Back to Squawk list
  • 14

Boeing says Malaysia jet not subject to FAA inspection order

제출됨
 
Boeing Co on Wednesday said the missing 777 Malaysia Airlines jetliner was not subject to a new U.S. safety directive that ordered additional inspections for cracking and corrosion on certain 777 planes. The Federal Aviation Administration last week ordered additional, repeated inspections of certain Boeing 777 aircraft, warning that corrosion and cracking could lead to rapid decompression and damage to the structure of the aircraft. (uk.reuters.com) 기타...

Sort type: [Top] [Newest]


dan01ster
OZAIR....try to read and comprehend the subject story at the top of the page. Be sure to read the whole thing ie click on the "more" button.

"Boeing said it worked closely with the FAA to monitor the fleet for potential safety issues and take appropriate actions. But it said the 777-200ER Malaysia Airlines aircraft did not have that antenna installed and was not subject to the FAA order."
OZAIR
OZAIR 1
Anyway this was not the only directive that was recommended from memory there was another 2 that could potentially bring down a 777,1 involved the elevator,loss of elevator control,take your pick.....
OZAIR
OZAIR 1
While i am at it most Airline crashes involve Boeing aircraft.
mduell
More airliners are Boeings than any other make.
cuttlefish
OZAIR, a Pilot you ain't!

Like ummm, maybe there are MORE Boeings flying than other types and hence a higher % of crashes?

In any case, SERIOUS accidents involving major loss of life is won hands down by AIRBUS, read the stats Mate, and stop posting rubbish! Suspect you are a typical "wannabe" pilot!
OZAIR
OZAIR 1
Go to FAA website and read the directives yourself,then you decide.
OZAIR
OZAIR 1
The missing aircraft was a Boeing 777-200 from what i know and from what i read 777-200s had that directive on the FAA website 5 days ago,it doesn't matter that it was only for USA aircraft,they have a duty of care to ensure any potential defect that could cause an airliner to crash unexpectedly and cause mass loss of life to ensure other airlines follow suit to ensure all Boeing 777s no matter what country it fly's under knows and adheres to the directives.
If and I say IF this was a cause of the accident the Boeing and the FAA need their butts kicked and heads should roll.
OZAIR
OZAIR 1
Boeing and the FAA are saying that these directives do not apply to other airlines is like saying wind sheer at JFK only applies to USA aircraft and all others can be not told about the potential dangers ahead.Seriously ??
OZAIR
OZAIR 0
it doesn't matter anyway if it was a world wide directive or local flying school directive some companies will not get around to doing it because their lazy and incompetent or just greedy and can't afford to have aircraft on the ground.
Some previous crash investigations have proven this in the past.
OZAIR
OZAIR 0
so now they are saying the defects we find only concern American 777s.
I read the directives and it said all 777s including 777-200s 777-300s,maybe they altered it since then but that would be corruption.
OZAIR
OZAIR 0
Surely if a country finds a potential serious defect in a make of aircraft that other fly too legally the manufacture would have to pass on this information to the other countries or be liable for Negligence of some sort.
That would be grossly irresponsible by all involved and worthy of a jail sentence for the persons not ensuring the directive applied to all countries.
cgalliand
Craig G 0
(Duplicate Squawk Submitted)

US regulators warned of problems on Boeing 777s

Washington (AFP) - Months before Malaysia Airlines flight MH370 mysteriously vanished, US regulators warned of a "cracking and corrosion" problem on Boeing 777s that could lead to a mid-air breakup and drastic drop in cabin pressure.

http://news.yahoo.com/us-regulators-warned-problems-boeing-777s-153156057.html
DavidChouinard
(Duplicate Squawk Submitted)

What happened to MH370?

Has anyone considered if the below FAA Airworthiness Directive could be a clue the MH370 investigation?

A November 2013 FAA Airworthiness Directive for the 777

http://mh370lost.tumblr.com/post/79214607814/what-happened-to-mh370
mduell
It's not applicable.
OZAIR
OZAIR 1
of course its applicable.
preacher1
As many hatred comments as you have on here, it sounds like you have a big hard on for Malaysian Air. You may be justified in your belief but by your numerous rants you have discredited any point you are trying to make. Once is plenty. Mark has given you the Boeing link. What else do you want? Get over it!!!!!!!!!
mduell
See the story at the top of this thread:

Boeing Co on Wednesday said the missing 777 Malaysia Airlines jetliner was not subject to a new U.S. safety directive that ordered additional inspections for cracking and corrosion on certain 777 planes.
cuttlefish
Guys, forget OZAIR!

Be surprised if he is even a pilot, maybe private at best, but his in depth knowledge of the COMMERCIAL aviation is ZERO!

Just a typical WANNABE who likes to play with the professionals with his crazy, unsubstantiated and dumb posts!

I have just under 25,000 hours ALL in Boeings and Airbus aircraft plus 5,000 as a simulator instructor, not big noting myself but guys like OZAIR are in every forum, just ignore him and he'll go away?

I hope!
OZAIR
OZAIR 1
I read it and i read the directive from the FAA website 5 days ago.
bettiem
bettiem 1
@Ozair: I'm puzzled. How does whether or not you read it or when you read it make any difference?
OZAIR
OZAIR 1
I mentioned this on day 1 on these forums.

로그인

계정을 가지고 계십니까? 사용자 정의된 기능, 비행 경보 및 더 많은 정보를 위해 지금(무료) 등록하세요!
이 웹 사이트는 쿠키를 사용합니다. 이 웹 사이트를 사용하고 탐색함으로써 귀하는 이러한 쿠기 사용을 수락하는 것입니다.
종료
FlightAware 항공편 추적이 광고로 지원된다는 것을 알고 계셨습니까?
FlightAware.com의 광고를 허용하면 FlightAware를 무료로 유지할 수 있습니다. Flightaware에서는 훌륭한 경험을 제공할 수 있도록 관련성있고 방해되지 않는 광고를 유지하기 위해 열심히 노력하고 있습니다. FlightAware에서 간단히 광고를 허용 하거나 프리미엄 계정을 고려해 보십시오..
종료