Back to Squawk list
  • 54

Into the Wild (B-52 rescues lost Cessna)

While the Minot-based, seven-man crew B-52H Stratofortress, HAIL13, and their Barksdale wingman, HAIL14, were flying over Alaska, they received a call for help from the Anchorage Air Traffic Control Center. The whereabouts of a small Cessna plane had become unknown after its pilot became disoriented after flying into bad weather. ( 기타...

Sort type: [Top] [Newest]

One lucky Cessna driver and a "well done" to the A F guys. That's getting bang for the buck out of training time.
sparkie624 10
Hats off to the B-52... Great planes still finding new uses...
This is one of the same airplanes 1039 that I worked on (ECM) 45 years ago. Still flying strong. Good job guys.
Goes to show you what a Good Boeing can do and Great Maintenance can keep going. Great job to both Boeing and the Airforce. I bet there won't be any Airbus 380's flying in 45 years that are flying today :)
oliton 2
Jesus. Are you for real?
As real as can be... Do you expect any Airbus of any kind that is flying to day to be flying in 45 years... No way. The quality is not there. They are not built to last. They are built for 10 years and park. 727 from 1963, still flying today in good numbers, even though not as much in the US. The A310 which came out in 1982 is almost in Mothballs. Fedex is parking all of theirs, and I do not know of any A310's flow by any Main US Carrier.

Boeing makes great planes... Airbus makes Buses.
and after constant multi million dollar upgrades and sitting on the ramp most of their lives these airplanes should be still in use whereas commercial aircraft probably get more cycles in one year than these big boys get in ten
oliton 3
Sorry. I wasn't referring to the sturdiness and awesome achievement the B52 airframes represent (45 years and counting) but merely to the fact that you HAD to bash another manufacturer... Why even bringing it up? I really don't see the point. Airbus wasn't around 45 years ago. Peace, man.
...well played, oliton
honza nl -1
ah yes, all airlines who order thousands of Airbusses of course know nothing about that. Already applied for a CEO-post at an airline? They must welcome such talented people

[This poster has been suspended.]

not sure if based on cost as much as on politics American carrier wants to fly into Europe probably ought to buy a few air busses same way with European carriers- when Boeing builds aircraft their suppliers are from all over the world I work at a aircraft plant in Korea and they build parts for both Boeing and Airbus spread the wealth
Well, the old, Concord was British and French shared, but it was literllay 65% American engineering built. Those countres for instance knew nothing about titanium technlogy, it literlaly was an experiemnst for the U.S. to test out the B-1.
dg1941 1
And how much technology was "borrowed" by America from Europe?

I guess all sharing the worlds advancements, medicines, technology, discoveries is what makes the world do round. Good thing man shares..
Yes, sure, could be, maybe that's where the other 35% was from<?>.
This is less than half of the story. Great job B52 crew for being compliant with the atc controller.

The real story is this: the Cessna was a vfr pilot who got into bad wx and lost contact with flight service. Flight service informed atc that there was a 7700 squawk but they lost contact.
A "never say die" atc controller took the ball and brain stormed a way to get in contact with the Cessna. The only plane in sector was this b52 crew, an the atc controller contacted the b52 and through the b52 gave instructions to the Cessna 172 pilot to guide him to the nearest airport to land as he had no gps onboard.
Merry Xmas!
BZ to both crews for being able to help and still carry out their mission on time.
I know the 69th from when I was stationed with them back in the late sixties. They were agreat bunch back then and I was proud to play a small part in keeping the planes flying. Glad to see they are still as sharp as ever.. On target, on time, all the time.
Good news story. The text of the official AirForce release was a little Rah Rah. "After ensuring that their mission wouldn't be compromised" they went to look for the Cessna. I'd say that unless the crews were on a "special" mission that any training mission they were on just got changed to SAR.
God Bless the Hail 13 and 14, true angles of the sky.
Good show, guys. Anyone out there who served in SAC Travis 1963-4? Col Robert Smith commander.
What happened to aerial refueling? Why would fuel range be a problem? Doesn't the Air Force still have tankers? And why not burn extra pounds of fuel to save a life? Air Force One doesn't seem to worry about how much fuel they are burning!
In some minds today, we must always take a shot at President Obama. Sad world we live in. Good work SAC.
dg1941 1
It's not whether aerial refueling is available, but whether it's practical. These are eight-engined, 222 tonne bombers. Is it economical to refuel them without a dire need. If it were arranged, that would be a different story, but to scramble a tanker is somewhat of a complexity, not to mention a cost.
If a tanker could be scrambled, surely a more practical aircraft could be scrambled. As I read the article, neither were likely to have been practical.
yes and why not divert into one of the two big bases for gas if needed
You seem quite knowledgeable (hat's off) and wondered if you are still involved in that field. I was in headquarters duty at 69th in '64.
I wish there were more stories like this. That Cessna driver must have thought he was already dead and on the other side when he heard, "B-52's above your position..."
Some of the best air crews in the Air Force flying out of Minot AFB. Pretty harsh conditions to launch & recover in. Spent 4 years there with the 5th FIS. Great stuff to read about!
Marito57 1
Is nice when a Big brother help´s a small one nice job B52 guys
gftt 1
How cool is that?
It's nice to know that if needed the big guns will come to the rescue.
Thank you USAF and Thank you ATC.
This is the second article I read today explaining that the airport was able to turn up the lights to assist a plane in landing. Can someone expound on this? Are airport lights generally run at half power and only turned up in case of emergency? Is this normal? I've not heard of such a thing before. Now two articles the same day.
Lights at most airports have different intensities. When turned up they are sometimes way too bright during good weather. These high settings are usually only used during bad weather to shine thru fog, rain, or snow but would otherwise be blinding to the pilot.
Good work the bombers. Around 19996 a Cessna 310 got lost between airports FBSK and FBMN. An SAR launched included a C130B, After searching intensively on probable areas in the swampy Makgadikgadi Pans without a trace, the Herc crew extended the search the next morning, crossing the road NATA-MAUN. They spotted the Cessna and called a Bell 412 rescue. No fatalities, but all four seriously injured. A month later the funeral parlour company through a party in honour of the rescue team. It looks like biggies make better searchers!
The article states:

" One hundred miles into their detour, HAIL13 was able to locate and make contact with the pilot. He was flying low to the ground through a valley surrounded by rugged Alaska terrain.

"Because we were so high up, we were able to relay messages between him and ATC," explained Middendorf. "

If the Cessna was low and the B52 was high, how was it able to locate the Cessna in bad weather? Probably not visually, did they use radar or some other electronics?
A righteous diversion; Well done HAIL 13 and 14 crews!

Phil Wasden
Grand Forks AFB 1958-1961


계정을 가지고 계십니까? 사용자 정의된 기능, 비행 경보 및 더 많은 정보를 위해 지금(무료) 등록하세요!
이 웹 사이트는 쿠키를 사용합니다. 이 웹 사이트를 사용하고 탐색함으로써 귀하는 이러한 쿠기 사용을 수락하는 것입니다.
FlightAware 항공편 추적이 광고로 지원된다는 것을 알고 계셨습니까?
FlightAware.com의 광고를 허용하면 FlightAware를 무료로 유지할 수 있습니다. Flightaware에서는 훌륭한 경험을 제공할 수 있도록 관련성있고 방해되지 않는 광고를 유지하기 위해 열심히 노력하고 있습니다. FlightAware에서 간단히 광고를 허용 하거나 프리미엄 계정을 고려해 보십시오..