did you bother to read the article or you just decided to comment first?

(Written on 2019/12/10)(Permalink)

it is apparent you did not read the article.

(Written on 2019/12/10)(Permalink)

You definitely missed the part where Boeing offered a subsidy. We don't know the details of it but I am sure Boeing is doing something really costly to rival Airbus.

(Written on 2019/11/25)(Permalink)

It is a temporary and immediate solution that will in many ways be subsidized. Qantas would be naive to not give it a look. I am sure Boeing will do almost anything to keep Qantas from going to Airbus.

(Written on 2019/11/25)(Permalink)

They did the same thing for many Airbus models... so what point are you tryna to make?

(Written on 2019/07/20)(Permalink)

*i think the blame should partially fall

(Written on 2019/06/26)(Permalink)

I think you need to the blame falls on the government for removing the funding that required them to switch to a system that did not provide direct oversight of the certification process.

(Written on 2019/06/26)(Permalink)

As hopeful as many are for that I don’t think it’ll be that bad. At worst I see January.

(Written on 2019/06/26)(Permalink)

This plane is gonna be the safest thing in the skies once the work is complete...

(Written on 2019/06/26)(Permalink)

Blaming Boeing (justified) but neglecting to also blame the agency in charge of oversight is in fact ignoring the big picture. If you add the FAA to the equation then you have to remember those who are in charge of funding them.

(Written on 2019/06/18)(Permalink)