← Back to Squawk list

39

(Video) NTSB Chairman's Sunday Briefing on Asiana 214

10년 전 제출됨

Chairman Hersman's briefs media on Asiana flight 214, July 7, 2013 (www.youtube.com) 기타...

23 멤버 코멘트

Sort type: [Top] [Newest]

Roland Dent 10년 전 2

It is 30 years since I was last PIC. Now can some of you current people tell me WTF is going on here. Have the machines become so automated that the throttle is forgotton. Airbus have repeatedly called for "basic flying skills to be revisted".

So tell me...between the two of you...what exactly goes on with regard to the proximity of your hand with the throttle levers. When there were three crew members the engineer always always had aclose control of the the levers.

What is it with you current guys?

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Report

THRUSTT 10년 전 3

I fly with guys now that are so dependent on the autopilot and FMS. The FMS took a crap, and on two separate flights I had 2 15000 hr. FO's that couldn't hold a VOR radial from TEB to FL. No f ing concept of wind correction and they were lost when they got a crossing restriction with nothing to calculate it for them. So what did they do, they just descended about 100 miles early...

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report

Roland Dent 10년 전 1

My God...I see

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report

Barry McHugh 10년 전 1

Couldn't agree more!

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Report

bkintzele 10년 전 1

Fox news SFO covered this item very poorly http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WSw8MafUBM0&desktop_uri=%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DWSw8MafUBM0

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Report

Er.A.K. Mittal 10년 전 1

In one of the squawks else where certain data of speed and height have been mentioned by an expert reader. His last comment, rather a conclusive one, " quite a roller coaster ride " needs attention. Is it not possible that either the instruments were playing'hide and seek' or the environment? Latter is less likely. And by the time the pilot/s made a visual observation of proximity with the ground , it was too late for a corrective action ! The the oral evidence of the cock pit crew and the black box will give most answers. Let us not jump to conclusions of any kind.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Report

THRUSTT 10년 전 2

Yeah, and the cow jumped over the moon!!!

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report

Er.A.K. Mittal 10년 전 1

Bang on !

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report

Musketeer1 10년 전 1

It's refreshing to see a G-(WO)MAN doing their job well.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Report

Mary Blair 10년 전 1

I agree! She is like Joe Friday (for those old enough to rememger him) - just the facts. The amazing thing is she speaks slowly and distinctly so all the media circus can understand her...I am impressed!

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report

WALLACE24 10년 전 0

Low+slow+sink rate=?????

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Report

Roland Dent 10년 전 -1

You mean they are reading check lists and not looking out the window? Both of them? Maybe the machine was set to autoland? Long flight and asleep? Wrong data entered? Nothing wrong with the machine that is for sure.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report

WALLACE24 10년 전 0

Don't know where they were focused but it sure must not have been on as, vs, or even sight picture. I think it's called "asleep at the wheel".

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report

Roland Dent 10년 전 0

yeah..looks that way to me...and a fire truck ran over a 16 yr old kid?

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report

WALLACE24 10년 전 0

That is another sad story that probably shouldn't have happened. Hope the autopsy shows she was already deceased. Enough tragedy already.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report

Roland Dent 10년 전 0

Hope she passed without pain.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report

[This poster has been suspended.]

Er.A.K. Mittal 10년 전 0

Pilot error ? Too premature, too unprofessional, too hasty . Focus on ALL angles , or say , use wide angle vision which is the rule for EVERY type of investigation. Start process of elimination BASED on pieces of evidence as they emerge . Bundle them up and make a conclusive irrefutable decision . Not until then !

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report

WALLACE24 10년 전 1

When you are making a visual approach and you fly a functioning airplane into the ground short of the runway, good excuses are hard to come by.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report

Er.A.K. Mittal 10년 전 1

Will you agree that even mistakes occur due to some reason? There has to be some cause for the effect(error)? We all know fairly well the effect, whether in full details or partial, but what about the causes? Should we not wait for FULL oral evidence of crew of the cock pit and cabin, ATCers and passengers dully substantiated by data from FDR and CVR. Remember they landed short, BUT what prompted them to do so? Isn't landing short fatal whether the strip is around the bay or land? Aborting landing and the failure to abort are secondary and dependent issues.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report

WALLACE24 10년 전 1

I'm waiting to hear of something that contributed significantly to the crash other than the 3 pilots. If there is no mechanical failure they will receive a "piss poor piloting award" and some nice parting gifts.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report

Er.A.K. Mittal 10년 전 1

Prima facie, the Chairperson, NTSB, finds no error in the system, almost pointing finger towards pilots. But she hastens to add , no conclusions to be drawn until the final report.
I hold SAME views.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report

WALLACE24 10년 전 1

It ain't over till the fat lady sings, but I think she's warming up! Lol.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report

Er.A.K. Mittal 10년 전 1

May be, or may be she is preparing us for fictional mystery 1

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report

로그인

FlightAware 항공편 추적이 광고로 지원된다는 것을 알고 계셨습니까?

FlightAware.com의 광고를 허용하면 FlightAware를 무료로 유지할 수 있습니다. Flightaware에서는 훌륭한 경험을 제공할 수 있도록 관련성있고 방해되지 않는 광고를 유지하기 위해 열심히 노력하고 있습니다. FlightAware에서 간단히 광고를 허용 하거나 프리미엄 계정을 고려해 보십시오..

종료