모두
|
Comments
Yet another instance of inaccurate "ratings" being given to a photo. This is a clean, crisp, HQ snap, taken in difficult full-overhead sun light conditions, of a wonderful GA bird, but after four votes have been given, I see the overall rating is 3.75. Seriously? 3.75? This is a full five shot. I admit to a small bit of bias: the Pilatus is my #1 fave propbird, but even if I weren't biased, a 3.75 average means someone, at least one and possibly more than one, had to have voted this shot either "3" or lower?
OK, end of rant. This one is a primo 5, Clement. A tip of the cap to you.
OK, end of rant. This one is a primo 5, Clement. A tip of the cap to you.
Thank You, Gary, Much appreciated !
I'll have to say the same as Gary. The reflection of the wing on the side of the aircraft blends nicely with the wavy paint scheme. My only question is why did you cut off part of the tail?
Chris; It was just due to the lens I had on the camera at the time, that i was at STS. Have developed an interest in the PC12 since I first heard of AMELIA ROSE EARHART (2014) making her around the world trip in one.
활동 로그
1998년까지 거슬러 가는 N576RG에 대한 완전한 이력 검색을 원하십니까? 지금 구매하세요. 1시간 이내에 구하십시오.
|
날짜 | 항공기 | 출발지 | 행선지 | 출발 | 도착 | 비행시간 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No Recent History Data | ||||||
기본 사용자 (기본 사용자가 되는 것은 무료이고 쉽습니다!) 3 months 이력 보기. 참여 |
Please log in or register to post a comment.