Back to Squawk list
  • 26

United Airlines captain aborts transatlantic journey; diverts plane to Heathrow for additional de-icing

제출됨
 
Ninety minutes after taking off from Brussels pilot decides he is not satisfied with de-icing. (www.dailymail.co.uk) 기타...

Sort type: [Top] [Newest]


svalbard
Next we will learn it was crickets swarming over the Sahara....the real cause!
727stretch
Yep, i bet this was an anti-ice valve issue or something similar - not DE-icing issue.
hilltop180
Ice sublimates above 250kt. To take off, climb, and cruise for 90 minutes would remove any amount of residual ice left by a bad de-ice job. United is hiding something, landing because of ice is BS. Shame on United for lying.
joelwiley
http://flightaware.com/live/flight/UAL951/history/20141227/1110Z/EBBR/KBOS
seems to indicate diversion was to KBOS rather than EGGL. Potayto, Potahto
EbunkerD
If the flight in question diverted due to de-icing, then the Earth is flat! The real reason will soon be uncovered. What makes me mad about this is United's pilot and or their PR arm thinks the public are idiots.
Sounds like something more mundane like an incapacitated crew member.
preacher1
Well, it may not be either one. It may be the reporter as ChuckMe has stated here below. At any rate, I expect we have heard all about this that we are going to.
dupre
Landing elsewhere due to inadequate de-icing on the ground prior to takeoff ,does not make sense. Airplane anti-ice systems failure while airborne maybe.
JillBazeley
Sorry I'm late to this discussion but I have a question, and as a former reporter myself, am eager to understand things correctly. What ice does the anti-ice system prevent? An earlier poster said ice sublimates past 250 knots.
jfitz1414
Terrorist threat maybe, then a very fishy cover story to keep the masses cowed.
esu589
As you go through life there are a few things you learn: Reporters are usually incompetent, they never let facts interfere with a story, they paraphrase to the point where the story is completely convoluted.
joelwiley
That is somewhat an over generalization. Similar to " the actions of 99% of lawyers spoils the image of the rest of them"

[This poster has been suspended.]

THRUSTT
THRUSTT 1
Where the hell have u been, vacationing on the retirement check???
jmilazzo
Sounds like someone doesn't have their story straight!!!! Either there was a malfunction in the ain't I-icing system as stated here or they experienced sever icing that they couldn't get out of and diverted.
dctwooze
I BET THIS WAS AN ENG ANTI-ICE ECAM OR WINDOW HEAT MESSAGE.
preacher1
Well, like I said, something not being told. If anti ice was no good, he wouldn't have left in the 1st place, at least I wouldn't have.
dctwooze
TRUE BUT SOMETIMES THESE THINGS HAPPEN AT THE WORST TIMES LIKE RIGHT BEFORE YOU GET YOUR OCEANIC CLNC. THAT SUCKS. ATLEAST THEY WERE STILL OVER LAND FOR THE DIVERSION INSTEAD OF 30w.
preacher1
Turn off your cap locks if you ain't mad or yelling.
THRUSTT
THRUSTT 3
WE HEAR YA LT!!!
huskey
huskey -2
YOU ARE FIREDDDD!!!!
Sean24
Sean24 2
Anti-ICE EICAS message rt ENG
pilot62
ON what planet do you hold before landing to get a better de-ice, they would have burned enough fuel beforehand, unless that was just for traffic.
preacher1
preacher1 15
After being airborne for an hour and a half, there is bound to be something else here not being told. The de-icing generally gets you off the ground in good stead. An hour and a half into the flight would indicate something to me. IMHO
cm5299
Chuck Me 6
I bet we are being told everything. I'd bet the reporter just didn't understand when they were told and paraphrased incorrectly. We know reporters and airplanes are like oil and water.

Reporter probably told there was a problem with anti ice system. Article actually quotes UA saying mechanical issue.
asellitto
Reporter must have been a relative of Ashleigh Banfield, the ditzy blonde CNN reporter who gets everything wrong when it comes to aircraft.
preacher1
10-4, makes since, particularly since it was the daily mail.
btweston
btweston 0
Bear in mind that the Daily Mail is the UK version of the National Inquirer. I guarantee that there is more to the story, but this is what we get.
joelwiley
Unless it was the frost-free compartment on the Flight Deck Refrigerator... not likely.
chris13
Yeah, I'm with you on this one. This is too odd and deicing is BS. If you're not properly deiced, you don't take off. 90 minutes in, there should be no ice on the aircraft at all.
preacher1
That's kinda what sounded fishy to me. If something on the plane ain't working to keep the ice off, that's one thing but it didn't say anything about that. Don't they know we have to have detail. LOL

로그인

계정을 가지고 계십니까? 사용자 정의된 기능, 비행 경보 및 더 많은 정보를 위해 지금(무료) 등록하세요!
FlightAware 항공편 추적이 광고로 지원된다는 것을 알고 계셨습니까?
FlightAware.com의 광고를 허용하면 FlightAware를 무료로 유지할 수 있습니다. Flightaware에서는 훌륭한 경험을 제공할 수 있도록 관련성있고 방해되지 않는 광고를 유지하기 위해 열심히 노력하고 있습니다. FlightAware에서 간단히 광고를 허용 하거나 프리미엄 계정을 고려해 보십시오..
종료