THERMAL (CBSLA) — A military transport plane made an emergency landing Tuesday in Thermal after clipping a fighter jet midair. (CBSLA) According to Marine Corps Air Station Yuma, it was reported at about 4 p.m. that an F-35B made contact with a KC-130J during an air-to-air refueling evolution, resulting in the crash of the fighter jet in Imperial County. (losangeles.cbslocal.com) 기타...
Listening to ATC it sounds like the F-35 hit the right wing and disabled the #3 & #4 engines. Leaking fuel and with a potential fire, the -130 crew did a great job with a wounded beast.
I have ridden in one a couple of times, but don't know jack about them. I don't know if you can open the side doors in flight, but someone below said you drop the cargo ramp and run out the back. Sounds good to me. So my question is how did it land. Was it on an automatic landing system of some sort? Looks like it came in with minimal damage, but looks can sometimes be deceiving.
I saw video that shows all the blades on props for engines 3 & 4 completely gone from the hub and engine 1 missing 2 blades as well. Good job on the Sky Pig's crew for getting it down in "one" piece with no deaths. From the looks of things they landed easily as there isn't a long deep trench behind it.
I would bet that Lockheed can fix it good as new depending on damage to the belly and gear doors.
My biggest gripe is the talking head stating 2 jets. While a Sky Pig has jet engines, it isn't a jet. ;)
Actually, their are four basic types of aircraft engines that could be described as turbine engines because they are powered by gas turbines: Turbojet, Turbofan, Turboprop, and Turboshaft engines.
As I was a jet engine mechanic in the Marines and as Mike Petro pointed out, there are 4 types of turbine engines. They all produce power in different ways. I repaired T-58-GE-16s while in the engine shop stationed on Okinawa, and once back stateside, I lateraled to the flight line and removed and installed them, as well as other repairs, when I wasn't flying that is (though I tried to fly as much as possible).
Some great airmanship landing the 130. I'm betting they didn't have time to dump the fuel they were hauling and they did the landing belly up with both right engines disabled. Good work guys!
Tanker aircraft was a Marine Aerial Refueler Transport Squadron 352 (VMGR-352) ‘Raiders’ KC-130T aircraft out of Miramar. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/VMGR-352
I agree with H Jones, how do you eject from a C-130? Just wish that when reporters cover a story that they would have a basic understanding of the subject they were reporting on!!!!!
I’m wondering how a reporter is going to have an understanding of all the subjects he or she is assigned to report. Used to be editors, fact checkers, had reporters back. Nowadays not so much. You ask questions, make your best judgement that you’re getting knowledgeable answers, try to find at least two people who tell the same story, and do your best.
Reporters generally don't know much of what they are reporting about. They only know to report but do not have subject matter expertise in much of what they do. That's the problem.
It appears from the damage that the F-35 clipped the 130, not the other way around, as indicated in the tagline. The apparent damage seems consistent with a the case of the receiver pilot's misestimating the rate of closure on the 130, momentarily lost SA, and flew into the tanker from behind. All remains unsubstantiated until we get a some kind of report, but that's how it looks from here, at this point.
I am a paratrooper. Side doors and tailgate open in flight. Except for SOF all or jumps are ripcord. AF emergency chutes are activated manually with a ripcord (that thingy in front that looks like a handle). While I wouldn’t expect a reporter to know this I would exit them to do a simple check. Google even has pictures.
Yes I know what a static line is. The way the statement was phrased I felt static line would mean nothing..to my knowledge no military aircraft is equipped with the Cirrus system. You know......with all the speculation we should follow our our own advice and taken a 5 minute stroll down the Google lane. Everything asked is answered.
How does one "eject" from a 130? No 130 I ever flew/saw had ejection seats. Additionally if the truck crew bailed out, they could do that, who landed it?
Thinking the same thing. The reporter probably thought "George" did! Or maybe he thought after the crew bailed out, the KC-130 self-deployed parachutes (a la Cirrus) and gently let itself down on the road. SMH.
Talk about weird; I'd recently commented on VMGR-352 "QB" TRANSPACS back in the '70s, out of MCAS El Toro, when I crewed on the R's. On one of those return gaggles to El Toro in the "command" 130, halfway btwn Hickam (we parked there, the A-4's at MCAS Kaneohe Bay), we almost/almost had a midair. Orbiting and waiting for the fast-movers to arrive, another 130 got out of place. Talk about close - my entire view from the starboard waist window was obscured by the other 130; with the UNITED STATES MARINES livery (port side) gliding by at an upward 30° angle - our wings overlapping. Needless to say, one of the PIC's went buh-bye.
Our tax dollars at work. You would think that we don't have a working air traffic control system, and that planes are just so cheap, crashing them is NBD. It gives such a great feeling to know that our military is so capable. And what's an 'refueling evolution'?
But it could have been worse. No humans were lost in this episode. They shouldn't ever be able to fly again, but who knows. Sad...
Do yourself a favor and listen to the ATC recording that is online. They were working a block altitude in the Kane West MOA. ATC services were not being used, and further more. You and I were not in the flight deck of either aircraft, so who are we to judge their actions?? Wait for the official accident report, then feel free to cast your judgement
Who ever said it was no big deal? Just cause the press says all was ok dododo... doesn’t mean the people involved and the operators have the same lassé fair attitude.
이 웹 사이트는 쿠키를 사용합니다. 이 웹 사이트를 사용하고 탐색함으로써 귀하는 이러한 쿠기 사용을 수락하는 것입니다.
종료
FlightAware 항공편 추적이 광고로 지원된다는 것을 알고 계셨습니까?
FlightAware.com의 광고를 허용하면 FlightAware를 무료로 유지할 수 있습니다. Flightaware에서는 훌륭한 경험을 제공할 수 있도록 관련성있고 방해되지 않는 광고를 유지하기 위해 열심히 노력하고 있습니다. FlightAware에서 간단히 광고를 허용 하거나 프리미엄 계정을 고려해 보십시오..