Back to Squawk list
  • 103

Crossing traffic 1000 feet below as seen from a 747. This was over the east coast of Russia.

제출됨
 
787 dreamliner contrail. Crossing traffic 1000 feet below as seen from a 747. This was over the east coast of Russia. (www.youtube.com) 기타...

Sort type: [Top] [Newest]


mk882004
When you hear "caution wake turbulence" this is what should run across your mind, beautiful to look at, not beautiful to fly through!
richardorgill
Beautiful and yet no matter how many times I try and explain vapor trails I still have three employees who believe the Gvt is spraying us.
royhunte92
Roy Hunte 13
Are they flat earther too? Lol.
MrTommy
MrTommy 3
Ahh, the old Art Bell chemtrail thingie . . .

[This comment has been downvoted. Show anyway.]

darjr26
darjr26 13
As long as you wear your aluminum hat you’ll be fine.
JMARTINSON
JMARTINSON 2
Technically it's not a hat, it's a colander.
Quirkyfrog
It's impossible to ban contrails. That would be like banning your breath in the winter.

"a trail of condensed water from an aircraft or rocket at high altitude, seen as a white streak against the sky."

I think the 'chemtrail' meme was started to allow idiots to self-identify by believing that lie. I have been surprised at the people that have been suckered into it too. Your car exhaust does the same thing too. It's CONDENSATION! Water vapor...
WhiteKnight77
The "chemtrail' phenomenon has been around since jet airliners became a thing. I ask those who think such about why life is still alive since contrails have been around since the 1940, as seen by high flying bombers over Europe. Surely after 70+ years we have sprayed enough chemicals to kill us all?
Quirkyfrog
How contrails are formed: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nfdCnPZGwt0
pr0ject
El Kabong 11
You guys realize I was being sarcastic, right? There's been press blaming airliners for global warming lately which is like saying pencils cause bad grades.
rbdancer
But Poe's Law requires you to add the /s sarcasm tag. There are plenty of folks out there who would type what you did but mean it seriously.
Quirkyfrog
I did after I posted the last time. Yeah, I had someone who was so convinced that planes were 'spraying mind control chemicals' that they wrote letters almost weekly to their congresspeople urging them to completely kill the airline industry.
Quirkyfrog
Seriously... We had a 'heated discussion' on chemtrails. I wanted to run away... https://gph.is/1nuYwhL
jbsimms
AOC & Company
jbsimms
YAWN......

[This comment has been downvoted. Show anyway.]

joelwiley
Did you write that on your phone and used 'dem' for 'them'? If you did, you saved one whole entire keystroke. /s
withersfamily
That’s Dem as in Democrat
btweston
btweston 7
You aren’t very smart. Thanks for clearing that up.
joelwiley
Oh, I see. In contrast to the Republican snowflakes
666adt
Yes, in contrast, because there are virtually no Republican snowflakes. Who're the ones who created safe spaces and "triggers" and preferred pronouns and 57 genders, etc.? The Left. The Left are snowflakes.
rbdancer
How about the one who complains about being treated "unfairly, worse than anyone in history"? Kinda melty.
JMARTINSON
JMARTINSON 0
Worse than Garfield? That's saying something.
joelwiley
joel wiley 4
According to the OED's draft 2018 addition:
snowflake, n
originally and chiefly U.S. (usually derogatory and potentially offensive). Originally: a person, esp. a child, regarded as having a unique personality and potential. Later: a person mockingly characterized as overly sensitive or easily offended, esp. one said to consider himself or herself entitled to special treatment or consideration.

While I understand how you might characterize certain individuals on the liberal side of the political spectrum, it is incorrect to attribute the designation to all individuals who are not of non-liberal persuasion.

There are certain individuals carrying a Republican registration that aptly fit that category. I could, but decline to name names.

Enough troll-feeding, I'll stop now.
withersfamily
I just like to pick on Democrats. 😁
joelwiley
Everyone needs a hobby ;-)
withersfamily
Not really a hobby, just something to do once or twice a year
LuciusGravely
The scary one is when the oncoming jet is 1000' above you, on the same airway, and coming at you. Now that looks scary!
ElliotCannon
Lots of comments about contrails/chemtrails. What impressed me is how close the two aircraft were. I remember flying 1000 ft. over an ANA airplane just before joining the North Pacific tracks. This was just after they started RVSM. I remember commenting to my co-pilot, "yikes, that is really close".LOL
kenoraeagle
Great video. I always watch for these when travelling. Sure does freak some novice passengers out though.
Loub747
Lou Boyer 3
I took this video. You might really like this one....

https://youtu.be/fJpzjnV_VPo
wbnethery3
Nice one, too... you might provide a little more context when you share links because that looked like click-bait. If I wasn't working behind one of the most secure firewalls in the free world, I probably wouldn't have clicked on it.
WhiteKnight77
How does a link that states YouTube (youtu.be) look like click bait?
WhiteKnight77
That is an awesome video. Great find.
Loub747
Lou Boyer 3
Thanks, I took the video.
tenxes
tenxes 3
Spectacular. Rapidly closing on a steady bearing = intercept. Vertical separation is a good thing.
sgbelverta
I think Steven Spielberg or Michael Bay could use that video in a movie. I bet on a large screen it would be scary.
glhanson
Now you don't see that everyday!
dardav
dardav 2
take a pail of water, stand outside at -45C, toss it is the air. Instant condensation!!!!
Bobqat
Pretty sure that pail of water was already 'condensed'... ;^}
jbsimms
Was TDY in Belgium during the Summer of ‘96. Wasn’t uncommon to go outside in the evening & just wee the sky crisscrossed by contrails
jackhendricks94
"its just Snoop doggs private plane"
Quirkyfrog
That looks frightening!
PSUAth
on a 2+ year old video?
rbdancer
I didn't see it two years ago, so I was grateful to have the chance today.
Loub747
Lou Boyer 1
Thanks, I took this video.
aatonini
the crossing traffic between the dreamliner and the 747 was not a bit too close for comfort? It happened on the russian coastline? Well.......it is another story
paulgilpin1953
all that air up there. and they HAVE to fly within 1K feet of each other.
joelwiley
joel wiley 1
All that space in the Western States and the have to stay in the traffic lanes of the Interstates.

로그인

계정을 가지고 계십니까? 사용자 정의된 기능, 비행 경보 및 더 많은 정보를 위해 지금(무료) 등록하세요!
이 웹 사이트는 쿠키를 사용합니다. 이 웹 사이트를 사용하고 탐색함으로써 귀하는 이러한 쿠기 사용을 수락하는 것입니다.
종료
FlightAware 항공편 추적이 광고로 지원된다는 것을 알고 계셨습니까?
FlightAware.com의 광고를 허용하면 FlightAware를 무료로 유지할 수 있습니다. Flightaware에서는 훌륭한 경험을 제공할 수 있도록 관련성있고 방해되지 않는 광고를 유지하기 위해 열심히 노력하고 있습니다. FlightAware에서 간단히 광고를 허용 하거나 프리미엄 계정을 고려해 보십시오..
종료