Back to Squawk list
  • 3

New U.S. Stealth Jet Can’t Fire Its Gun Until 2019

제출됨
 
America’s $400 billion Joint Strike Fighter, or F-35, is slated to join fighter squadrons next year—but missing software will render its 25mm cannon useless. (www.thedailybeast.com) 기타...

Sort type: [Top] [Newest]


joelwiley
It just gets better and better. When it finally does work, 180 - 220 rounds at 3,300 rounds per minute the load will last what 2 - 3 seconds? Great CAS replacement for the A-10.
preacher1
Well one person said about enough for a good tactical burst and hope you don't miss. They are supposed to replace the A10 which is revered for it's cannon and CAS. And then somebody at the end says they can't envision the need for a gun anyway. Somebody, probably retired now, said that about the F4 too, but they forgot to tell the MIG's over North Vietnam.
canuck44
canuck44 2
As one observer noted, the problem with the A-10 and the Kiowa chopper is that they are both bought and paid for.
preacher1
Back in the day, the USAF was separated from the Army in order to develop it's own tactics and all, that being one reason. They were given close air support as one of those missions. They either need to maintain the A10 and provide it, provide it with something besides the F35, or give that mission and the A10's to the Army and not have to fool with it anymore.
preacher1
What they really need to do is ask Saddam's boys over there what they thought of it, but oh wait, I forgot, we ain't gonna need a gun for anything.
canuck44
canuck44 1
One of the Canadians on the RCN forum noted that after the two second burst exhausts the ammunition the pilot can always give them the finger on the way by.
preacher1
That would really get the attention of them ISIS folks.LOL
preacher1
Hunk a junk. Kill the program. Remodel all it's replacements and turn 'em loose. Development time is gonna outlast program time if we aren't careful.
blueashflyer
Since when does software control the gun? Give me the old MASTER ARM switch and a big red trigger button on the stick anyday.
joelwiley
The F-35 cannot operate without computers. Come to think of it, there may be some question about whether it can operate with them.
preacher1
The F35 is 95% software. Somebody was complaining the other day about the millions of lines of code that it had.
joelwiley
Got Lockheed stock?
http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2015/01/18/lockheed-has-an-f-35-stealth-fighter-but-can-it-sh.aspx
ColinSeftel
Things are even worse in the UK. The Royal Navy is building two carriers designed for STOVL F-35B's, which won't be delivered before 2020. The first carrier HMS Queen Elizabeth was launched in 2014 will begin sea trials next year and construction of the second, HMS Price of Wales, is about half complete. Until the F-35Bs are delivered, they will be the biggest and most expensive helicopter carriers ever!
preacher1
How can we say BIGGEST BOODOGGLE AND SNAFU loud enough for somebody to listen. We just elected a ne Senator that is a vet of both Iraq and Afghanistan and I have Emailed him and our other is already on record as an opponent. Let's jack them all up and let them see just how far downhill the GOOD OLD BOYS network has taken them. There are some things in life that are past ridiculous and this is one of them.IMHO
pirahna432
Is it just me, or is that something that should really stay classified? Why give away a tactical disadvantage like that?
joelwiley
You have a good point, and pursuing it could well drift off topic. With the electronic intelligence gathering capabilities of nation states, I don't think that countries that could potentially confront America have the slightest problem in gleaning this information.

I am concerned that the litany of incapabilities of the F-35 being developed as 'all things for all branches (and failing them all)' will be placing our armed forces personnel and our national security at an unacceptable risk. Classification of this information would merely keep it from the awareness of the taxpaying public who will be footing the bill, and burying their dead. Not that I have much expectation that the public will take note.
iflyfsx
iflyfsx 1
Unacceptable risk? That's a very distant priority. This is all about money, politics, and self-interest. What about unacceptable corruption and fraud? We seem to accept all this crap just fine, which is why it continues to roll on, and we will keep buying F-35s.

로그인

계정을 가지고 계십니까? 사용자 정의된 기능, 비행 경보 및 더 많은 정보를 위해 지금(무료) 등록하세요!
FlightAware 항공편 추적이 광고로 지원된다는 것을 알고 계셨습니까?
FlightAware.com의 광고를 허용하면 FlightAware를 무료로 유지할 수 있습니다. Flightaware에서는 훌륭한 경험을 제공할 수 있도록 관련성있고 방해되지 않는 광고를 유지하기 위해 열심히 노력하고 있습니다. FlightAware에서 간단히 광고를 허용 하거나 프리미엄 계정을 고려해 보십시오..
종료