treason"...maybe the country is returning to its senses.
MrTommy
MrTommy -1
We can only hope... But, unfortunately, I have my doubts.
xmacfly
So far the terrorists have accomplished their objective of disrupting and altering our way of life. Fearful populace means they win. Pure theater - I think a tragedy. People living in fear are much easier to control.
JetMech24
JetMech24 -1
You would be right if anyone is in fear, I don't know one person that doesn't fly because they are afraid of terrorists, people fly because we have the security we do, if we didn't, no one would fly.
rick737
Honestly, I fly less because of the kabuki theatre security system. When I do fly, I know the last line of defense is me and everyother able body passenger and crewman. In fact, I'd love to have Grandma's knitting needles to place firmly in a terrorist eye, but they were left at security. Guess the good guys will have to improvise because of the TSA not seeing the forest fore the trees.
JetMech24
Assuming you can even fight, of course, but they can get them just easily as you can.
rick737
That's comment sound like 2 AM in a biker bar. And yeah, they can get em, but unless they bought 50% of the tickets, they're underdogs. I don't care how bloody it gets as long as the islamic terrorist don't use the jet to knock down a building
JetMech24
Apperently you've never been, it's usually a bit more blunt. 2 AM at work comment is what it was, but it's actually still only 10 PM, so it is looking up.
rick737
Passengers and crew are the line in the sand that will stop hijackings. Xrays, patting down granny, or confiscating butter knives, and muffins will not replace the desire of people on board an aircraft to safely arrive back on earth. As we spend billions on the Kabuki Theatre that is airport security, the terrorist laugh and plot their next big thing that doesn't include aircraft. Hey, Ms. DHS secretary, spend our tax dollars looking for the bad guys, not groping 5 year olds
JetMech24
How will they stop a bomb that they don't even know is there?
rick737
There's equipment in every major city that detects bomb materials. In the closed environment of an airport terminal, it could placed anywhere and everywhere. A bomb sniffing dog is sent in when a hit takes place. Very simple, Jet.
JetMech24
1. That did not answer my question as to what the people on board a jet will do to stop a bomb from exploding that is already on the plane. 2. The equipment is made to detect BOMB materials, as you said, not common household materials that can be combined to make a bomb.
iflyfsx
iflyfsx 2
Wrong, Jet. The scanners do not detect bombs. They never have, and they never will, because they were not designed for it. Do a little homework. They can only detect a bulge where someone *might* be hiding explosives, but this is very easy to bypass.

The scanners have only two purposes: To make a fortune for the manufacturer, and to fool idiots into a false sense of security. They have been a success in those two categories, and only in those two categories.
WALLACE24
I still find it hard to believe we have this many people trying to provide some meager level of security to just one industry. A damn airplane ticket ought to be $3000.
JetMech24
I was not talking about the body scanners at airports.
iflyfsx
iflyfsx 1
OK, my mistake.
JetMech24
Whine, whine, whine... blah, blah, blah... lol
CaptainArt
This has always reminded me of what Al Gore did with his so called Global warming. He has made a ton of money of it and no one can debate the issue with out losing a grant or getting fired. Check on it. Some one made a ton of money of this so called security run by rejects for the most part. Most of these kids doing the so call checking where unable to find a job. I am so happy that my family and I fly our own plane except when my youngest daughter had to go to New Zealand. She hatted it.
nedlitam
Stunning response. Stunning.
alistairm
Start connecting the dots people. Don't be afraid of the truth.
psychfred
Wow, Great article! Right to the point and nobody could spin that. You should run for office. I'd vote for you.
sparkie624
WOW, exactly what I have been saying for along time. Hit the nail on the head.
XWING
XWING -1
Michael Chertoff is laughing all the way to the bank in a Halliburton supplied bullet proof car.
WALLACE24
Pretty well nails it! We're fixated on airlines. Best security is to know thy neighbor and be vigilant. Government security is the ones that let the terrorists in the country in the first place.
XWING
XWING -2
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/11/23/fear_pays_chertoff_n_787711.html
iflyfsx
iflyfsx -2
How do I give this a million thumbs up?

로그인

계정을 가지고 계십니까? 사용자 정의된 기능, 비행 경보 및 더 많은 정보를 위해 지금(무료) 등록하세요!
이 웹 사이트는 쿠키를 사용합니다. 이 웹 사이트를 사용하고 탐색함으로써 귀하는 이러한 쿠기 사용을 수락하는 것입니다.
종료
FlightAware 항공편 추적이 광고로 지원된다는 것을 알고 계셨습니까?
FlightAware.com의 광고를 허용하면 FlightAware를 무료로 유지할 수 있습니다. Flightaware에서는 훌륭한 경험을 제공할 수 있도록 관련성있고 방해되지 않는 광고를 유지하기 위해 열심히 노력하고 있습니다. FlightAware에서 간단히 광고를 허용 하거나 프리미엄 계정을 고려해 보십시오..
종료