← Back to Squawk list
  • 22

First Revenue Flight for 747-8F

제출됨
 
Its inaugural cargo haul run (flightaware.com) 기타...

Ricky Scott
뉴스 정키친구우등생 명부ADS-B 피더대변인아마추어 사진사홍보인아나운서자서전 작가

Sort type: [Top] [Newest]


HunterTS4
Toby Sharp 0
I have a package on that flight wooo hooooO! naw jk
응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Report
sheka
mark tufts 0
would be interesting just to ride along
응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Report
HunterTS4
Toby Sharp 0
very impressive climb out and speed! may you have tail winds always !
응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Report
msp1735
Shad Nowak 0
i think it will be a fun plane to fly one once the inter-con comes out
응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Report
preacher1
preacher1 0
When did Cargolux settle their rift with Boeing and take delivery?
응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Report
canuck44
canuck44 0
Probably when the Qatar guy figured out that there were no suitable replacements available and the next Airbus freighter was going to be available sometime after the second coming. Also they were probably told that it would not be such a big deal to repaint it in Nippon Cargo or Cathay Pacific livery, either which could take delivery tomorrow.
응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report
geoffmartindale
Geoff Martindale 0
Sounds about right... =)
응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report
preacher1
preacher1 0
lol!!!!!!!
응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report
dbrooks84
David Brooks 0
So what aircraft did they deliver? CargoLux said no to the first two 747-8F aircraft. The registration on the aircraft delivered is LX-VCB and I though this was one of the initial two.
응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Report
geoffmartindale
Geoff Martindale 0
I believe you're thinking about Atlas Air.
응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report
dbrooks84
David Brooks 0
It was definitely Cargolux and there as topic on this forum about it. It was widely reported but exact terms that were used by Cargolux were believed to be on the GE engines and some others not revealed
응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report
preacher1
preacher1 0
David, I believe you are right and that goes back to my initial question this morning, WHEN DID THEY SETTLE THE RIFT? It may be like anything else. The refusal to make delivery was on page 1 but the settlent on page 6,lol.
응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report
w7psk
Ricky Scott 0
2nd one going out today. Appears however to not being going to Sea Tac but straight to Luxembourg

http://flightaware.com/live/flight/CLX789/history/20111013/1910Z/KPAE/ELLX
응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Report
w7psk
Ricky Scott 0
The one yesterday and the one today are the first two. They cleared things up with GE apparently. We in the trenches are not privy to what goes on.

I just know my minor part in this play has been frustrating/rewarding and was proud to watch it come over the Sim center landing at Sea Tac.

Im in the Sim Center cause we aint done yet, Intercon is next.
응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Report
geoffmartindale
Geoff Martindale 0
We'll never be done.
응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report
planeguy007
Bryan Jack 0
Here's the press release from Boeings website:
http://boeing.mediaroom.com/index.php?s=43&item=1970
응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Report
preacher1
preacher1 0
It's simply amazing that their press release says absolutely nothing about their tiff.
응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Report
canuck44
canuck44 0
Why would they...it would be like putting up pics of Tail Hook instead of telling the nice Congresslady that we had a cultural and information exchange with other naval aviators.
응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report
preacher1
preacher1 0
lol!!!!!!!!
응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report
dbrooks84
David Brooks 0
No reason why Boeing to air dirty linen. Being retired Boeing guy, I would never release info like that. It would have to be the customer or a whistle blower.
응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report
Derg
Roland Dent 0
David there are certain issue that need a whistle blown as you are well aware and the FAA are often not too responsive. This airplane has the best pedigree is the business: "The new GEnx-2B67 engines incorporate the latest technologies – such as a composite fan case and blades and a revolutionary turbine – to create double-digit efficiency gains over the engines it replaces." That is the master stroke.
응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report
dbrooks84
David Brooks 0
I would agree with you if the problem with the engines was safety. The only things I have heard dealt with the weight and SFC. It was several percent above contract.
응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report

로그인

패스워드를 잊으셨나요?
계정을 가지고 계십니까? 사용자 정의된 기능, 비행 경보 및 더 많은 정보를 위해 지금(무료) 등록하세요!
FlightAware에 참여하세요
FlightAware 항공편 추적이 광고로 지원된다는 것을 알고 계셨습니까?
FlightAware.com의 광고를 허용하면 FlightAware를 무료로 유지할 수 있습니다. Flightaware에서는 훌륭한 경험을 제공할 수 있도록 관련성있고 방해되지 않는 광고를 유지하기 위해 열심히 노력하고 있습니다. FlightAware에서 간단히 광고를 허용 하거나 프리미엄 계정을 고려해 보십시오..
종료