JMARTINSON
| 멤버가 된 해 | |
| 온라인 마지막 접속 일시 | |
| 언어 | English (USA) |
I read somewhere it was 80,000 bananas
(Written on 2019/05/05)(Permalink)
What are you, some kind of commie? If the airline doesn't want an optional feature, they shouldn't have to buy it. The airlines know their markets, pilots, and passengers better than Boeing ever could.
(Written on 2019/05/05)(Permalink)
A-HA! So you don't know! enhance pitch stability so that it feels and flies like other 737s isn't exactly the same thing as inherently unstable (like it's a B2 or something). You guys are kind of mean with your down votes thing. Nobody likes me!
(Written on 2019/05/02)(Permalink)
Click the link there, partner.
(Written on 2019/05/01)(Permalink)
Well of course it's pointless when the basis of your argument is a 172 pilot having a better understanding of a 737 than a 737 pilot does. Q: If the aircraft wasn't "inherently unstable", why did Boeing add the MCAS? A: I'm just some idiot with an internet connection, so heck if I know. Maybe he does: https://youtu.be/KB4lCbT5oX8?t=657
(Written on 2019/05/01)(Permalink)
There you are! What took so long? I was starting to worry. I'm not saying anything other than maybe the iee guy is wrong and the max is actually not "inherently unstable" like he claims it is. And if he is wrong, it's not unreasonable to wonder if he might be wrong about something else. The alternative is to assume he's perfect except for just that one thing. If it turns out the airplane is not inherently unstable, you can still hate Boeing you know. Anyway, your last sentence is my point. You'll accept any experience, training, or education as authoritative as long as it aligns with your position, and you'll dismiss them just as easily when they don't (or change the subject, attack the messenger, type IN ALL CAPS, click the down arrow, or whatever). You said it yourself, you could care less....like being incapable of changing your mind is a good thing. It's not good, it's irrational. As a coder you should know that. It's also confirmation bias at it's best.
(Written on 2019/05/01)(Permalink)
777 captain also certified on 737s vs. Software developer 172 pilot https://youtu.be/KB4lCbT5oX8?t=626 Keep hitting that down arrow if it makes you feel better.
(Written on 2019/05/01)(Permalink)
the link to the article is fine, it's the links in the article itself that were (and still are) the problem.
(Written on 2019/04/29)(Permalink)
1. Ethiopian Air is owned by the Ethiopian government. (https://www.ethiopianairlines.com/corporate/company/about-us/overview) 2. The Ethiopian government is investigating the crash. (https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/04/world/asia/ethiopia-crash-boeing.html) 3. The Ethiopian Civil Aviation Authority has 3 investigators and an annual budget of less than $89,000 us (https://af.reuters.com/article/topNews/idAFKCN1R30RK-OZATP) 4. There are rules that govern how investigations should be conducted in regards to data sharing, evidence access, transparency, etc. These are not being followed. (https://www.airlineratings.com/news/ethiopian-737-investigation-questioned-crash-expert/) 5. France pulled flight-data and cockpit-voice recorder data, but Ethiopian officials will not allow them to interpret that data. This is highly irregular, yet Ethiopian authorities refuse to explain why. (https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-03-20/france-is-said-not-to-be-handling-
(Written on 2019/04/28)(Permalink)
로그인
