← Back to Squawk list

Aeroméxico Durango-CDMX flight crashes shortly after takeoff

3년 전 제출됨

Aeroméxico Durango-CDMX flight crashes shortly after takeoff... (mexiconewsdaily.com) 기타...

msharic

42 멤버 코멘트

Sort type: [Top] [Newest]

Cade foster 3년 전 11

Weather conditions "were poor with heavy rain and hail"
IMHO that is far past poor.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Report

1BabyGirl 3년 전 4

Exactly right. No professional pilot in his/her right mind would attempt a takeoff under those conditions. I would assume and hope that flight crew will be looking for another line of work.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report

Angelo Rodriguez 3년 전 4

Certainly might have been a microburst but no pilot I know (myself included) would have attempted a departure in those conditions. Footage just after shows good conditions. Delayed departure by 5 minutes and likely different outcome.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Report

Steve Jones 3년 전 3

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/aerom-xico-plane-crash-caught-video-filmed-passenger-n896521

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Report

Tom Zaidman 3년 전 3

Why,why for Heavens sake do pilots continuously take of or land in bad weather. Most probably not to arrive late and be"punished"by their superiors. Surely on time records help promotion but they are dangerous. Captain van Zanten rushed his KLM takeoff not be late and the result over 500 passengers killed on a runway in fog when two 747 crashed.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Report

AWAAlum 3년 전 1

Aww c'mon, we all know no one's superior to a pilot.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report

joel wiley 3년 전 1

It says right in the title
https://www.amazon.com/GOD-MY-PILOT-Scribner-1943/dp/B00BH1ND0U/ref=pd_lpo_sbs_14_img_0/133-4327369-0831429?_encoding=UTF8&psc=1&refRID=GDWJYZB9B80Q2B5J8HKN

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report

James Simms 3년 전 0

In those conditions, God is probably the reason everyone survived the crash

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report

Rob Ainscough 3년 전 2

With reported hail and the instability that brings, I agree that would have been a definite NO GO scenario. Glad everyone got out alive and a testament to how well that aircraft is designed to make that a survivable situation. Most likely this will go down a pilot error.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Report

AWAAlum 3년 전 2

I wonder, if the weather was so severe, why would they be cleared for take-off?

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Report

Tony Smith 3년 전 1

It's ultimately the PIC's decision. The tower can give reported weather conditions but they make the choice. Recall another accident in similar conditions, USAir 1016. Another USAir flight declined takeoff clearance while the accident plane tried to land in the microburst. One good decision, one bad one.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report

Phil Knox 3년 전 1

Doesn't the "Company" have a final say as to go or no go? They ultimately have parameters regarding safe procedures!

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report

joel wiley 3년 전 3

The PIC has final say as to go/no go. Company has final say on remain employed/"You're Fired".

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report

bentwing60 3년 전 1

You pretty much hit the nail on the head Joel, and I'm not sure why this is here at a month down the road. The tower personnel have no say in it unless the field is closed to operations due to weather in this case or whatever in others. Fortune smiles on some.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report

Marco Antonio Granados 3년 전 1

Just asking... Who decides the take off authorization? ATC or pilot? Once in a MXA CYUL-MMMX on Dec 25 1997, 7:00 AM, Santa was deicing the plane, ATC give us clearance, after us a Delta MD, also had clearance... and then airport closed by the next 15 days... :-)

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report

ian mcdonell 3년 전 1

Please explain:

"One report said the pilot attempted but failed to abort the takeoff."

I would like to know how to attempt to abort and take off and fail to do it?

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Report

Shenghao Han 3년 전 1

Passed V1 I assume

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report

John D 3년 전 -3

I saw one report that said it went down 10 miles from the airport.
That was a pretty new plane, how could they not know weather conditions were so poor that you'd not want to fly in it?

