Contrary to a seemingly popular belief among the left, what you guys call hate speech is protected by the first amendment. Otherwise, the first amendment would be meaningless as whichever party is in power could arbitrarily decide anything they disagree with constitutes “hate speech.”

(Written on 2019/06/01)(Permalink)

You’ve just repeated the same assertion without providing any sources. I’ll assume from the personal attack that you don’t have any, so I’m done here.

(Written on 2019/06/01)(Permalink)

That was done at a number of locations when the controversy started, and I seem to recall the coverage actually increased business, or at worst had no effect. But I agree, that would be the correct course of action.

(Written on 2019/05/31)(Permalink)

The Colorado bakery was a private business, whereas the airport is a public institution supported by federal tax dollars, so the laws in effect are different. But in any event, the court ruled that the local board had shown bias against the bakery, without rendering any judgement on the bakery refusing service to the gay customer. So actually, siding with the bakery and with Chick-Fil-A is logically consistent.

(Written on 2019/05/31)(Permalink)

Yeah, who knew all those inner city gangsters were really just artists?

(Written on 2019/05/31)(Permalink)

Bit ironic here considering Scott Kirby has been responsible for much of the hit to United’s reputation lately.

(Written on 2019/05/31)(Permalink)

Local policy still can’t violate federal law. There’s decades of precedent allowing for this.

(Written on 2019/05/31)(Permalink)

It turns out it is the job of the FAA to oversee airport concessions, so this isn’t overreach. Your claims against CFA regarding discriminatory hiring and firing aren’t supported by the facts. It’s pretty ironic (and frightening) to see so many people supporting government-sanctioned discrimination as a response to some perceived injustice. If you don’t like who CFA supports, feel free not to patronize them, but it’s unreasonable to expect a government institution to prevent them from operating under the guise of what you call “accountability.”

(Written on 2019/05/31)(Permalink)

That’s a pretty outlandish claim - got any sources to support it?

(Written on 2019/05/31)(Permalink)

The complaint was that Chick-Fil-A wasn’t allowed to open two airport locations for no reason other than their respective city councils objecting to the company founder’s religious views. It sounds to me as though CFA was the one discriminated against because of hypocrites on the far left, eh?

(Written on 2019/05/31)(Permalink)