Back to Squawk list
  • 21

FAA To Block Erroneous ADS-B Signals from Aircraft

제출됨
 
Starting January 2, the FAA will implement a filter for certain ADS–B equipped aircraft found to be broadcasting erroneous or improper information that could affect the safe provision of air traffic services. (www.ainonline.com) 기타...

Sort type: [Top] [Newest]


TechnoDan
I'm *assuming* that this filter will be a software one in ATC systems, but I don't know. Anyone have any idea what this filter might be? It's sure not clear from the article.
tjperez927
So we've reached the age when we need spam-blockers for airplanes.
ericcarlson
Yes that appears to be true. You can read the federal register for more details. https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2017-12-20/pdf/2017-27202.pdf
TechnoDan
Thanks.
bartmiller
This is a very interesting area. I regularly see traffic reports from aircraft identified at 00000000. So, there are definitely misconfigured ADS-B units out there.

While the ground-based stations might filter out this information, it's not clear that it will have any effect on what we see in the cockpit.

They specifically mentioned filtering for "erroneous position reports", which is to try to prevent the intentional or unintentional spoofing of aircraft position.

In general, the FAA has moved to some disturbing positions.

1. Using ADS-B OUT to locate aircraft (and depend less on ground-based radar) provides many opportunity for an aircraft to hide or misreport their position. Even without malicious intent, any error in your aircraft GPS unit will cause your position to be misreported. Not good in busy airspace.

2. The FAA is actively decommissioning ground-based navigation stations (the VOR network), and depending on GPS. While I love my GPS units, GPS is a very fragile system, operating at quite low power levels (so easily jammed or disturbed). Without a good back-up network of ground stations, a system- or region-wide failure of GPS could create chaos and a resulting high-risk scenario.

(There is a fairly low-priced new technology that could be deployed instead of VORs, called eLoran, a very cool updated technical descendant of Loran-C. It would make an incredible, cost effective ground-based secondary global navigation system.)
RRKen
I get at least five misidentified aircraft a week from my ADS-B monitoring location in North Iowa. I was wondering when the FAA would get around to getting aircraft owners to properly configure their transponders.
BeechSportBill
AND can you imagine - that MILITARY AIRCRAFT have NO requirement to have ADS-B anytime in the near future...
Bernie20910
So, instead of addressing the problem with fines and other measures to ensure compliance with the required standards, the FAA has decided the best way to handle this is pretend it doesn't exist and pull the blankets (filters) over their heads? Have I got that right?

로그인

계정을 가지고 계십니까? 사용자 정의된 기능, 비행 경보 및 더 많은 정보를 위해 지금(무료) 등록하세요!
이 웹 사이트는 쿠키를 사용합니다. 이 웹 사이트를 사용하고 탐색함으로써 귀하는 이러한 쿠기 사용을 수락하는 것입니다.
종료
FlightAware 항공편 추적이 광고로 지원된다는 것을 알고 계셨습니까?
FlightAware.com의 광고를 허용하면 FlightAware를 무료로 유지할 수 있습니다. Flightaware에서는 훌륭한 경험을 제공할 수 있도록 관련성있고 방해되지 않는 광고를 유지하기 위해 열심히 노력하고 있습니다. FlightAware에서 간단히 광고를 허용 하거나 프리미엄 계정을 고려해 보십시오..
종료