← Back to Squawk list
  • 0

The Most Avoidable Passenger Plane Crash: Air France Flight 447

제출됨
 
On June 1, 2009, Air France Flight 447 was cruising from Rio de Janeiro to Paris when suddenly the communications were lost, and debris from the flight was later recovered from the Atlantic Ocean. The investigation revealed several issues that caused the flight to crash, which would later be addressed to improve flight safety. (aeroxplorer.com) 기타...

Dan Mena
주별 선정뉴스 정키열정자친구우등생 명부우등생 명부오늘의 픽아마추어 사진사홍보인

Sort type: [Top] [Newest]


ToddBaldwin3
ToddBaldwin3 8
Very poorly written, disorganized and incomplete. You skipped over many relevant contributing factors. Did you even read the rather lengthy BEA report and many of the other technical reports regarding this crash?
응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Report
godutch
godutch -3
...and? What are you trying to insinuate? I agree the article was poorly written, but what else?
응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report
KenWD0ELQ
Ken Mitchell 3
Among other things, the author of the article seems to be unaware of existence of PITOT tubes, referring to them as "pilot tubes". Somebody even vaguely familiar with aircraft wouldn't make that mistake, and if autocorrect did, they'd catch it.
응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report
ToddBaldwin3
ToddBaldwin3 3
No insinuations. I just expressed my thoughts on the article.
응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report
godutch
godutch 3
Cool...understood.
응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report
ghstark
Greg S 4
A surprising number of airline disasters can be traced to blocked pitot tubes. There hasn't been one in quite a while, so perhaps enough hard lessons have been learned about the issue. Even more basic, don't fly into bad weather, period.
응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Report
houseofgold
houseofgold 3
I just don’t think the press handled this crash with the same constant corporate negativity that it gave the two Boeing 737’s. It seems that deficient systems training and troubleshooting
응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Report
avionik99
avionik99 -1
And you thought Boeing had poor designs!
응답 ↓•퍼머링크•Report
sparkie624
sparkie624 1
It was not really a poor design, even though I think Boeing is miles ahead. There is one big difference between Boeing and Airbus and why I much more like the Boeing A/C.
Boeing believes the Pilot should have the final authority over the aircraft and design the avionics accordingly.
Airbus believes the Computers should have the final authority over the aircraft and design the avionics accordingly.
There was a Russian pilot who had his child in the cockpit. The kid accidentally hit the yolk and disconnected the a/p and the crew did not pick up on it. They flew a perfectly good plane to the ground killing all onboard because they trusted the plane more than themselves!... I believe the Captain should have the final authority!
응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report
ToddBaldwin3
ToddBaldwin3 5
And ultimately, that is what brought AF447 down. They were flying an Airbus, and an Airbus won’t let you stall. Unfortunately, they didn’t realize that in Alternate Law, that protection no longer worked. Complacency and not fully cognizant of the aircraft systems operating limitations.
응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report
ChristianBase
Christian Base 5
Boeing does *not* think the pilot should have the final authority over the aircraft. Proof: MCAS.
응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report
linbb
linbb -2
Where is all this stupid stuff coming from this forum used to be about current problems not things dredged up from years ago and speculation accidents. Boeing Aircraft problems in the last many days are just news outlets trying to sell there goods to people. A tire falls off, airline only problem same with an engine fire same with a panel falling off. You got sucked into the same dumb deal by reading them. Boeings door problem has been found and delt with the bolts were either never there or fell out before the door blew off. Evidence of that is there was no signature on the castings to indicate any were in place when it blew off.
응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report
cmuncy
Chris Muncy 6
AeroExplroer is a aviation news congregator and the more news stories a person submits the higher their status goes. That is why a few of the people, this OP included, only post articles from AeroExplorer. so he can be a member of the shiny medal exclusive club.
응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report
ToddBaldwin3
ToddBaldwin3 9
In the case of Aeroxplorer, theyre trying to generate revenue through ads, click bait. They write very mediocre to poor stories on things aviation related. Sometimes they report on recent news, but it’s just a rewriting of news stories already posted. Then they self-promote their own stories. The poster, Dan Mena writes/works for Aeroxplorer and only posts items from Aeroxplorer. There are several other posters that do this with other aviation sites.
응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report
cmuncy
Chris Muncy 4
BINGO! Right on the nose Todd!
응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report
ChristianBase
Christian Base 4
Make sure you downvote the article.
응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report
cmuncy
Chris Muncy 3
Done and done! On the same note, Upvote Todd's and I'll get yours Christian.
응답 ↓•퍼머링크•모•Report

로그인

패스워드를 잊으셨나요?
계정을 가지고 계십니까? 사용자 정의된 기능, 비행 경보 및 더 많은 정보를 위해 지금(무료) 등록하세요!
FlightAware에 참여하세요
FlightAware 항공편 추적이 광고로 지원된다는 것을 알고 계셨습니까?
FlightAware.com의 광고를 허용하면 FlightAware를 무료로 유지할 수 있습니다. Flightaware에서는 훌륭한 경험을 제공할 수 있도록 관련성있고 방해되지 않는 광고를 유지하기 위해 열심히 노력하고 있습니다. FlightAware에서 간단히 광고를 허용 하거나 프리미엄 계정을 고려해 보십시오..
종료