Back to Squawk list
  • 29

TSA to test its airport scanner operators for radiation exposure

제출됨
 
After years of rebuffing health concerns over airport scanners, the Transportation Security Administration plans to conduct new tests on the potential radiation exposure from the machines at more than 100 airports nationwide. But the TSA does not plan to retest the machines or passengers. Instead, the agency plans to test its airport security officers to see if they are being exposed to dangerous levels of radiation while working with the scanners. (www.latimes.com) 기타...

Sort type: [Top] [Newest]


preacher1
preacher1 0
That should have already been put in place as it is standard procedure for other workers working around any radiation source continually,i.e Xray techs, nuclear power plant and all the military folks that work around any nuclear stuff.

Question is, what if they find over exposure or someone at threshold, what are they gonna do?
rick737
Simple, Wayne. The TSA will bury the data, move the over exposed individuals to non-checkpoint duties and march on from there. But imagine when (the truth will always find a way)the data is made public. Every law firm in the country will switch from Mesotheliyoma litigation to radiation exposure suits. Get ready.
preacher1
preacher1 0
probably so

zennermd
zennermd 0
I don't think they'll do anything because they aren't going to find anything. If you know what I mean...
preacher1
preacher1 0
Sad, but probably true
zennermd
zennermd 0
Derg
Right on Wayne yes..workers in that industry wear a card which records the total input. Not sure what happens in the US military but here in Europe we wear a tag.
donaldus
Amazing that crewmembers (exposed to higher levels of radiation than common-folk), aren't issued rad badges.
rick737
Maybe it's time for the Pilot unions to put a few radiation test badges on volunteers to see how much we are really exposed.
preacher1
preacher1 0
Probably that nobody ever thought of it
tartarus12
I see in the story they have no intention to test the people they are directly irradiating. In 30 years when cancer rates skyrocket. I bet the TSA won't even be mentioned.
sheltonrl
In 30 years I hope the TSA is long gone.
sheltonrl
In 30 years I hope it has been out of existsnt for about 29 years.
tartarus12
You and me both, brother.
WALLACE24
WALLACE24 0
They are definitely behind the airplane on this issue.
GateHold
Exposure concerns are a red herring.

The real problem with these machines is that they don't necessarily work, and that they're a multi-billion dollar fleecing of US taxpayers.

Who is TSA KIDDING?  They've got a scanner at one checkpoint, but NO scanner at the one right next to it. They've got scanners at some airports, but not others...  

Hmmm, it'd take some real brains for a terrorist to work around that.  

Meanwhile, explosives sniffing dogs can do as good a job at a fraction of the price.   

Oh, but of course there isn't some corporation standing to rake in billions from the government for the deployment of dogs.  

That's what this is about. Follow the money, not the radiation.


PS
kb9uwu
no joke, it's all about the $ and the corporate lobby!
BoeingFan59
Well if they find anything how much you wanna bet they'll cover it up as quick as they notice it?
xmacfly
I can see the parasite lawyer adds on tv now. "If you have flown in the last 2 years you may be entitled to compensation" I thought there were no exposure problems with these machines? Chertoff said so.
rogermoore
Several of us that fly long haul flights, especially polar routes, have used them to collect data. The company dismisses the data as unreliable because they don't want to have to do anything about it.

로그인

계정을 가지고 계십니까? 사용자 정의된 기능, 비행 경보 및 더 많은 정보를 위해 지금(무료) 등록하세요!
FlightAware 항공편 추적이 광고로 지원된다는 것을 알고 계셨습니까?
FlightAware.com의 광고를 허용하면 FlightAware를 무료로 유지할 수 있습니다. Flightaware에서는 훌륭한 경험을 제공할 수 있도록 관련성있고 방해되지 않는 광고를 유지하기 위해 열심히 노력하고 있습니다. FlightAware에서 간단히 광고를 허용 하거나 프리미엄 계정을 고려해 보십시오..
종료