모두
|
McDonnell Douglas DC-10 (N313FE)
Awaiting her final flight. 01-04-23
Comments
NOT A DC-10!!!! We re-did the pilot configuration from 3 to 2 and re-named them MD-10!
Wendell. well technically yes, you are correct. I'm well aware of the DC-10/MD-10 debate. I understand the flight deck differences/type certificates, etc. I just don't care. She was born a DC-10, to me she will always be a DC-10. At this point, who really cares? You are welcome to post your own DC-10/MD-10 pics and call them whatever you want. Happy New Year to you.
According to the ICAO, a Boeing MD-10 is still a type designator of DC10, as John has entered it.
Thank you Samuel. I appreciate your input. Here is another way of looking at this Wendall. You were born Wendall. As you age, you may have to get a few new replacement parts, perhaps a new knee, a new heart, even a new/mechanical heart or other joints. Heck, you might even get some bionic parts. Lets look at our servicemen & women who end up having to get various prosthetics. Now, just cuz we change some parts out of you, you are still the same "person". You get a new ticker, new limbs, etc. they might enable you to run farther, faster, with more energy, etc. Do we start calling you a new name because you have some new parts in you? The answer obviously is "NO" That is kind of how I look at this "DC/MD" debate. 90% of you is still original. Same with the DC-10. If anything, the "MD" is more of a hybrid/marketing name. We are still talking about the same aircraft here. If I look at my type certificate on my pilots license, does it say DC10, or MD-10? Bottom line here is enjoy the few we have left, and agree to disagree, call them whatever you are most comfortable with.
Awesome shot, John
Thanks Hayden!
활동 로그
1998년까지 거슬러 가는 N313FE에 대한 완전한 이력 검색을 원하십니까? 지금 구매하세요. 1시간 이내에 구하십시오.
|
날짜 | 항공기 | 출발지 | 행선지 | 출발 | 도착 | 비행시간 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No Recent History Data | ||||||
기본 사용자 (기본 사용자가 되는 것은 무료이고 쉽습니다!) 3 months 이력 보기. 참여 |
Please log in or register to post a comment.