Back to Squawk list
  • -6

Pilot error and mechanical fault caused Bedford Gulfstream G-IV accident

제출됨
 
Pilot error along with mechanical fault has caused the fatal accident involving a Gulfstream G-IV business jet in May 2014 at Bedford, Massachusetts, according to NTSB investigation. (www.aviationanalysis.net) 기타...

Sort type: [Top] [Newest]


LoralThomas
Here goes another knee jerk reaction to a flight crew who habitually neglected to do pretakeoff checklists. Had they done so, this accident wouldn't have happened.

bentwing60
I mostly agree as I religiously exercise the full range of control motion but there is still something smelly about the ability to get throttle range of motion but no flight controls. Not supposed to be that way.
preacher1
Well, flying the same aircraft all the time it is easy to get complacent or bypass some things on the checklist at times but control locks aren't one of them. That said, I am like your post above. Why was power able to be applied with locks on? That is a Grumman thing. Didn't they make a correction and offer a retrofit after this accident?
Highflyer1950
like I said in a previous post: If you start the engines with control lock on, then take the lock off, without depleting hyd. press: you run the risk of hydraulically locking the flight controls, the throttles will operate normally. However, you are correct, always do a control check and it is in the checklist.
PhotoFinish
(Duplicate Squawk Submitted)

NTSB Live -Board Meeting : Gulfstream G-IV crash on takeoff - Sept 9th 9:30AM ET

On May 31, 2014, a Gulfstream G-IV airplane was destroyed after a rejected takeoff and runway excursion at Laurence G. Hanscom Field in Bedford. The two pilots, a flight attendant, and four passengers were killed.

Live Webcast: A link to the webcast will be available on the following page shortly before the start of the meeting: http://ntsb.capitolconnection.org/

Date/Time: Wednesday September 9, 2015, 9:30 a.m. ET

http://www.ntsb.gov/news/events/Pages/2015_Bedford_BMG.aspx
PhotoFinish
why is a link to original source material at the NTSB labeled Duplicate Squawk and thrown into a spam squawk, directing flightaware traffic to the website owned by the spammer:Registrant Contact
Name: Sainulabid Pothangodan
Organization: N/A
Mailing Address: Unniyalungal house, Malappuram Other 673642 IN
Phone: +91.9895824272
Ext:
Fax:
Fax Ext:
Email: [email protected]
Admin Contact
Name: Sainulabid Pothangodan
Organization: N/A
Mailing Address: Unniyalungal house, Malappuram Other 673642 IN
Phone: +91.9895824272
Ext:
Fax:
Fax Ext:
Email: [email protected]
Tech Contact
Name: Sainulabid Pothangodan
Organization: N/A
Mailing Address: Unniyalungal house, Malappuram Other 673642 IN
Phone: +91.9895824272
Ext:
Fax:
Fax Ext:
Email: [email protected]
PhotoFinish
Plus don't overlook that the spam came an entire day AFTER the original squawk linking to the NTSB source material/ live webcast.

로그인

계정을 가지고 계십니까? 사용자 정의된 기능, 비행 경보 및 더 많은 정보를 위해 지금(무료) 등록하세요!
FlightAware 항공편 추적이 광고로 지원된다는 것을 알고 계셨습니까?
FlightAware.com의 광고를 허용하면 FlightAware를 무료로 유지할 수 있습니다. Flightaware에서는 훌륭한 경험을 제공할 수 있도록 관련성있고 방해되지 않는 광고를 유지하기 위해 열심히 노력하고 있습니다. FlightAware에서 간단히 광고를 허용 하거나 프리미엄 계정을 고려해 보십시오..
종료