Back to Squawk list
  • 13

Private jet in crash that killed Bin Laden relatives came in too fast, report finds

제출됨
 
A private jet that crashed, killing three members of Osama bin Laden’s family, landed too far down the runway because it was travelling 40% faster than the recommended speed, accident investigators concluded. The Saudi-registered Phenom 300 jet smashed into an earth bank at the end of the runway at Blackbushe airport, Camberley, on the border of Hampshire and Surrey, on 31 July last year before becoming airborne again and colliding with several parked cars. (www.theguardian.com) 기타...

Sort type: [Top] [Newest]


ColinSeftel
Full AAIB report here: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/58259b42e5274a2562000024/Embraer_EMB-505_Phenom_300_HZ-IBN_12-16.pdf
joelwiley
Interesting read, thanks for finding it.
jbqwik
jbqwik 1
Agree. Thanks.
bbabis
bbabis 1
The report stated: “It is possible that in these circumstances the pilot … fixated on his initial strategy – landing – and lacked the mental capacity to recognize that the approach had become unstable and should be discontinued.”

He recognized it. Hence the attempt to deploy speedbreaks on short final. He forced it to the ground with a panel and windshield so full of red flags he couldn't see any more. Going into a 3500' runway there was even less tolerance of deviation. What unannounced and unknown factor made him push such a bad situation?
yr2012
maybe he was being controlled remotely
bbabis
bbabis 5
More like he wasn't remotely in control.
freneticmonk
Call me a tin foil hat man but it does sound too cut and dry. An experienced commander with 1,181hrs in the craft in near perfect conditions doesn't TOGA when it's not mission critical to land?
jbqwik
jbqwik 1
Agree, has me confounded too. At 150 kts he could have floated on around without much fuss.
joelwiley
Good question. Report said situation may have overloaded his SA. I wonder if back-seat get-thereitis may have been a component. We will never know

[This poster has been suspended.]

joelwiley
So you are saying the flight went to the dogs due to the bark side of the force?

[This poster has been suspended.]

joelwiley
I'd suggest starting here: ISBN-10: 0486408787

[This poster has been suspended.]

joelwiley
My comment was in response to yours where you referred to 'maybe they failed to buy enough "UP" '. You responded to my reply about the 'bark side of the force' with "See Mr Wiley...there are times when we can be in agreement...let's work on that !"
To help work on that, I referred you to a well-known work of social satire. Our joint conversation has slipped away from aviation in this instance.

Back on the aviation subject, you contributed comments on 'stabilized approach'. According to the report, the pilot initially planned to land after the ultralight. The ultralight pilot suggested the jet land first. The pilot climbed over the ultralight and sharply descended. In your opinion as a pilot, how much did that action have to do with the fatal unstabilized approach?

[This poster has been suspended.]

joelwiley
De mortuis nihil nisi bonum

[This poster has been suspended.]

davidrbarnes
Let me lend some assistance with your challenges with Joel's remarks. And his remarks echo your own:

https://lmgtfy.com/?q=De+mortuis+nihil+nisi+bonum

[This poster has been suspended.]

wingbolt
wingbolt 2
Thanks Petey, I appreciate your gratitude.
Dianthis
Wilbur Sanch-esq,

When every single comment you make gets downvoted, you think you'd take a hint.
joelwiley
I did ask you opinion. Your answer was "I wasn't there...Dosnt [sic] sound like something I would do". I think your answer will do for mine, with the addition of an 'e' and apostrophe after proofreading. (we all make typo's)

로그인

계정을 가지고 계십니까? 사용자 정의된 기능, 비행 경보 및 더 많은 정보를 위해 지금(무료) 등록하세요!
FlightAware 항공편 추적이 광고로 지원된다는 것을 알고 계셨습니까?
FlightAware.com의 광고를 허용하면 FlightAware를 무료로 유지할 수 있습니다. Flightaware에서는 훌륭한 경험을 제공할 수 있도록 관련성있고 방해되지 않는 광고를 유지하기 위해 열심히 노력하고 있습니다. FlightAware에서 간단히 광고를 허용 하거나 프리미엄 계정을 고려해 보십시오..
종료