이 웹 사이트는 쿠키를 사용합니다. 이 웹 사이트를 사용하고 탐색함으로써 귀하는 이러한 쿠기 사용을 수락하는 것입니다.
종료
FlightAware 항공편 추적이 광고로 지원된다는 것을 알고 계셨습니까?
FlightAware.com의 광고를 허용하면 FlightAware를 무료로 유지할 수 있습니다. Flightaware에서는 훌륭한 경험을 제공할 수 있도록 관련성있고 방해되지 않는 광고를 유지하기 위해 열심히 노력하고 있습니다. FlightAware에서 간단히 광고를 허용 하거나 프리미엄 계정을 고려해 보십시오..
종료
Back to Squawk list
  • 46

SkyLease Cargo Boeing 747-400F Runs Off Runway in Halifax, Sustained Damage

제출됨
 
A SkyLease Cargo Boeing 747-400F cargo plane ran off Halifax Airport's Runway 14. The plane was on flight GG4854 from Chicago-O'Hare, coming to a full stop and reporting considerable damage. No injuries have been registered. (airwaysmag.com) 기타...

Sort type: [Top] [Newest]


gruntusmc
Well, yes. I would say it sustained damage. Hell, it destroyed the cotton picking airplane dummy!
Jpuck
So glad it came to a FULL STOP and didn't continue off airport property and taxi into downtown Halifax.....Yes it could have been much worse but really, who wrote this AND proofread it??????
anobscurereference
Wikipedia article on Skylease says that as of December 2017 this A/C was leased from Aercap and the only B747 operated by Skylease. Aircraft can be replaced -- just glad no one was seriously injured.
bsampson
Food for thought.
When it comes to aircraft, assuming anything is deadly....
nasdisco
Chris B 1
https://twitter.com/TomPodolec/status/1060158430051254272
MultiComm
Not sure why Atlas was mentioned in this article. Maybe I am mistaken but I don’t see their name on the registry records at all:

https://www.airfleets.net/ficheapp/plane-b747-28026.htm
Quidnon
Quidnon 1
Atlas owns the aircraft and it was dry-leased to Skylease, not that the article makes that clear.
MultiComm
Wouldn’t the registration data indicate the current owner?
avsgman
a bit of an update all crew taken to hospital
tomasz2013
not sure what the weather was like but i read that the 747 landed MT to pick up a load of seafood then on to Japan. My question is even if MT, unless winds were an issue why did it land on the shorter runway 14?
MultiComm
This article doesn’t give a whole lot of info but the winds were most certainly NOT favoring this runway ... was anywhere from 5-8 knot tailwind component, wet runway, low ceilings and mist. I’ll leave my opinions off this post but you can guess what they might be.
MichaelBaser
Why is the landing gear retracted?
bsampson
In this case the gear is not retracted, it collapsed
khaiduk
Wow - is that a write off?
wwharris
Hard to say for sure from the angle of the photo with the article, but it looks like the top line of fuselage has a discontinuity in it between the wings and the empennage.
TorstenHoff
I suspect so. The aircraft is 22 years old and the damage to the fuselage and engines is extensive. They'll probably strip some parts and scrap the rest.
shenghaohan
Yes that poor thing will never fly again... But you bet some of her parts will.
alan75035
That'll buff right out.
HNL25
I can’t imagine how it would not be written off.
MultiComm
The inboard engines were ripped off and the outboards severely damaged. Sitting on its belly with several skin wrinkles to top it off.
wireguy
A reliable source told that they salvaged the undercarriage and the rest is to be shredded over the next couple days. Hard to imagine a 747 going through a shredder !
MultiComm
They just take a claw attached to a big Caterpillar and start taking bites out of it. There are videos on YouTube ...
usrepeaters
Does anyone know where this plane was headed? Hope it was not an insurance job.
MultiComm
I just assumed Halifax was the destination?
tomasz2013
was picking up seafood then on to Japan

로그인

계정을 가지고 계십니까? 사용자 정의된 기능, 비행 경보 및 더 많은 정보를 위해 지금(무료) 등록하세요!