Five years ago, the flight vanished into the Indian Ocean. Officials on land know more about why than they dare to say. Squawk poster note (frank1711) I know there have been many articles & posts about MH370 but this Atlantic article covers it all & covers the problems with the Malaysian government. (www.theatlantic.com) 기타...
The Guy took off and went Dark... It is proven he had a flight simulator setup with the exact scenario.... In my opinion, it could not have been anything else.
That article seems to be a fair recounting of what is known and a measured commentary on the Malaysian government. However, much of it is rather speculative. The air defense radar tracks certainly suggest a deliberate departure from the flight plan, once the plane was on a course over the Indian Ocean everything except the satellite data is pure speculation. Clearly someone diverted the flight but intent of that person is just a guess. It is entirely possible, for example, that the plane was hijacked but that everyone on the flight deck perished in an altercation and plane continued on auto pilot until it ran out of fuel. I am very dubious of the claim that satellite Doppler indicated acceleration beyond what would be the result of fuel exhaustion at altitude.
This was a well written article which states flat out that the government agencies in Malaysia covered things up and hindered any timely investigation of the incident. There is some indication that the pilot was involved, but because of Malaysian interference, we'll never know of sure.
I love this article, but it's worth pointing out that this is NOT a consensus opinion. A fire in the batteries known to be in the cargo hold can also explain pretty much everything that happened.
Yeah.... Seeing how he purposely flew about 90 degrees off course with all his reporting equipment blacked out and dark... Not to mention they found a flight sim setup to do just that... No other proof needed.
When all else fails always blame it on pilot error, or the pilot, even when there is no substantial proof but the public has to make it simplistic by blaming the human factor.
For me, I think I will wait till it's found, if ever, and let the crash investigators discover what caused the fatal crash.
I'm reminded of an Airbus crash not so many years ago in which all investigators were geared towards the mindset of Pilot error. Finally, have searched for months the plane was discovered....the final report icing in the stall veins due to some ground idiot who had power washed them trying to get overspray paint off. Thank God the plane was discovered with a dead crew / test crew of it would have been written off as pilot error.
It was not pilot error... It was Pilot Intentional... He did what he intended to do and practiced doing it... It did so well and without error... He did not want to be found, and he hasn't been....
This one: The primary cause of the accident was that the crew attempted an improvised test of the AOA warning system, not knowing that it was not functioning properly due to the inoperative sensors. They also disregarded the proper speed limits for the tests they were performing, resulting in a stall.
The aircraft's computers received conflicting information from the three angle of attack sensors. The aircraft computer system’s programming logic had been designed to reject one sensor value if it deviated significantly from the other two sensor values. In this specific case, this programming logic led to the rejection of the correct value from the one operative angle of attack sensor, and to the acceptance of the two consistent, but wrong, values from the two inoperative angle of attack sensors. This resulted in the system's stall protection functions responding incorrectly to the stall, making the situation worse, instead of better. In addition, the pilots also failed to recover from an aerodynamic stall in a manual mode in which the stabilizer had to be set to an up position to trim the aircraft. But only the stick was applied forward, the aircraft did not trim itself because it was switched to full manual mode. Seconds later the plane crashed into the sea. See any similarity between Max and Bus accidents.....one high and one low speed but both had elevator and stabilizer at settings that were opposite to each other, and only a jackass does a dirty stall series at 3,000’!
That the captain was responsible is speculative. However, there is no question that the diversion was deliberate. I am inclined to think that whoever was flying the plane intended to take it somewhere. If their goal was suicide, why take six hours to do it?
I have to agree. All scenarios are a priori very unlikely, and there's very little evidence to promote one very unlikely scenario over another. Is pilot suicide-murder really more likely than, e.g. a depressurization problem like Helios Flight 522? I don't think so.
Did you bother to read the whole article? We may not know definitively what the cause was but you can't say that all scenarios are equally likely. Accidental depressurization does not explain the flight path or that the communication system was turned off.
What about explosive de-compression? Cause, cockpit windshield, specifically the front windshield directly in front of the pilot. Something I have wondered about since the first day.
이 웹 사이트는 쿠키를 사용합니다. 이 웹 사이트를 사용하고 탐색함으로써 귀하는 이러한 쿠기 사용을 수락하는 것입니다.
종료
FlightAware 항공편 추적이 광고로 지원된다는 것을 알고 계셨습니까?
FlightAware.com의 광고를 허용하면 FlightAware를 무료로 유지할 수 있습니다. Flightaware에서는 훌륭한 경험을 제공할 수 있도록 관련성있고 방해되지 않는 광고를 유지하기 위해 열심히 노력하고 있습니다. FlightAware에서 간단히 광고를 허용 하거나 프리미엄 계정을 고려해 보십시오..
"We think the pilot did it, but we'll probably never be sure."