Back to Squawk list
  • 10

OPINION: Why The Airbus A380 Is a NEO Too Far

제출됨
 
Slightly more than a decade ago, it was Boeing’s turn to make a hard decision. Airbus had launched the A380, so the company weighed up whether to respond with a clean-sheet design or a simpler product revamp. (www.flightglobal.com) 기타...

Sort type: [Top] [Newest]


bkoskie
Not being versed in the large passenger aircraft market, would there be a sufficient market for a 2 engine version of the 747?
caleb0220
the 777-9x is basically the 2 engine 747 you speak of, minus the hump. The 777-9x takes a few less pax but overall itll kill the 747 intercontinental. Airlines love 2 engines!
preacher1
For what it's worth, I got to agree. Unless Emirates steps up to the table and lays some money down, biggest customer and "I'll take 100" will not get it. I doubt they will do that and I don't think we'll see the A380neo launch. As the writer says about Boeing, they upgraded the 747, when in hindsight, just a good general upgrading was all that they needed, if that.
pilot62
Agreed Preach , Late to the party, the 47-8 will continue to as the worlds best large cargo plane, proof of the amazing design of the original. With the 77-300ER and the X , there seems to be little hope for large 4 engine aircraft. Unless your emirates and bent on taking over the world of hub flying.
preacher1
Like I said, unless Emirates lays some money on the table and gets some skin in he game, Airbus would be foolish to launch a 380neo just based on Baker saying that he'll take 100. Right now, I don't see either one happening. I think Airbus is smarter than that and I don't think you'll see Emirates laying out any money. If things don't change, the 2 new AF1's may be the last of the 747-8's and 20 years down the line, when their replacements are due, there will be something entirely different to look at, but 4 engines will be a distant memory.
caleb0220
I will agree with the overall article. However, its not just the engine supplier, that is taking all the risk as the article suggests. If that were the case, airbus would reengine this airplane in a heartbeat to make up for slower than anticipated sales and high costs of the program.
PSBJ
PSBJ 1
Just wanted to clarify that my post about spam is not for your post, it was for some that have been removed, so now it appears that it was for yours, but it was not.

[This poster has been suspended.]

PSBJ
PSBJ 1
You have posted spam, and you have been reported. Please stop posting spam on FlightAware.
preacher1
There is a SPAM report link at the bottom of any post. You need to use it. Your comment went against a valid one and kinda makes you look silly.
PSBJ
PSBJ 1
Nope. The post I commented on has been removed, so now it appears that I commented on Caleb Gillaspie's post, which I did NOT. I commented on the ad for work, which is now gone. Furthermore, I said that the poster has been reported. Who do you think reported him? Me. I clicked the little Report bottom on the bottom of the posts.
PSBJ
PSBJ 1
My post is under the [This poster has been suspended.] note. So that is what I commented on.

Sorry for being sassy. Didn't like being called to look silly when I actually was not.
preacher1
I notice you have only been on here a short time. The SPAM is automatically taken away, while your comment is not and somebody glancing may not know what you are talking about. POSTER HAS BEEN SUSPENDED doesn't stay on there forever. For instance, it's not showing on mine and on anything posted as SPAM, it's generally done by an automatic BOT anyway so it is a waste of breath telling someone to do something. Just sayin'.

로그인

계정을 가지고 계십니까? 사용자 정의된 기능, 비행 경보 및 더 많은 정보를 위해 지금(무료) 등록하세요!
FlightAware 항공편 추적이 광고로 지원된다는 것을 알고 계셨습니까?
FlightAware.com의 광고를 허용하면 FlightAware를 무료로 유지할 수 있습니다. Flightaware에서는 훌륭한 경험을 제공할 수 있도록 관련성있고 방해되지 않는 광고를 유지하기 위해 열심히 노력하고 있습니다. FlightAware에서 간단히 광고를 허용 하거나 프리미엄 계정을 고려해 보십시오..
종료