Back to Squawk list
  • 19

White House: 'Why we need aviation user fees'

제출됨
 
After almost 9,000 people urged the president to take damaging aviation user fees off the table, the administration on Jan. 13 offered its response: No way. (www.aopa.org) 기타...

Sort type: [Top] [Newest]


TXCAVU
How about ATC gets a system that actually works and then we'll talk fees.
WALLACE24
WALLACE24 0
I am of the opinion the gov does not need another fee or tax for any purpose what so ever! Work with what you got, period.
jonprovencher
Woah! An idea that makes little sense, is vague, and is open to interpretation! When did the government start making those!?! *sarcasm intended*
andrewderr
andrewderr 0
It just makes me ill to read such a poorly written WH response. That lame response really does show us the intelligence factor (or lack thereof) at work in these fees. It took me 90 seconds of research to see the difference in the fuel taxes confirmed in the AOPA article. You would think the WH has these resources too. What a halfassed halfcocked halfthought response to 8904 citizens' petition.
WALLACE24
WALLACE24 0
Lame has become the new standard.
kylevk
The response says that this fee would reduce the budget deficit by $10 billion over 10 years. The debt increases by FOUR BILLION DOLLARS every DAY.
WALLACE24
WALLACE24 0
The plane is crashing but they have yet to declare an emergency.
chris13
This fits right in with their class-warfare rhetoric. Obviously, every person that flies an airplane MUST be one of those "evil" rich guys. If someone in the WH actually had a clue, they'd understand why user-fees will be crippling to the GA community.
CTaylor959
Added cost for student pilots is not a good thing for pilot population

로그인

계정을 가지고 계십니까? 사용자 정의된 기능, 비행 경보 및 더 많은 정보를 위해 지금(무료) 등록하세요!
FlightAware 항공편 추적이 광고로 지원된다는 것을 알고 계셨습니까?
FlightAware.com의 광고를 허용하면 FlightAware를 무료로 유지할 수 있습니다. Flightaware에서는 훌륭한 경험을 제공할 수 있도록 관련성있고 방해되지 않는 광고를 유지하기 위해 열심히 노력하고 있습니다. FlightAware에서 간단히 광고를 허용 하거나 프리미엄 계정을 고려해 보십시오..
종료