Back to Squawk list
  • 22

Airport jetbridges not long enough to reach plane from terminal

제출됨
 
Monroe Regional Airport (KMLU) officials learned Tuesday passenger loading and unloading bridges at the new $36 million terminal are not being able to connect to airplanes....Your tax dollars at work. (www.thenewsstar.com) 기타...

Sort type: [Top] [Newest]


robot40
Wonderful. Why don't we have government do more for us--like running (or was that ruining) healthcare, etc.
sheka
mark tufts 0
i agree with you boyd and then make them pay for their mistakes
WALLACE24
WALLACE24 0
OOP! PAY UP TAXPAYER.
bishops90
Sounds more like a design problem. The Architects or Engineers must've miscalculated the length needed based on where the aircraft would have to park and where the doors on the aircraft are located. The Manufacturer of the jet bridges would have all the relevant specs and dimensions. I doubt seriously there could be such an error during construction. Door openings etc are pretty fixed dimensions in construction like that. If I'm not mistaken those jet bridges are pretty modular, so they should be able to add a section to them without it being a HUGE deal. PITA for sure, but not huge.

[This poster has been suspended.]

onceastudentpilot
and just think, it was a baggage handler that probably figured it out.....while everyone else was running around panicing and trying figure out how they were going to get the passengers off the arriving flights he/she stood there for a moment and said "why don't they just pull the plane closer".
preacher1
preacher1 0
Do you mean that COMMON SENSE AND PRACTICALITY actually prevailed here????????????lol
StymieHo
Well that's just funny.
linbb
linbb 0
Great the planners were hard at work on this one I wonder what else they missed? Doors to the building? Roof over it that doesnt leak? Who knows but the inspectors and others should have known from the start what was required and never have had this happen for any reason. Fire everyone that had anything to do with the planning of this.
indy2001
indy2001 0
I'm glad it was something that was easy to correct. But the comments on the original web site are absolutely amazing. They include everything from Blame Obama or Bush (your choice), it's a grab for our individual freedoms by the TSA, the local politicians' ineptness, and on and on and on. Funny in a way, but also pretty pathetic and sad.
kayjay58
Now lets see...... was that 69 or 96 feet?
jimquinndallas
Jim Quinn 0
I would think that the airport consultants/design engineers are sweating bullets on this one, as they should be.
navydoc192
Well, Someone sure screwed up!

로그인

계정을 가지고 계십니까? 사용자 정의된 기능, 비행 경보 및 더 많은 정보를 위해 지금(무료) 등록하세요!
FlightAware 항공편 추적이 광고로 지원된다는 것을 알고 계셨습니까?
FlightAware.com의 광고를 허용하면 FlightAware를 무료로 유지할 수 있습니다. Flightaware에서는 훌륭한 경험을 제공할 수 있도록 관련성있고 방해되지 않는 광고를 유지하기 위해 열심히 노력하고 있습니다. FlightAware에서 간단히 광고를 허용 하거나 프리미엄 계정을 고려해 보십시오..
종료