Back to Squawk list
  • 23

Opinion: Boeing’s Project Means Work For Airbus Strategists

제출됨
 
Conventional wisdom had it that Boeing’s recent woes would keep it from being able to afford developing an all-new aircraft in the foreseeable future, even if it were strikingly necessary. But, as Aviation Week has reported, Boeing has begun talks with suppliers about a project built on its previous work for a new midmarket airplane, currently available technologies and an aggressive timetable (AW&ST Feb. 8-21, p. 12). This raises the very real prospect that the company may actually launch… (aviationweek.com) 기타...

Sort type: [Top] [Newest]


canuck44
canuck44 5
Once they decide whether they go wide body or single aisle the project will move rapidly using a hybrid of existing technology, materials and manufacturing processes. Hopefully they have learned something from the 787, 737 MAX and 777X projects that can be integrated to a more smooth roll out on a schedule when the market still exists.
tyketto
Agreed. IF they go single aisle, they would leverage what they have from MAX (and possibly 739) and go from there. the drawback there is that they would still be relying on a near 50-year old design.

If they went wide body, they still have the entire B783 project that they scrapped for the B788 and B789 to use. that should be simple to implement as long as they don't mess with the CG of the body.
punkrawk78
A new single aisle aircraft would have to be a clean sheet design, there’s just no more efficiency to squeeze out of the 737. My guess is it would be more of a scaled down 787 using materials (composites) and technologies (avionics, systems, etc) from that program. I don’t see why they can’t come up with new designs that mimic the 757/767 where you’d have both single and double aisle aircraft that share enough commonality to have a single type rating.
BluSTi
A '57 variant would make the most sense. Plus, it was/is an extremely capable aircraft.
E1craZ4life
If only Boeing had realized the potential of the 757 before they stopped production.
BluSTi
Fundamentally there is nothing wrong with the '37 airframe.
JMARTINSON
Why would they do this now?
BluSTi
Because it's the perfect time, if you're an engineer. Terrible time if you're a financial analyst. Let's see who drives the ship at the Lazy B.
edallen628
Ed Allen -2
No body in Boeing is an expert! They got themselves into this deal! So as the person they voted for says,”here’s the deal” Your bed U sleep in in!

[This comment has been downvoted. Show anyway.]

royhunte92
From a nut who frequently misspells words.....
EtienneDaniels
Did ever ask an person from the UK, Australia or South Africa what they think about your spelling? I understand him and I'm a non native speaker.
sconklan
sconklan -8
I would still bet on Boeing. Of course, we have to hope our economy survives Sleepy Unelected Joe for it to work.
BluSTi
I hope he lasts 4 years, the alternative is a death sentence.
E1craZ4life
It's possible the Curse of Tippecanoe may rise again.

로그인

계정을 가지고 계십니까? 사용자 정의된 기능, 비행 경보 및 더 많은 정보를 위해 지금(무료) 등록하세요!
FlightAware 항공편 추적이 광고로 지원된다는 것을 알고 계셨습니까?
FlightAware.com의 광고를 허용하면 FlightAware를 무료로 유지할 수 있습니다. Flightaware에서는 훌륭한 경험을 제공할 수 있도록 관련성있고 방해되지 않는 광고를 유지하기 위해 열심히 노력하고 있습니다. FlightAware에서 간단히 광고를 허용 하거나 프리미엄 계정을 고려해 보십시오..
종료