Back to Squawk list
  • 34

VIDEO: FedEx plane makes emergency landing at LAX; 1 pilot injured

제출됨
 
Video captured a FedEx plane making an emergency landing at Los Angeles International Airport Wednesday morning after a mechanical issue. (abc7.com) 기타...

Sort type: [Top] [Newest]


juancarlos776
Great job by the crew, they got that plane stopped right on the center line!
djames225
djames225 21
Youtube video from just before touchdown
Guys did a great job keeping it off that left engine cowl long as they could...not so good a job coming out the emergency hatch. Hope the captain or FO is ok.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tyVKN_q34tM
sparkie624
Much better video... Crew did a great job... Now the Mechanics have some touch up work to do on that cowling once they get the gear down...

The 767 gear is incredibly reliable.... Will be interesting to see what caused this incident.
bzbbzb
It'll buff right out......
randomnumber
Speed tape and GO!
bzbbzb
Don't forget the Bondo!
sparkie624
While you are add it... Don't forget the Super Glue... It holds anything!
djames225
Gorilla Glue is better
williambaker08
I have some fingernail polish for the paint lol
21voyageur
William , , , , you worry me!
williambaker08
I worry myself sometimes too.
21voyageur
great reply! ;-{)
frewrednav
In all of the fixing items listed I can't believe Duck Tape hasn't been mentioned
williambaker08
Speed take and duck tape are almost the same and that was mentioned
HarrisonV
Incredible job by the crew. Glad they are doing well.
kevinkeswick
Link to ATC audio recording >>> https://forums.liveatc.net/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=15960.0;attach=10736

Listen to these cool and collected pros in action!
lettini
AMAZING!!
sparkie624
Thanks for Sharing
HarrisonV
Complete professionals. thanks for this.
WhiteKnight77
Very good job by the pilots keeping it between the lines and not off in the dirt.
kevinkeswick
Great job by the pilots. That is what true professionalism looks like. I bet both pilots were calm and cool as a cucumber during the landing, just another day "at the office"
jbermo
jbermo 1
. . and the FO even had time to test his escape rope.
ADXbear
ADXbear 8
Good job guys..
captrags80
Just reached out to a friend who flies the 767 for FexEx concerning the pilots egress from the aircraft. Here is his response:

On our 67’s we DO NOT have a slide. Primary egress is an “emergency escape reel” out the left side main cabin door, so picture a zip line that you hold onto. As a person decends it is supposed to reduce the decent rate commensurate with the body weight. Also of note, we have only one main cabin door and that’s the left side only.

My guess, and my guess only is because the damage was to the left wing and engine they probably decided to egress away from the compromised area.

Me personally I would’ve probably taken a look out the main cabin door before deciding to go out the window. I guarantee there was DG (dangerous goods on board) but that has no bearing on whether you go out the MCD or the windows. As an FO, in an EVAC I have to bring the “pouch” that contains the DG contents loaded positions.
ADAvViation
and this is why I love this forum.....Nice
jbermo
jbermo 6
An old B-747 emergency escape reel training video, but the principle remains the same.

https://video.search.yahoo.com/search/video?fr=yfp-t&p=escape+reels#id=1&vid=4e474f42681dfeec045926cefec78ea2&action=click
WhiteKnight77
That works like the decelarator that stuntmen use for falls.

https://farm1.static.flickr.com/27/97256566_250502559f.jpg
djames225
My understanding, after contacting some 76F crew, no purpose built 76F have a slide. As you mentioned, only 1 main cabin crew door. Primary emergency exit is the emergency escape "hatch" or cabin door swing arm "escape reels".
And your guess, after they watched videos, is probably close. If it was right side, then more than likely they would have used the swing arm, unless there was dangerous goods aboard. That does have a bearing on whether or not to use the mcd, as some of those goods may have been damaged upon landing and could now emit a gas.
dardav
dardav 5
definitely will leave a mark, and oh yes the pilots didn't decide to rest it on the left engine, apparently they are already in place.
Wmfisher58
I thought so. Great job to the pilots! No surprise the egress is dangerous no matter how it's done.
craigbell1941
Lucky it was a cargo and not a passenger livery
PKVol
Looking at the available videos, based on the smoothness of the landing, I'm guessing any Pax there would have been wouldn't have been jostled much, if at all. The noise of the cowl scrapping and a slight listing would have been the only difference from a regular landing.
djames225
Seems like VAS Aviation got the audio of the declaration and procedures

