Back to Squawk list
  • 14

New York Times: Claims of shoddy production draw scrutiny to a second Boeing Jet

제출됨
 
From the New York Times: Workers at a 787 Dreamliner plant in South Carolina have complained of defective manufacturing, debris left on planes and pressure to not report violations. (worldairlinenews.com) 기타...

Sort type: [Top] [Newest]


bdjam
It's a shame that these types of issues are coming to the forefront of a respected and innovative company like Boeing. It seems that the practices that caused issues around the 787 - including the non-union and under trained shop in South Carolina - have spilled over to the 737 MAX. Hopefully the 777-9 has been spared some of these same signs of degrading quality.

Normally competition is good for consumers and product quality. Seems in this case, Boeing has been more concerned with keeping their profits up by racing against Airbus than they have delivering the type of product they've been known for. One has to wonder what happens when planes being produced in Asia start coming on line when Boeing finds the market even more difficult to navigate.
watkinssusan
I saw an interview with a man (now retired)who was a "whistleblower" on the problems with manufacturing the boeing 787 Dreamliner..he said he personally witnessed people leaving shards of metal inside engine parts etcetera, rather than cleaning up the debris left,in order to speed production of the 787's..he had some pictures he had taken to back up his allegations..American airlines says they will still keep their orders for more of that particular aircraft..boeing is a very old company, and until recently,had the respect of major airlines,passengers and pilots.let us hope they can correct all of their really serious issues and get their reputation back..
Rws1943
As former aircrew with over 16,000 flying hours. It's time to re-evaluate the entire process of training the people who build, and people who fly today's aircraft. My first instructor told me never to forget "remember your training, follow the checklists, but most importantly "FLY THE BLOODY PLANE!!"

Too much reliance on these automated systems and minimum training hours for trainee pilots makes for bad cockpit management and the possibility of errors being missed, as well as not having the traditional "Feel" for flying a plane.

I talk to a lot of current Captains and First Officers who say they are only given minimal training, and the airlines are pushing them harder than ever before to ignore such things as weather hazards and non essential failure items, in order to make schedules and make more $.

We all need to stop and re-consider the entire structure of the global airline business and ATC shortages, as well as considering the implications for passengers with lack of good service and an attitude of arrogance towards the travelling public.
Cansojr
Cansojr 5
These procedures basically the law for pilots is AVIATE, NAVIGATE COMMUNICATE.
ljcotnoir
Boeing built a plant in South Carolina for cheap, non-union labor. They are getting what they are paying for.
KobeHunte
Boeing dropped like a rock in the last couple months.. comon Boeing!
greasemonkey
Yes Boeing,,, get that monkey off your back, it's biting you. << does this make sense??
garritt
garritt 2
if a corporation desires quality....why would they build in S. Carolina ?
RAYGIB
I don't want to replace the 'ain't' on my Boeing hat with 'is' !! Now the 78, after the 73....
bcfd29
This is very troubling, and based on reports of debris in air force deliveries published elsewhere, this problem seems to be systemic here. How did we so badly lose our way as a quality manufacturing leader in this country? This has nothing to do with a union vs non-union shp, but the values intrinsic to the organization (or lack there of). Back to basics!
ljcotnoir
While the issue may not be one of union vs non-union, it does appear to be one of corporate responsibility vs profit-above-all. The same motives that drove Boeing to an anti-union state are behind the decline in quality.
canuck44
canuck44 -2
This is basically a pro-union hit piece based on anecdote. They fail to mention the Air Force rejecting the tankers for tools and debris left in the "finished" product manufactured by the union work force.

I still cannot understand why Boeing moved to Chicago from Seattle.
VivPike
Viv Pike 8
canuck44 - Did you read the full report? Here is a sample for you. "The issue has cost Boeing at other plants. In March, the Air Force halted deliveries of the KC-46 tanker, built in Everett, Wash., after finding a wrench, bolts and trash inside new planes.

“To say it bluntly, this is unacceptable,” Will Roper, an assistant secretary of the Air Force, told a congressional subcommittee in March. “Our flight lines are spotless. Our depots are spotless, because debris translates into a safety issue.”
s2v8377
s2v8377 7
This not a union issue. Why are you blaming the union? This is a Boeing problem and they have to fix it.
yr2012
They wanted to be closer to UAL which at the time was the main purchaser of their jets. WA state has no corp or personal income tax. IL has both - the corp tax is 9.5% and individual is 3.75%. The state and city gave out huge tax breaks.
williambaker08
Don’t forget United was owned by Boeing when it was first started.
canuck44
canuck44 2
Houston and Dallas were both competing for that business and pretty much served the same destinations. Houston served both Continental ans Southwest, Dallas American and Southwest.
Cansojr
Cansojr -3
Could it be because there may be a different work ethic in the southern United States. You will find a different ethic in every demographic cohort.
greasemonkey
Cansoir,,,possibility there.. I've worked in different states and noticed the work ethics, but just did my job,, no ratting out or whistle-blowing,, it probably wouldn't change the attitudes of some employees.
Cansojr
Cansojr 1
Thank you for explaining that for me, thanks.

로그인

계정을 가지고 계십니까? 사용자 정의된 기능, 비행 경보 및 더 많은 정보를 위해 지금(무료) 등록하세요!
이 웹 사이트는 쿠키를 사용합니다. 이 웹 사이트를 사용하고 탐색함으로써 귀하는 이러한 쿠기 사용을 수락하는 것입니다.
종료
FlightAware 항공편 추적이 광고로 지원된다는 것을 알고 계셨습니까?
FlightAware.com의 광고를 허용하면 FlightAware를 무료로 유지할 수 있습니다. Flightaware에서는 훌륭한 경험을 제공할 수 있도록 관련성있고 방해되지 않는 광고를 유지하기 위해 열심히 노력하고 있습니다. FlightAware에서 간단히 광고를 허용 하거나 프리미엄 계정을 고려해 보십시오..
종료