← Back to Squawk list

77

VIDEO: Watch dramatic engine failure on Thomas Cook Airbus A330

7년 전 제출됨

Yesterday was quite eventful for plane spotters at Manchester Airport in the UK. A routine morning of arrivals and departures was dramatically overshadowed by the engine failure of a Thomas Cook Airbus A330-200 during the afternoon. (www.youtube.com) 기타...

41 멤버 코멘트

Sort type: [Top] [Newest]

Torsten Hoff 7년 전 9

Full left rudder with virtually no delay. Quick reaction by the pilot or is that automatic?

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Report

mechlink 7년 전 1

Automatic yaw damper action.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report

THRUSTT 7년 전 -1

Most modern airplanes have a bias...

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report

THRUSTT 7년 전 -6

-1, so there are 2 dumbasses!!!

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report

THRUSTT 7년 전 2

6 now

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report

Michael Fuquay 7년 전 7

Hot Brakes!

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Report

cholubaz 7년 전 11

(Duplicate Squawk Submitted)

Airbus A330 right engine failure causes aborted take off

Thomas Cook flight 314 from Manchester to the Dominican Republic, operated on an Airbus A330-200 (registered G-OMYT) was proceeding well on its departure roll when it experienced a failure of its right engine.
The video shows exactly what is supposed to happen in these circumstances, for which flight crews train relentlessly.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=PS1YAX70edc

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Report

Daniel Baker 7년 전 11

Great alternative perspective.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report

joel wiley 7년 전 3

And ATC audio. 8 secs from flash to boom, 3 sec on main vidio
As the Controller ended, "Lovely"

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report

Andrew Skretvedt 7년 전 3

It's very cool in the alternate (head-on view) video to watch the rudder kick out and compensate for the sudden asymmetric thrust. Very little deviation from the centerline. I wonder, how might that look on an ice-covered runway? I'm guessing until you're slow enough, it's mostly "flown" with the flight control surfaces as opposed to "driven" with the friction from the tires. In the above side-view video, it seems there is a some momentary wheel lockup from both main-gear trucks. I suppose that's what max-autobrake gives you: system continually working to the edge of lockup, finding it with a little wheel lock, then backing off just-enough. Cool (or, HOT in this case).

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Report

AABABY 7년 전 1

I saw the wheels bouncing too. Wasn't sure of that as my monitor is old. Did look like at least 2 wheel hops on the left side though.
The whole deal turned out rather well considering the worst case scenario.
It's nice to see something work as designed.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report

sparkie624 7년 전 3

Good Abort. Glad it didn't wait another 10 seconds or so...

I see the 787 isn't the only one getting bad press when it is not their fault.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Report

gongchan shik 7년 전 2

"Routine morning of arrivals and departures"? I don't think the Antonov 225 is a regular sight at Manchester, darling.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Report

Dean Johnson 7년 전 2

Impressive and a good catch by video fellow.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Report

sparkie624 7년 전 3

From working the Professional Video Industry for a period of time.... that was more luck than skill.... But as in a good game of poker... I will take good luck anytime over skill.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report

WhiteKnight77 7년 전 2

Here is a different view of said engine failure.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sxHKu8XteHU

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Report

AABABY 7년 전 2

Something hit the fan. Watch for it at about 16 -18 seconds. A white streak going clockwise at the 10 O'Clock.
Bird?

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report

joel wiley 7년 전 1

It may have been a failure rather than an impact. I saw a flash as if a metal piece was bouncing around. Didn't see anything moving before that. OTOH camera was a loonng way off.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report

AABABY 7년 전 2

Joel: so you did see the event. You're right, it could be bird strike or parts failure. I guess a close look at the intake area will tell the story. Feathers or shards.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report

WhiteKnight77 7년 전 1

That white streak was the fireball that can be seen from the original video.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report

Bill Baird 7년 전 1

That must have been one tough bird. Part of jet engine certification is a proven ability to ingest huge amounts of ice at high power settings.

