Back to Squawk list
  • 7

Air Force finds new KC-46 deficiencies

제출됨
 
The U.S. Air Force has added two new technical issues to the KC-46 tanker’s list of problems, potentially throwing a wrench into the projected delivery of the first tanker in October. (www.defensenews.com) 기타...

Sort type: [Top] [Newest]


joelwiley
I spent the day at the airshow at KMHR, wandering thru among others, the KC10 & KC135, and chatting with the boom operators. It seemed to me that you lose something with the removal of the Mark IV eyeball from the equation.

There was also an exhibit from Creech AFB. It occurred to me that with the KC46, somebody who has no idea of what the interior of an A/C sounds or smells like, is going to decide that, if we can do a predator there, why not a refueling boom? That their opinion will carry weight, disturbs me greatly. No, not disturbs, scares.
djames225
Joel..what scares you has scared many even more and somewhere along the line, the air force higher ups should be getting a boot in the ass..Boeing already has 8 of these modded 767 tankers out there..after major glitches which first cropped out were fixed, they seem to be working well for the other forces. Soo WTH is wrong with the 46's? Who or what entity messed up something that was working?
royhunte92
The main problem with Boeing is they have forgotten why they do what they do. From Simon Sinek's book 'Start with Why'; (my words)if you focus on your what without your why problems begin. Boeing needs to get back to why they exist then they will have less internal problems... otherwise a great aircraft manufacturer.
bbabis
bbabis 2
I’m sure replacing a simple window with an elaborate camera and feedback system seemed like a good idea at the time.
djames225
Its been working on 8 units delivered..4 to Japan and 4 to Italy..like I said above, Boeing is paying less attention to the saying if it isnt broke, dont fix it
jbqwik
jbqwik 4
What bothers me most is that Boeing agreed to a tough contract. Things were fine until the going got tough. When money started flowing from their own pocket to correct the many mistakes -instead of our government covering their f-ups- then it's like they forgot how to build airplanes.
Hate to be down on such a historically important American company but the last 10-15 years has seen major management missteps with labor, technology, production methods.
jbqwik
jbqwik 5
The feedback issue might be software fixable. The other concerns the handling of the boom, which, for a boom operator could make flying the boom difficult. It sounds to me like these deficiencies were noted by experienced operators, not factory techs.
I agree that it seems that once Boeing got the contract their focus and enthusiasm turned to other things, such as ramping-up production of their commercial lines.
djames225
Ok am I missing something here or is the stupidity level this high?..Boeing has already missed 2 delivery deadlines of the first 18 and are on track for a third, and you order another 10? What happens if more deficiencies show up? "The refueling system has been tested extensively — we have a well-tested system that works.” If it worked, the Air Force would not have found more Cat 1 screw ups.
talbotent
When will this end? Have Boeing never made a refueling boom before?
djames225
What really amazes me is, Boeing have already built and delivered 8 KC-767 tankers..they are flying and refuelling both Italian and Japan forces, so WTH did they do to screw up a simple "take it from here and put it there" approach?? The booms on them are remote operated, the wing pods had issues and Boeing re-designed them and they work.
Me thinks Boeing has taken 2 simple tasks, "KISS" and "If it isn't broke, don't fix it" and broken them both.

로그인

계정을 가지고 계십니까? 사용자 정의된 기능, 비행 경보 및 더 많은 정보를 위해 지금(무료) 등록하세요!
FlightAware 항공편 추적이 광고로 지원된다는 것을 알고 계셨습니까?
FlightAware.com의 광고를 허용하면 FlightAware를 무료로 유지할 수 있습니다. Flightaware에서는 훌륭한 경험을 제공할 수 있도록 관련성있고 방해되지 않는 광고를 유지하기 위해 열심히 노력하고 있습니다. FlightAware에서 간단히 광고를 허용 하거나 프리미엄 계정을 고려해 보십시오..
종료