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report

bartmiller 3년 전 4

The news photos showed the wreckage just off the departure end of the runway.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report

Marco Antonio Granados 3년 전 1

https://www.msn.com/es-mx/noticias/mexico/confirman-que-no-hay-fallecidos-por-desplome-de-avi%c3%b3n-en-durango/ar-BBLkHxs?li=AAggxAT

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Report

dondtus 3년 전 1

https://flightaware.com/live/flight/SLI2431/history/20180731/2019Z/MMDO/MMMX

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Report

gerardo godoy 3년 전 1

Apparently the pilot is in bad shape. I think they should never have taken off in that weather.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Report

bbabis 3년 전 1

The plane came down 10 km from the airport. It was under control or there would have been many fatalities. Put these together and there must have been a power loss. Water, hail, or other ingestion. Poor decisions were made for sure but all surviving is good news.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Report

Phil Knox 3년 전 4

Or...a microburst!

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report

Mike Boote 3년 전 3

I heard on the news today it was likely a microburst.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report

matt jensen 3년 전 1

bingo

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report

chalet 3년 전 1

My first thought was a microburst but if so the first reaction was the plane lifting off due to a substatial increase in headwind but it never did.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report

Phil Knox 3년 전 3

Sure...but a microburst is quickly descending air which, when it hits the ground (or an airplane) fans out in all directions! Wgat at first is a hesdwind giving lift quickly becomes a tailwind driving you into the ground!

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report

John D 3년 전 3

I watched a video and it seems it barely got off the ground let along 10k. Not disputing you, just seems like it didn't get very far.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report

bbabis 3년 전 2

Yes John, that would be a soccer goal type slide. The linked story to this squawk had the 10k statement. It has since been corrected.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report

James Simms 3년 전 1

Like the Geico Insurance soccer slide ad

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report

Torsten Hoff 3년 전 3

The plane came to rest about three hundred yards past the end of the runway at Guadalupe Victoria International Airport.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report

bbabis 3년 전 0

Thanks. It’s nice to get the right facts which sadly the news rearly gets right. I change my guess to windshear and poor pilot performance.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report

Phil Knox 3년 전 4

Yup...windshear/microburst!

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report

william baker 3년 전 1

No deaths have been reported to any of the passengers or crew. The plane was a embraer 190 aircraft. Hope for a safe and fast recovery for all on board.

https://www.cnn.com/2018/07/31/americas/aeromexico-plane-durango/index.html

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Report

Marco Antonio Granados 3년 전 1

PIC had a cervical surgery, fortunately, spinal cord was intact, and in the recovery room is reported that sensivity was returning to his legs. Prior to the surgery he reported first to his mom, then he asked for status of his PAX and crew, an if is there any deceased. Then he was moved to the surgery room...

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report

joel wiley 3년 전 1

Thanks be to those tingling toes. Saw many times in Neuro ICU them waiting in vain.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report

Mike Boote 3년 전 1

The results speak very highly of the crew and aircraft

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Report

Torsten Hoff 3년 전 5

Based on video of the weather conditions in the area at the time of the accident, they never should have taken off.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report

joel wiley 3년 전 1

Does the area have doppler radar capable of detecting microbursts and an ability to publish warnings?

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report

Jerry Bix 3년 전 1

I could be wrong but based on the video it looks like the pilot failed to deploy the flaps.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Report

Phil Knox 3년 전 2

Usually on takeoffs...slats and flaps are set to a minimal setting!

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report

FlightAware.com의 광고를 허용하면 FlightAware를 무료로 유지할 수 있습니다. Flightaware에서는 훌륭한 경험을 제공할 수 있도록 관련성있고 방해되지 않는 광고를 유지하기 위해 열심히 노력하고 있습니다. FlightAware에서 간단히 광고를 허용 하거나 프리미엄 계정을 고려해 보십시오..

종료

Aeroméxico Durango-CDMX flight crashes shortly after takeoff

42 멤버 코멘트

Sort type: [Top] [Newest]

로그인