← Back to Squawk list

43

The world’s largest airplane may be grounded after a single flight

4년 전 제출됨

The aerospace company founded by Paul Allen, Stratolaunch, is closing operations according to a report by Reuters that cited anonymous sources. The company will cease its efforts to challenge traditional aerospace companies in a new “space race,” four people familiar with the matter told the wire service. In response to a query from Ars about potentially ending operations, a spokeswoman for the Seattle-based company replied, "We don’t have any news or announcements to share at this time.… (arstechnica.com) 기타...

Torsten Hoff

37 멤버 코멘트

Sort type: [Top] [Newest]

Pablo Rogina 4년 전 4

I cannot think of similar destiny as of the Hughes H-4 Hercules "Spruce Goose". Could be the curse of the "biggest" ever airplanes?

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Report

djames225 4년 전 3

Not really...AN 225 was resurrected and is very productive in it's use. Antonov may even upgrade the engines, since the Ukraine fall out with Russia, to CF6-80C2 engines.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report

Pablo Rogina 4년 전 3

Good point.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report

lynx318 4년 전 1

Never understood why it wasn't called the 'Birch Bird', what it was actually made from. Non-factual media journos again to be blamed.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report

djames225 4년 전 1

Or the Hughes Hauler

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report

Craig Northacker 4년 전 2

Son of Spruce Goose flies, er, doesn’t

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Report

jetmaninmo 4년 전 4

An "anonymous source" is like saying "someone said..." They should not be taken seriously.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Report

siriusloon 4년 전 5

Says someone whose "name" is jetmaninmo.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report

djames225 4년 전 2

I actually believe it, and I am betting the source is an employee who knows it wouldn't work.
To get payloads launched properly, and on the cheap, Stratolaunch would need to fly around 35,000 ft+ and reach speeds in excess of 300mph, with a payload. I think they flew it to say it did work to fly, to prove Paul was right that it could fly, but that's all it did. Remember, they had already cancelled the actual craft that would be used.
And now with Cosmic Girl and LauncherOne already flight tested...........

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report

lynx318 4년 전 0

Worried that one test is concluded as all it can do. Max expected altitude seems as borderline but the planned max speed is 530mph, it just hasn't had the throttles opened up yet.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report

djames225 4년 전 1

Planned max speed was no payload. if the payload was smaller than planned, than perhaps and remember, they already cancelled that. Don't get me wrong as it is a fantastic looking beast and Paul was on the right track, but that's just it. It's a beast, and even AN225 could not launch off its back unless it lost some weight and increased it's payload speed.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report

ken young 4년 전 0

"Anonymous"..Once again, so called journalists hiding behind the first amendment which allows laziness, negligence and libel.
I see "anonymous" and I automatically call BEE ESS

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report

Robert Fleming 4년 전 2

So basically that plane and the program that developed it was one GIANT waste of time and $$$$? Wonderful!

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Report

Jim Quinn 4년 전 4

I'm not sure however I'm hoping that it involved private funding only, and not any taxpayer support.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report

[This comment has been downvoted. Show anyway.]

Jim Quinn 4년 전 3

You're certainly taking some liberties and making assumptions with that statement.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report

[This comment has been downvoted. Show anyway.]

Jim Quinn 4년 전 10

He shouldn't have brought politics into the conversation and make assumptions of my beliefs, just as you have done.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report

siriusloon 4년 전 4

You're right, damn that Paul Allen for dying mid-project. What a self-centred monster.

Just out of curiosity, if he'd spent the equivalent sum of HIS OWN MONEY on anything else of his own choosing, why would that be of any concern to you?

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report

cowboybob 4년 전 2

Spruce Goose...."vanity project"? Hardly. Best study up on these things before sounding off.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Report

lynx318 4년 전 5

Agreed, if I recall without looking it up, it was an attempt for a government contract that failed only because WW2 ended.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report

sparkie624 4년 전 1

It did look interesting to see it flying, but that was about it...

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Report

Chris DiCenso 4년 전 1

But how many "small payloads" would it take to equal the one payload of any of the companies John Miller mentioned and would it still be cheaper?

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Report

djames225 4년 전 1

Average price of a SpaceX launch is about $57 Mil...Average cost on Virgin and their "Cosmic Girl" since Stratolaunch closed already, is about $12 Mil

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report

PBADC3 4년 전 1

Virgin's real competition are companies like Rocket Lab, whose "Electron" rocket can put a 500 lb payload into low earth orbit for under $6M.

https://www.airspacemag.com/as-next/milestone-180968351/

BTW, I love the choice of name... The real rockets nerds will get it.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report

djames225 4년 전 2

Not competition at all, considering the 12 MIL is priced for a single 1,100 lb payload. If the payload is lighter and hitch hikers want aboard, the costs will be on par with Rocket Lab's hitch hiker rates. Branson is actually rooting for Rocket Lab..it will keep all the "big players" on their toes.
Plus Cosmic Girl is not bounded by launching in 1 or 2 places. For example, Branson signed up with ANA to also launch payloads from Japan.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report

Chris DiCenso 4년 전 1

Thanks for replying so quickly. Now these prices you mentioned are they for equal size payload amounts?

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report

djames225 4년 전 1

No and that is what gives these aerial launch platforms an advantage for smaller payloads..SpaceX, Blue Origin and ULA are big payload launchers..if u have a couple low weight LEO sats to place in orbit Virgin et all can do it quickly and cheaper.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report

Chris DiCenso 4년 전 1

Yes, I see your point. "...if u have a couple low weight LEO sats to place in orbit"
definitely the way to go.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report

skylab72 4년 전 1

"Stratolaunch remains operational." When Richard Branson can gain control of these assets at a price he likes he'll have another launch vehicle...

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Report

djames225 4년 전 2

Considering same company/individuals developed and built for both, I could see it happen. Although I remember wayy back when Allen envisioned Stratolaunch, Branson thot it was too big. Remember he already had shown his identical vehicle, White Knight. Allen thought it too small.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report

skylab72 4년 전 1

Paul already paid for the big, if Richard has a need he'll use it.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report

djames225 4년 전 2

Yes...I was referring to Burt Rutan and Scaled Composites as the developer/builder of the vehicles Stratolaunch, SpaceShip 1&2, White Knight...they were also to have built a launch vehicle for Stratolaunch, but it got cancelled.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report

skylab72 4년 전 2

Yup, I know. Been a huge Burt fan for years. Got to meet him very briefly, at Oshkosh 05, when Richard was doing his round the world non-stop on one jet engine victory lap.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report

jmilleratp 4년 전 1

I don't understand why this, or Virgin's effort, is advantageous to just launching a payload via SpaceX, Blue Origin or ULA.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Report

Devin Boyle 4년 전 2

It is much less expensive to launch a small payload from the upper atmosphere using a much smaller (or single) stage launch vehicle launched from an airborne platform.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report

siriusloon 4년 전 3

It would cost less, which is generally considered to be advantageous.

응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report

로그인

FlightAware 항공편 추적이 광고로 지원된다는 것을 알고 계셨습니까?

FlightAware.com의 광고를 허용하면 FlightAware를 무료로 유지할 수 있습니다. Flightaware에서는 훌륭한 경험을 제공할 수 있도록 관련성있고 방해되지 않는 광고를 유지하기 위해 열심히 노력하고 있습니다. FlightAware에서 간단히 광고를 허용 하거나 프리미엄 계정을 고려해 보십시오..

종료