모두
← Back to Squawk list
Airline CEO & Knight Says MH370 May Not Be Under Water
It has been over seven months since the Boeing 777-200 with 227 people on board disappeared without a trace (flightclub.jalopnik.com) 기타...
Sort type: [Top] [Newest]
I find that Reynolds Wrap makes far superior hats.
This is what is known as a conspiracy theory. What does he have to back it up? Has he analysed data to prove it wrong. Has he completed countless kinematic analysis and calculations? Is he privy to the investigation data beyond what is commonly published By the ATSB? Does he have official training in aircraft accident investigation? Just because of his status does not mean he ha any more ability the us who post here.
I think that malcom33 has the best, albeit sarcastic, theory:
"Obviously the tank used for chemtrails caught fire, incinerating everything and leaving no trace."
"Obviously the tank used for chemtrails caught fire, incinerating everything and leaving no trace."
Seems like he felt that knighthood allowed him to become the Oracle of Delfos, ready to espound truth and wisdom for everybody in the Aviation Community to sigh and admire. Why did he have to wait for such a long time to come up with another (crazy) theory as any of those exposed since this aircracfat vanished.
New World Order!!!!!!! Dude!!! check-DGA
[This poster has been suspended.]
What we all know is that no accepted proof of the location of the aircraft has been published. Mr. (now Sir) Tim Clark has a 'hunch' that the plane is not in the Indian Ocean based on the lack of located debris. I have a hunch that the authorities involved have not publicly released everything they know.
Absence of proof is not proof of absence. Somebody may know the location, but isn't talking for some reason. Remember that the news media does what it does to make a profit, not necessarily to distribute the unvarnished truth.
Absence of proof is not proof of absence. Somebody may know the location, but isn't talking for some reason. Remember that the news media does what it does to make a profit, not necessarily to distribute the unvarnished truth.
