Back to Squawk list
  • 29

Pratt's $10 Billion Bet Stumbles As Buyers Turn to GE Jet Engine

제출됨
 
Pratt & Whitney's $10 billion bet on a new jet engine is faltering after a troubled rollout, and buyers are rushing to a General Electric model instead. (www.chicagotribune.com) 기타...

Sort type: [Top] [Newest]


akita1
Barring any major mechanical failures, software in this day and age of FADEC’s can make or break an engines efficacy & success. Most major airframe advancements have been preceded by major engine advancements. Having said that, I am amazed at all the rhetoric about the new technology GTF’s. Does anyone remember the Garrett/AiResearch/AlliedSignal/Honeywell 731 engine from 1972. GTF’s are not new. Every engine manufacture has its own engineering way of doing systems in its engines and it usually follows all the way up through the manufactures line of models. GE engines tend to be more complicated (Swiss watch) in their design whereas Pratt-&-Whitney engines tend to be more simple mechanical designs (Russian Nagoya Tractor Works) but they triple control everything electronically. On any new engine design there is always a fight between what the engine manufacture designed and what the airframe manufacture wants the engine to do. Given time and money it usually works its self out.
Pratt-&-Whitney for many years flew Learjet 36-001 as a test aircraft with a 731 engine on the left side and whatever P&W engine it was testing on the right.
Yes I do remember the R-1830’s. What’s the old saying, “If God had intended man to fly with flat motors, Pratt-&-Whitney would have built one.
PegLegGuy
.
.
Do planes ever fly with different engines?

Pratt on one wing, GE on the other.

.
sparkie624
No... That would always be unbalanced thrust... Also, usually 1 will compliment the other especially with the FADEC's.. It is either GE, Pratt, or Rolls Royce.
cgh2430
One has to learn to let the clutch pedal out slowly. Once mastered, a GTF can be driven, aside from downshifting, even without depression of the clutch pedal.
djames225
I think Bombardier must have mastered it then..Airbus is in too much a hurry..lol
sparkie624
I always like Pratt Engines... Cut my teeth working on the JT8-D's.... And I love the old R-1830's... Any one who does know what an R-1830 is is too young to ask... They have always made great engines and have supported us through many wars!
djames225
Working on those 1830's in the cold wasn't fun though...think Northwest Territories wintertime in Canada..lol
Cadefoster
Interesting how people were saying a little while back that GE has to develop a geared solution of their own to be competitive.
TorstenHoff
I don't think the P&W problems in any way invalidate the need for GTFs -- they are more fuel efficient and quieter than traditional turbofans, and we'll see most new jet designs adopt GTF's until they eventually go all-electric.

Teething problems with new technology are nothing new, even the turbofans whose reliability we take for granted today started out having massive problems.
djames225
What is odd is how the C-Series, which runs the Pratt GTF had a few stumbles but were fixed pronto...I have a feeling its more of a software issue causing other issues
sparkie624
They did have some stumbles early on.... And so did GE... Look at TACA Air with the GE CFM-34 Dual Flame Out landing dead stick near NASA... I doubt airbus would have faired as well.
djames225
Yes sparkie..I remember the TACA landing on that canal jetty (also Mayday did an episode on it)..but what I am saying is, the Pratt on the C-Series isnt much different in design, if any, than that on those Airbus...I've said it before and will continue to say it...I think the software between the Airbus side and Pratt side like having arguments, so to speak, and so do the engineers..the GE LEAP engines aren't much different than modern turbofan engines of today, and so the Airbus software is a happy sod.
sparkie624
Keep on mind that Pratt has decades more experience than any other US engine manufacture... Only other one even close is Rolls Royce as far as what is still around now days.

로그인

계정을 가지고 계십니까? 사용자 정의된 기능, 비행 경보 및 더 많은 정보를 위해 지금(무료) 등록하세요!
FlightAware 항공편 추적이 광고로 지원된다는 것을 알고 계셨습니까?
FlightAware.com의 광고를 허용하면 FlightAware를 무료로 유지할 수 있습니다. Flightaware에서는 훌륭한 경험을 제공할 수 있도록 관련성있고 방해되지 않는 광고를 유지하기 위해 열심히 노력하고 있습니다. FlightAware에서 간단히 광고를 허용 하거나 프리미엄 계정을 고려해 보십시오..
종료