Back to Squawk list
  • 12

NTSB Wants Timely Pireps and More of Them

제출됨
 
Building a collaborative relationship between pilots and ATC in using pilot reports (Pireps) to assemble a clearer picture of in-flight weather conditions was the underlying theme of a two-day forum, “Pireps: Pay it Forward… Because Weather for One is Weather for None,” held earlier this week in Washington, D.C. In addition to emphasizing the need for pilots to submit timely and relevant Pireps, the gathering shed light on how ATC uses those reports to provide safer routing. (www.ainonline.com) 기타...

Sort type: [Top] [Newest]


hoffberg
On every flight I provide pireps, even when the weather is uneventful. I find that ATC appreciates the info for sharing with others -- as I also benefit when I receive pireps along my route.

The pireps are especially helpful in level 1 or 2 situations, as I use the reports to help navigate through weather systems I see through the wind screen and on my two weather displays.

In a Cessna 172 I need all the information available to make my missions safe ones, and keep my passengers comfortable while they enjoy a nap on a several hour flight.
chrisbarnes
If we could get flight service to answer our calls when we TRY to call them in more pireps would show up. They do a good job calling us about tower light notams 20 miles away from our primary airport though...
hoffberg
Since last year, I discovered that if I tell ATC I desire to make a pirep and request a frequency change to do so, ATC will responde something to the effect, "NGF3005 ready to copy your pirep." This always works unless the controller has a high work load. Then expect 122.20 mHz.


Take a look at
http://flightaware.com/live/flight/NGF3005/history/20160608/1819Z/28J/KFXE
which is one of the six legs for my most recent mission.

My flight during the 2nd hour was almost a continueous pirep. There existed a VMC layer undetected by the radar products and this layer provided a tunnel/corridor for navigating through the moving storm mass. Other aircraft reported it, too, and ATC gave us that information.

The FlightAware weather depiction does not do justice to the yellow and red actually displayed on our weather products in the C 172 at the time.

In effect, the hour of flight within the storm system was almost a continuous pirep with a few pilots in the sector conversing/reporting with ATC.

[This comment has been downvoted. Show anyway.]

hoffberg
I agree -- but in a maxed-out C172 weight wise, such is only a dream. Future technology may catch by delivering smaller/lighter devices.

Also the two pitfalls you mention are very real possibilities. Sometimes the Nexrad is correct, as with a stationary front. And if we do not have rain, only building clouds, no "laundry" to speak of.

I was lucky to have that situation yesterday . . . using my eyes to stay away from the the flashing clouds and areas with cloud to ground lightning. I sought out clear passages to avoid clouds . . . which does take skill, relying upon the opaqueness and reflectivity of the clouds I am either trying to avoid or penetrate. If I am not sure, I will substantially deviate in altitude/heading as required.

Landing is also one of the choices for deviation.

로그인

계정을 가지고 계십니까? 사용자 정의된 기능, 비행 경보 및 더 많은 정보를 위해 지금(무료) 등록하세요!
FlightAware 항공편 추적이 광고로 지원된다는 것을 알고 계셨습니까?
FlightAware.com의 광고를 허용하면 FlightAware를 무료로 유지할 수 있습니다. Flightaware에서는 훌륭한 경험을 제공할 수 있도록 관련성있고 방해되지 않는 광고를 유지하기 위해 열심히 노력하고 있습니다. FlightAware에서 간단히 광고를 허용 하거나 프리미엄 계정을 고려해 보십시오..
종료