이 웹 사이트는 쿠키를 사용합니다. 이 웹 사이트를 사용하고 탐색함으로써 귀하는 이러한 쿠기 사용을 수락하는 것입니다.
종료
FlightAware 항공편 추적이 광고로 지원된다는 것을 알고 계셨습니까?
FlightAware.com의 광고를 허용하면 FlightAware를 무료로 유지할 수 있습니다. Flightaware에서는 훌륭한 경험을 제공할 수 있도록 관련성있고 방해되지 않는 광고를 유지하기 위해 열심히 노력하고 있습니다. FlightAware에서 간단히 광고를 허용 하거나 프리미엄 계정을 고려해 보십시오..
종료
Back to Squawk list
  • 18

Boeing's most important plane could be headed for trouble

제출됨
 
The 787 Dreamliner is the first new plane Boeing has designed and built from scratch in 20 years, but its entry into service has been far from smooth. (www.businessinsider.com) 기타...

Sort type: [Top] [Newest]


mattwestuk
Matt West 15
Although I'm an Airbus fan, the 787 is still a fantastic aircraft. Fuel prices fluctuate wildly, I'm sure they will go up again soon making the 787 viable. However, from my personal experience, the 787 may be falling out of favor not because of fuel prices, but because Airlines insist on cramming people into the darn thing - when you stick 9 seats abreast into an air-frame that was optimally designed for 8, passengers tend to hate the aircraft.

If anyone disagrees, go to Seatguru and look at the reviews for AA and BA 787 air-frames. It's not Boeing's fault the airlines did this, but when the aircraft has been branded as the height of comfort, passengers tend to avoid it if it is anything but.
TOMROM
TOMROM 8
So sad to learn that "Preacher" past away. I loved reading his comments. May his soul rest in peace. Our condolences to his family.Tony
conx
Oil prices will never rise again! Remember, you heard that here first. And if you believe that, well, I got mountain log cabin in Florida to sell you, on the west coast. Remember when the 747s came out and they were loaded with lounges and pianos? What happened to them? Oh yah, the beancounters can put 40 more seats in. There goes the great passenger "experience" as the clowns call it. Now, it's all just a ride.
pilot62
Speed with sound reduction in and out + China ='s the 787 won't be " in trouble " for decades
ssobol
When Boeing was getting close to rolling out the 787, I had a tour of the design center where they designed and tested the interior layouts. They went into detail about how they did it and the psychological theories and testing they did to make the passenger experience great. They showed us various layouts that they proposed for the 787 interior. They were all very nice and spacious. However, it was pretty clear that no carrier (US anyway) would use them because there was too much space that could be used for seats that was not being used that way. There was almost no chance that the average coach passenger would see an interior as spacious as Boeing proposed.
wx1996
wx1996 4
Would someone be able to educate me on why the A350 does not have the same concern?
wopri
Cabin width at armrest level is 22 cm wider on the A350 compared to the B787.
n9341c
n9341c 2
OK let's see if I have this right...the 787 program is in trouble. The story ends with a mention that fuel prices are back up to $50 a barrel which makes the plane attractive again, and there is a backlog of 750 airplanes.