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8EyUmeeu7B8

Cool, calm and collected, by all.

ronbaird1942
Scary....One of my friends was pilot #7 for Fedex. Paid for fuel with her credit card. These guys and gals are GREAT!!!!!!!
geharper
The media mask on full display.
flshawkzak
The narrative must go on.
Bobqat
Appears to me that the No. 1 engine was still running(?) - sparks blown backwards (compared to fixed runway lighting) especially as the a/c slowed. Would the crew attempt to use engine thrust to counter friction pulling bird to the left? If so, it worked well - skilled pihot!
ADAvViation
I am confused. Why not blow the slide? Where they stuck in the cockpit? and if no slides (and that does not make sense) why did the stairs truck pull up to the cockpit window? The pilot that tried evac via the rope and the other that climbed out of the window could have seriously been injured. As a side note, American Airlines was in the process of surplusing our 757/767 Aircraft jacks and we offered a jack to lend a hand in the removal of the aircraft
captrags80
One has to wonder if company procedures dictate NOT going into the cabin after a situation like this due to having HazMat on board and the possible breach of those containers. I would think there is some sort of Hazmat on every cargo flight.
666adt
Michael Ragsdale answered that question, above. FedEx 767s don't *have* slides.
yatesd
yatesd 0
Slides cost money and the situation didn’t merit deployment in the eyes of the crew.
ADAvViation
so more cost effective to shatter your ankle? or potentially die from 20ft?
Slides do not cost that much. We have crews that inspect and repack.
Did not merit deployment? You think the flight crew was thinking about saving costs when they climbed out? I cannot agree with you one bit
666adt
FedEx 767s don't *have* slides.
yatesd
yatesd 1
You would have to ask them. I wasn’t the PIC.
ADAvViation
it seems you were the PIC you wrote "the situation didn’t merit deployment in the eyes of the crew"

Guess you forgot to say "maybe"? But great landing skills and I hope the pilot is ok.
Wmfisher58
Notice the nose wheel settled off the ground... Maybe that made the drop much higher than expected. Also, being at night (can't see much) and possible wing fire... I'd want to get outta there ASAP as well. Do cargo MODs even include any slides?
sparkie624
The reason the nose gear is off the ground is because the left engine was supporting that entire wing/side of A/C. The engine is way far forward of the center of gravity... It would be natural for the Nose Gear to come off the ground in that situation.
dave90650
I hope the landing Gear failure doesnt lead to another safety matter for Boeing. Boeing already has a lot on the plate with the 737 MAX
sparkie624
I doubt it will.... The Max was a new design... this gear has been around for a Very Very long time.
tnbriggs
And this is one of the new ones FedEx just bought. N158FE, new in 2018. Screwy how the old ones, 25 years+ are still doing fine and this occurs to a new one. Maybe one of those wrenches left laying around./s
ravanviman
Indeed, is there a way to find out if this one was in the same run that the Air Force rejected/complained about?
mltnb
Hey, what are you suggesting, a mechanic to blame ? , Shame . leave the investigation To the professionals and speculation to the bar
fa4gar
Terry Briggs was being sarcastic. See the "/s" at the end of his post?
mltnb
Oh that’s alright then !”/s”
djames225
She is N146FE, but I agree with your "old analogy..146 is only a little over 3 years old.
wwharris
Looks more like N146FE. https://flightaware.com/live/flight/N146FE/history/20200819/1101Z
PKVol
Interesting flight plan for N146FE, Memphis (MEM) to Boston (BOS), then to Newark (EWR) before going on to Los Angeles (LAX) in a little over 12 hours.

Not sure what that 4:01 to 4:48 "First seen near Santa Monica" before landing at LAX again.

https://flightaware.com/live/flight/N146FE/history/20200819/0531Z/KEWR/KLAX

로그인

계정을 가지고 계십니까? 사용자 정의된 기능, 비행 경보 및 더 많은 정보를 위해 지금(무료) 등록하세요!
FlightAware 항공편 추적이 광고로 지원된다는 것을 알고 계셨습니까?
FlightAware.com의 광고를 허용하면 FlightAware를 무료로 유지할 수 있습니다. Flightaware에서는 훌륭한 경험을 제공할 수 있도록 관련성있고 방해되지 않는 광고를 유지하기 위해 열심히 노력하고 있습니다. FlightAware에서 간단히 광고를 허용 하거나 프리미엄 계정을 고려해 보십시오..
종료