Please look at the flip side of the coin too. Your position also means that you think I should be prohibited from taking a ride in a historical plane even when I'm willing to share the cost of operating the plane.
You miss the point. Yes, those that are in the museums would still be there but the ones that are flying today wouldn't exist. If museums want them all they have to do in buy them and take them off flight status. If people want them in museums then those people should spend their money and buy them and donate them to a museum. The good people who restored FIFI would not have spent the time and money to restore FIFI if they couldn't fly her, and therefore FIFI would not exist today.
And I agree with what may appear to be "profit motivated", but it is really "revenue motivated". They simply cannot do what we need then to do on membership fees alone. They need other sources of revenue or our membership fees would be completely unaffordable. And over the past few years some of there member services have totally sucked. And I told that to Craig Fuller in person.
이 웹 사이트는 쿠키를 사용합니다. 이 웹 사이트를 사용하고 탐색함으로써 귀하는 이러한 쿠기 사용을 수락하는 것입니다.
종료
FlightAware 항공편 추적이 광고로 지원된다는 것을 알고 계셨습니까?
FlightAware.com의 광고를 허용하면 FlightAware를 무료로 유지할 수 있습니다. Flightaware에서는 훌륭한 경험을 제공할 수 있도록 관련성있고 방해되지 않는 광고를 유지하기 위해 열심히 노력하고 있습니다. FlightAware에서 간단히 광고를 허용 하거나 프리미엄 계정을 고려해 보십시오..