God what a confusing article.
Bert076
This month I flew a couple of times with the 787 Dreamliner. I found there are serious pros and cons. As pros it has reduced noise levels inside, and the flight at cruising altitude is very smooth and stable. But as cons I must say that the whole aircraft's construction feels too 'light'. Not only the sounds of flaps mechanics and landing gear become very intrusive this way, but more seriously, cabin sturdiness is a real issue during take off and landing. When the wheels hit the ground, the whole cabin is shaking enormously, the bagage bins wobble an inch or more. The toilet 'cabins' are only attached to the floor and not to the ceiling (!), and so you see clearly in the gap between the toilets and the ceiling how the whole airplane body is rocking and swinging inches from left to right above the toilets. It does not feel sturdy, at all. And indeed the seating is a bit too narrow for a 100 kg male.
RandomX9
RandomX9 1
Aircraft are designed to flex slightly. If an airliner was rigid it would not be able to absorb the forces of takeoffs, landings, maneuvers and turbulence. I would guess the 787 would be particularly flexible because of its composite construction, and Boeing designed it to do so. http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/tech_ops/read.main/267122/
However, take this all with a grain of salt because I haven't been on one.
Bert076
Yes, I know. But I'm comparing with other Boeing planes like 767-300, 777-200, 747's or with comparable Airbus planes. Mind you, I do like Boeing. And I'm not so easily scared (I found out during a near crash at Funchal airport). And yes, I fly regularly. Still, the Dreamliner's landing was a disappointing experience IMHO.
rndsm1
Bert, I am spot on with your comments. The one thing I would point out regarding the aircraft's construction feeling too "light" is the intentional flexibility of the aircraft in general. As far as the interiors, as I am sure you are aware, that has nothing to do with Boeing's aircraft. I have noticed, increasingly on US carriers especially, the lack of attention to the actual cabin inserts. They do not seem to anchor the sections in place as sturdily as they likely were on initial delivery. I have found the aircraft take-off & landings to be rather smooth. The flaps, wheel retraction, and deployment do seem to be a bit more "noticeable" but I believe the overall flight quietness, along with the increased humidity & cabin air circulation cancel out my negative feeling regarding the wheels, flaps, etc. I am a firm believer the American carriers will continue to push the limits on what we will tolerate as a flying public. Unfortunately, with all of the acquisitions, mergers, and takeovers, there has become too little competition so it is highly unlikely the carriers will do anything customer comfort driven. It will be a continuation of too many seats for the size/type of aircraft. (Sorry for the additional "rant", taking us off subject, just a bit.)
Bert076
Yes Brent, you're right about the improved cabin air humidity and circulation. I would put that on the pros side.
atsdroid
Slow news day at BI? This seems like a big non-story. It's a hot airplane, with lots of orders, but sales are drying up?! Day-traders, buy puts! Airlines are keeping their older and less efficient 767s because they can afford the cheap fuel?! Well sure...for the moment. This may only change the rate of fleet replacement, not that the fleet will be replaced. And what are they gonna buy? It's a better and more efficient airplane, so fuel price doesn't matter if you plan on playing Airline Tycoon for the long run. Here I was expecting a story about how someone discovered the wings may snap off...(they do flex alot).
IMissPiedmont
Chicken Little is screaming here. Obviously, the person who wrote this has no experience in writing on aviation history.
linbb
linbb 3
I agree but the crap that is being posted on here by some is getting very tiring to put up with. Its just another armchair wanna bee. Used to be when Preacher was on here he posted things that were relevant not some National Enquired crap.
30west
30west 0
linbb, I agree with you 100%. Flight Aware has changed significantly from discussions on "pilot stuff" to squawks that are a waste of time to read which can be seen in many squawks never getting any comments.
joelwiley
There are quite a number of posters who appear to work for some online rag and post 5, 10 or more 'stories' from them weekly. I surmise it is to draw revenue-generating traffic to their sites. There are others appearantly with an axe to grind, such as the OP here. A far cry from 'hangar flying' as the late and geatly missed Preacher1 called it.
Highflyer1950
You pretty much say it all, too many novices with opinions on everything they know nothing about. I wish there were a filter that would let qualified posters say their piece and prevent anyone with an Ipad or computer from posting drivel. I personally never minded a well thought out question or statement from a non pilot but lately these posters come off as complete idiots and yes I miss Wayne's posts.
RandomX9
RandomX9 3
I am not a pilot. I know very little compared to most of the contributors and commenters, so you can judge me on that. However, I agree that there's been a change in the comments section. it does seem the squawk quality has gone into a descent. I used to enjoy the articles on squawks because they weren't the news-feed all-for-clicks items it seems like gets posted now. It seems language and responses have gotten rougher.
joelwiley
The signal-to-noise ratio has dropped significantly. Preacher1 used to make comments that stimulated thoughtful discussions. After his passing, nobody has yet taken up the slack. There do seem to be a lot more postings that are ads intended to draw attention to aviation themed websites to benefit their advertisers more than to provide information and discussion topics. I am among those who miss Wayne's input.
mhlansdell00
Would you please e mail me, mhlansdell00@yahoo.com.
bentwing60
Welcome to the bottom of the food chain!
whip5209
I just looked at who wrote this. Business Insider. They are entirely anti-business left wing and don't deserve to be taken seriously in my opinion. In other words, they write crap.

As for whether the 787 is uncomfortable or not, I'm going to find out this for myself in December. 15 hours from LAX to MEL.

[This comment has been downvoted. Show anyway.]

wopri
I don't quite understand your message. Do you want to say preacher posted crap on here?
linbb
linbb 10
That statement is total BULL SHIT he had been there and done that and could answer most questions due to that.
I am offended by your post and so would he. But due to the fact he passed away due to illness, check around I think you can find the posts when he did.
I asked him questions on here that only someone who had flown AC of many types could know.
His replys were always polite and to the point and that went for anyone he answered.
UNLIKE YOURS
Preacher may you rest in peace,winds be calm skys blue,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,RIP
CaptainFreedom
lights out, latasingh....my thumbs down will be #10.
CRAANoise
The Preacher passed away a few months back
linbb
linbb 5
Thanks I forgot to add that to my post. He was a great moderator and commenter on here as he had BEEN THERE DONE THAT unlike most posers on here.
He went west and will forever remain in my thoughts as I read posts on here from those who do know what they are talking about.
zennermd
zennermd 3
It is one thing to have an opinion, but it is another to blatantly attack someone else's, especially someone like preacher. Right or wrong at times, he was a good man with great thoughts and opinions.

Blue skies and fair winds Preacher.
pilot62
And hey even the best of us will age, miss him here, and none of us are perfect
joelwiley
I regret that I have but one downvote to give for this drivel

로그인

계정을 가지고 계십니까? 사용자 정의된 기능, 비행 경보 및 더 많은 정보를 위해 지금(무료) 등록하세요!