Back to Squawk list
  • 14

Lockheed Martin/Airbus tanker aircraft refueling system to be built in western Arkansas

On May 18, Lockheed Martin and Airbus leaders announced that the aerial refueling boom system for the LMXT strategic tanker aircraft will be manufactured by Airbus in western Arkansas. Introduced in September 2021, the LMXT is Lockheed Martin’s offering for the U.S. Air Force’s KC-Y strategic tanker program, according to a press release. The LMXT is built on the combat-proven design of the Airbus A330 Multi Role Tanker Transport (MRTT), which is the strategic tanking choice of 14 nations around… ( 기타...

Sort type: [Top] [Newest]

Sure, Arkansas has long been recognized as the epicenter of high tech employment.........
A replacement for the KC-46 already??
No. It is a bridge program to get to the KC-Z. The AF isn't buying enough KC-46s to replace all of the 135s. The KC-46 also isn't a direct replacement for the KC-10, which is already being retired.
joepre 1
Boeing dropped the ball on their tanker manufacturing with all of their delays, shoddy manufacturing and components not working. The AF is tired of waiting so they allowed Airbus to step in and provide tankers while Boeing tries to get their shit together. The way they have been going, I am not sure it will ever happen. They have no one to blame but themselves. Rags and tools found inside wings somehow doesn't build confidence...
Chris B 1
Let's hope that company doesn't screw it up. Go to the wiki page for the MRTT and you'll see an Australian AF MRTT refueling a USAF fighter with the US style boom.
Personally I prefer the d rogue system because you can refuel more Han one aircraft at a time.
I agree, but the flying boom is a USAF thing, probe and drogue is a USN thing. The big benefit of the boom is that once connected, it allows a faster refueling than the probe and drogue system.
Does the boom deliver as much fuel as two drogues at once. The key is the number and size of the aircraft to service and last I heard the USN and USMC have No Buffs, but a bunch of F18s that usually fly as a pair, or more. Mission utility is a thing.
The Marines don't pay as many no seat time generals as the USAF
Hopefully, that was a joke and you understand the reasoning behind our Wing v the mission of the Air Force.
If the sarc. font is broke here, don't blame me.


계정을 가지고 계십니까? 사용자 정의된 기능, 비행 경보 및 더 많은 정보를 위해 지금(무료) 등록하세요!
이 웹 사이트는 쿠키를 사용합니다. 이 웹 사이트를 사용하고 탐색함으로써 귀하는 이러한 쿠기 사용을 수락하는 것입니다.
FlightAware 항공편 추적이 광고로 지원된다는 것을 알고 계셨습니까?
FlightAware.com의 광고를 허용하면 FlightAware를 무료로 유지할 수 있습니다. Flightaware에서는 훌륭한 경험을 제공할 수 있도록 관련성있고 방해되지 않는 광고를 유지하기 위해 열심히 노력하고 있습니다. FlightAware에서 간단히 광고를 허용 하거나 프리미엄 계정을 고려해 보십시오..