Back to Squawk list
  • 18

Investigators find new clues pointing to potential cause of 737 MAX crashes as FAA details Boeing’s fix

Investigators find new clue in wreckage of Ethiopian Airlines flight as Boeing continues production of its 737 MAX and works on software patch to get planes back in the air. ( 기타...

Sort type: [Top] [Newest]

bbabis 3
Things are becoming a little clearer, to me anyways, after the myriad of stories and comments I've read.

1. MCAS was put on the MAX without enough information about its operation given to pilots and operators.
2. MCAS is not the direct culprit, a failure that triggers the MCAS system is the culprit.
3. Flight crews dependent on automation who rarely hand fly aircraft and lack basic flight and system knowledge (training) are most susceptible this and other system failures.
If these engines are positioned so far forward and cause such a huge pitch upwards at I’m guessing full rated thrust, why did the crew not reduce power? If they did I missed it somewhere. Also still no answer as to wind shear or CFIT recovery technique in this aircraft since I assume you can’t raise the nose attitude at full power while flying the aicraft in and out of stick shaker?
bbabis 1
Hey Highflyer, my guess as to why power was not reduced was confusion. As you well know, If a plane is level in hands off trim and power is reduced, the nose goes down. Here the nose was already trying to go down and the thought may have been don't make it worse. With a malfunctioning MCAS in the equation, reducing power may or may not have worked. Certainly disarming MCAS and manual trim would have, but the crew may have just been overwhelmed. It's similar to the pilots that get off the ground with reversed ailerons or the 737 crews that had rudder reversal. No matter how good the pilot, you may just not have enough time to figure it out before things are too far gone.

Your question on wind shear and CFIT is a good one. Possibly EGPWS disables MCAS? Probably not. These crews had to be getting EGPWS warnings also.
Cansojr 1
The sad part of this exercise is that we only learn from our errors after a great loss of life from "stirling" technology that fails our wisdom. My thoughts go out to the surviving families.

[This poster has been suspended.]

bbabis 2
When the fox is put in charge of the chicken coup, is it the fox or who put him in charge at fault for missing chickens?
Cansojr 1
How?...firing squads at dawn?
At my position on the totem pole, if I kill or injure someone, would be close to being shot . . . Guess the BIG boys and girls don't have to worry about it . . .
Totaly agree.
How about instead of dawn we make it the moment of impact for either aircraft? The number of shots should equal the number of souls lost.

Seriously though, if the fix is so easy that it could be rolled out this quickly why wasn't it done as soon as it was even suspected of being a factor in the Lion Air crash? That's a question a lot of lawyers are likely pondering right now, and once lawyers get involved there's usually a painful financial "extraction" that's eventually made. And that's not counting what the various governmental agencies may impose.
bbabis 1

Here is a very good article explaining How MCAS came to be, its operation, the flaws in its design and certification, what the Lion Air crew and probably the Ethiopian crew went through, and the proposed fix. It answered a lot of my questions.


계정을 가지고 계십니까? 사용자 정의된 기능, 비행 경보 및 더 많은 정보를 위해 지금(무료) 등록하세요!
이 웹 사이트는 쿠키를 사용합니다. 이 웹 사이트를 사용하고 탐색함으로써 귀하는 이러한 쿠기 사용을 수락하는 것입니다.
FlightAware 항공편 추적이 광고로 지원된다는 것을 알고 계셨습니까?
FlightAware.com의 광고를 허용하면 FlightAware를 무료로 유지할 수 있습니다. Flightaware에서는 훌륭한 경험을 제공할 수 있도록 관련성있고 방해되지 않는 광고를 유지하기 위해 열심히 노력하고 있습니다. FlightAware에서 간단히 광고를 허용 하거나 프리미엄 계정을 고려해 보십시오..