Fortunately the crew recognized the problem and rejected the takeoff in a very controlled and professional manner.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Report

Roy Shepard 7년 전 1

Quite an educational presentation.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Report

ynot ssor 7년 전 1

This A330-243 is equipped with Rolls-Royce RB211 Trent 772B-60 engines, according to registry.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Report

Edmundo Ribas 7년 전 1

Congratulations to the pilot aborted on time procedures

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Report

Pete Schecter 7년 전 1

nice/appropriate ARFF and crew response; well done.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Report

Don Mills 7년 전 1

As the comedians say, "Timing is everything". Three minutes later might not have been a happy ending.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Report

ויקטור.b יצחק 7년 전 1

scary

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Report

Michael Laue 7년 전 -5

can't see any dramatic stuff on the video.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Report

sparkie624 7년 전 2

Would have been nice to seen an in cockpit view... CVR may some interesting wordings as well.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report

Michelle Phillips 7년 전 1

me neither .. based on the caption on the article!!

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report

Marcus Pradel 7년 전 -6

aborted take-offs are business as usual. 1 out of every 2,000 flights does it for one reason or another every day. That is what you train for, or an engine failure in climbout..

I've had 1 give out before liftoff, it was over before I consciously noticed. Rudder comes out, both engines to idle or reverse & brakes to max, check co-pilot for stunned look. 3 seconds feel like 30!

And then you go grab a drink, job well done.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report

Tim Patton 7년 전 6

Marcus you must live in a different world, i flew heavy jets for 25 years and an aborted take off is definitely not business as usual.One of the most dangerous and difficult tasks you can perform . The guys at Thompson did a fantastic job

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report

Tim Patton 7년 전 5

Sorry Thomas Cook before any one else corrects me.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report

bentwing60 7년 전 2

I kinda suspect Marcus lives in the C 172 world, not that there is anything wrong with that. I strongly question his #'s for RTO's per operations. Show me the historical data upon which you base your claim. Boeing did a study on RTO's some years back and came to the conclusion that a go,in most circumstances, at or near V1, is by far the safer choice. A rejected takeoff around V1 is NOT bidness as usual. Having flown transport category jets for some 25 years, hats off to Tim. And after experiencing an RTO in a Lear 35, near V1 a few years back, due to two blown mains on the left side, I know we train for it, I know it is always a possibility, and I pay much more attention to BFL, but I don't want to do it again. And my guess is the Thomas Cook airplane was well below V1, and probably below 100 knts. based on the video time line, though it doesn't start at the takeoff roll. They did what you train for, and did it correctly. Hence, the positive outcome. Believe it or not, to a true professional, it ain't a matter of luck. Though I'll take some any time.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report

emmanuelaponte 7년 전 4

But just before liftoff wouldn't you be past v1?

Sounds like it was unsafe sir.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report

a320cap 7년 전 0

Looked like a compressor stall to me. If it was, the abort was ill-advised. Need more data.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Report

joel wiley 7년 전 1

Followup report would be very helpful.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report

joel wiley 7년 전 1

A couple followups. Aborted at 140 kts, engine being looked at, The AAIB have opened an investigation into the occurrence rated a serious incident. A330-200, registration G-OMYT

http://www.aeroinside.com/item/2716/thomas-cook-a332-at-manchester-on-jun-24th-2013-rejected-takeoff

http://avherald.com/h?article=46455b06&opt=0

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report

Eric da Silva 7년 전 -1

Thanks goodness the A330 didn't reach it V1 speed or else the pilot would be flying with one engine.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Report

C S 7년 전 -1

Thank god it didn't happen during rotation. That could've ended badly...

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Report

Eric da Silva 7년 전 -1

Thanks goodness the A330 didn't reach it V1 speed, or else the pilot would be flying with on one engine.Also I think the pilot handled the abort take off procedure amazingly.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Report

로그인

이 웹 사이트는 쿠키를 사용합니다. 이 웹 사이트를 사용하고 탐색함으로써 귀하는 이러한 쿠기 사용을 수락하는 것입니다.

종료

FlightAware 항공편 추적이 광고로 지원된다는 것을 알고 계셨습니까?

FlightAware.com의 광고를 허용하면 FlightAware를 무료로 유지할 수 있습니다. Flightaware에서는 훌륭한 경험을 제공할 수 있도록 관련성있고 방해되지 않는 광고를 유지하기 위해 열심히 노력하고 있습니다. FlightAware에서 간단히 광고를 허용 하거나 프리미엄 계정을 고려해 보십시오..

종료